-Caveat Lector- > January 2, 2001 > > A Turning Point In American History > > By Connie White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Election 2000 is one of those turning points in American > history: it reminded some, and exposed to others, that this > is not a country "of the people, by the people, and for the > people," and it reminded some and exposed to others that the > American judicial system is now, and has always been, > partisan and is not impartial. > > Electoral democracy is based on citizenship, and citizenship > means that the individual has certain rights and duties. What > has been presumed to be among an American citizens' rights > is the right to vote and that each vote counts. Tossing out > ballots is a fundamental violation of the rights of voting > citizens. During the debates before the U.S. Supreme Court > regarding "uncounted" votes in Florida, USA, one of the > leading justices of the Supreme Court, Antonin Scalia, > stated that there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution > that guarantees U.S. citizens the right to vote. So much for > members of the "highest court in the land" believing in the > "democratic right to vote." When the Supreme Court upheld > the decision to stop the vote counting in Florida, America > was exposed as not being a "democracy" -- representative > or otherwise. > > The Republican pundits are justifying the Supreme Court > decision (intervention) by pointing out that America is not > a "democracy," but a "republic." (The two political systems > are not mutually exclusive. A "republic" is a political > system whereby the "people" elect representatives to govern > for them -- inherent in this definition is the understanding > that there is no "king" -- and a "democracy" is a political > system based in majority decision-making. You could have a > democratic republic, which is a political system that has > democratic decision-making, and no king.) The American > government more closely resembles a "timocracy" -- a > government of the propertied class. The point regarding > America being a "republic" was also made during the Monica > Lewinsky hearings, when the overwhelming majority of the > American people denounced the Republican party witch > hunts, and the poles indicated that Clinton should remain > president. Here is where the "constitutional republic" game > comes in -- the Republicans argue that they are doing their > "constitutional duty," and indicate that America is a > "constitutional republic," and not a "democracy." Although > poles -- or popular vote at election time -- may indicate > the will of the people, the Republican Party's position > during the Lewinsky hearings was "to hell with the will of > the people," we have the power and the constitutional right > and we intend to use it. Similarly, during Election 2000, > the Republican Party said "to hell with the will of the > people" (the popular vote), and "constitutionally" relied > upon its Supreme Court partisans to render a judicial > decision that secured the presidential election for > George Bush. > > So much for American "democracy," and majority decision- > making. > > Election 2000 has exposed that America is not the > representative democratic nation of the world. It has been > exposed as a fake and a fraud, where power relations are the > motivating force in the legislative, executive and judiciary > "branches," and class interests are the glue that solidify > the Republican and Democratic parties into one. Hence, all > the talk about "bi-partisanship" today. > > But, has the American working class seen enough in Election > 2000 to understand that this is not "our" government -- that > this is not a "democracy" whereby the "people" elect the > representatives who will govern? > > Let's not be quick to forget all that was exposed in > Election 2000. > > During Election 2000, the American electorate continued to > protest the choices offered in "the race for the presidency." > Approximately 52% of the American electorate did not vote > for president or voted for a third party candidate. > Additionally, and most importantly, -- 2.5 million American > voters were considered the "under vote," which are those > ballots on which the voter did not indicate a presidential > choice. These "under vote" ballots represent those voters > whom I believe chose "none of the above" for president, but > took the time to vote for initiatives they wanted passed, > and for local or national legislative candidates. Where in > America's Constitution does it state that voters not voting > for president would have their ballots "kicked out"? The > American electorate should have known about this practice > before going to the polls. This protesting American > electorate clearly showed that their interests are > not being represented in the choices presented at > election time. > > Some have presented the initiative/proposition process as a > beginning for direct democracy in this country: the "masses" > of people would not have to get the legislature to pass a > bill, but could utilize this process for legislation in the > interests of the masses of people -- albeit this process is > currently dominated by money, big business and ruling class > lobbyist interests. The fact that 2.5 million "under votes" > were thrown out nationally without the American electorate's > knowledge or approval exposes the initiative/proposition > arena as an illusion of power -- the working class does not > control the election processes in any of its manifestations. > These election processes are controlled by the ruling class > and its representatives. > > Power in America will not concede unless confronted from a > position of power. It has been said that classes rule and > parties govern. Our (working class labor) party must be at > the seat of power -- in Congress confronting the power of > the ruling class parties. > > During Election 2000, the Electoral College was also exposed > as being partisan, and not based in the popular vote. During > the aftermath of November 7, 2000, the Electoral College was > a heavy topic of discussion. Many of these discussions high- > lighted the fact that electors are usually selected by the > national conventions of the two-party system, as well as > that electors are the ones responsible for "electing" the > president. Election 2000 has reminded some, and exposed for > others, that America's president is elected by 270 electors > who are selected by the Democratic and/or Republican parties. > > So much for majority decision-making in America. > > Election 2000 reminded some, and exposed for others that the > American president is not elected by "popular vote." This > was clearly reinforced by the U.S. Supreme Court decision > to stop re-counting ballots in Florida. The U.S. judicial > system is supposed to be non-partisan. Constitutionally, the > Supreme Court is an appointed and unelected lifetime office > so that, presumably, appointees would not need to be concerned > with reelection and, thereby, free to make judicial decisions > based on the best interests of the country rather than to > cater to a particular party or interest group. > > Supposedly, the justices of the Supreme Court have no > respect of persons, and they are "sworn in" declaring those > exact words. The partisanship shown by the judicial system > -- and especially that shown by the Supreme Court during the > aftermath of November 7, 2000 -- exposed this non-partisan > judicial system for the lie that it is. During prime time > television and radio in the aftermath of Election 2000, we > had elected officials fighting it out with and before the > State Court system, while the political parties called upon > their "partisan" judges to decide issues surrounding the > counting of votes in its/ their partisan favor Election > 2000 has reminded some, and exposed for others that these > appointed judges -- even those appointed for a lifetime to > the "highest court of the land" -- are there to represent > the interests of a political party of the ruling class, and > most definitely to uphold the class biases of the American > Constitution against the "will of the people," and the > working class as a whole, (See Beard's "An Economic > Interpretation of the Constitution of the United > States.") > > Election 2000 is not just about exposing contradictions, but > has presented us with yet another opportunity to consider > our solutions. My hope is that the American working class > has turned from its class-less consciousness, and turned > toward looking to its interests. My hope is that American > labor has turned from believing that its interests would > ever be represented by the Democratic Party. My hope is that > what is called the "left" in this country -- the "left" of > all colors, ideologies and political perspectives -- will > turn toward building a labor party to represent the > political interests of our class (the working class). > > My hope is that the American working class will see the > necessity to function as a class for itself, and to > confront power with power. > > Copyleft (c) 2000 Connie White. Redistribute Freely. <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
