-Caveat Lector-

>
>           William F. Buckley, Jr. - ON THE RIGHT
>                  Friday, January 19, 2001
>------------------------------------------------------------
>To Subscribe! visit: http://www.shagmail.com/sub/sub-buckley.html
>------------------------------------------------------------
>
>ON THE RIGHT by William F. Buckley Jr.
>
>HOW TO PRACTICE DISRESPECT
>
>The president of the United States, no less, has lightheartedly
>questioned the legitimacy of the presidential election.
>Lightheartedly not in the sense of a roast, at which you
>are invited to say uproariously improvised defamations of
>the guest of honor; lightheartedly in the sense of Mr.
>Clinton's historical insouciance. No one can know better
>than a president who has served in office the axiomatic
>dependence on legitimacy. Now Mr. Clinton is making jokes
>on the subject that should be off-limits this side of
>Letterman and Leno.
>
>What Clinton said about campaign manager William Daley was,
>"I think he did a brilliant job in leading Vice President
>Gore to victory." He said it again at the banquet that
>night: "What I told them upstairs was Bill Daley ran the
>first presidential campaign in history that was so clearly
>winning, a court had to stop the vote in order to change
>the outcome."
>
>The next day -- inevitably -- the president-elect was
>asked about it. Governor Bush was piqued, but brushed
>Clinton off with less of the retaliatory verve one might
>have got from, say, Ronald Reagan. Are there reasonable
>limits to the expression of sour grapes?
>
>In Little Rock, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette publishes
>a weekly column by Gene Lyons, who hosts an annual event
>designed to elicit "wit, irony or sarcasm for humane
>purposes." Mr. Lyons quotes as "hard to surpass" a
>proffered pledge of allegiance by one Paul Kirkpatrick.
>"... I will badmouth the president daily, I will work
>in whatever small way I can to defeat and undermine his
>programs and agenda, I will believe every scurrilous
>lie told about him, and I will criticize and ridicule
>his wife and children at every opportunity."
>
>Mr. Lyons brings to mind the line by the critic Guy
>Davenport: "Sometimes, on reading Goethe, one has the
>paralyzing suspicion that he thinks he's being funny."
>
>But professor James K. Galbraith was not trying to be
>funny, as far as one can tell, when he wrote for The
>Boston Globe lines gleefully quoted in the
>Democrat-Gazette column. "The key to dealing with the
>Bush people ... is precisely not to accept them. ...
>I will not reconcile myself to them. They lost the
>election. Then they arranged to obstruct the count of
>the vote. They don't deserve to be there, and that
>changes everything. They have earned our civic
>disrespect, and that is what the people should accord
>them."
>
>These lines are a part of a longer piece that will
>appear in the Texas Observer. There we will have the
>judgment of professor Galbraith on "the events of
>late in the year 2000." It is that "the United States
>left behind constitutional republicanism, and turned
>to a different form of government." We have now
>"corporate democracy. A system whereby a board of
>directors -- read Supreme Court -- selects the chief
>executive officer. The CEO in turn appoints new
>members of the board. The shareholders, owners in
>title only, are invited to cast their votes in periodic
>referenda. But their franchise is only symbolic, for
>management holds a majority of the proxies. On no
>important issue do the CEO and the board ever permit
>themselves to lose."
>
>This is a fantasy that Linda Chavez will especially
>enjoy. Mr. Galbraith is University of Texas Professor
>of Government in the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public
>Affairs, where he can study stolen elections under high
>domestic patronage.
>
>The planted axiom here is that five members of the Supreme
>Court were what? -- bribed? coerced? persuaded? -- to
>ignore their oaths of office in order unconstitutionally
>to effect the election of a Republican. That kind of
>language hasn't been around since the John Birch Society
>taught that genuine understanding of postwar history
>required one to understand that Dwight D. Eisenhower was
>a Soviet agent.
>
>Fellow travelers in sedition don't need to buy the entire
>Galbraith dogma. But they might find his practical advice
>enticing. "The new president should be allowed lifetime
>appointments only by consensus. The public should oppose --
>and 50 Senate Democrats should freely block -- judicial
>nominations whenever they carry even the slightest ideological
>taint. That may mean most of them, but no matter. And as for
>the Supreme Court especially, vacancies need not be filled."
>
>Individual items on the Bush agenda should be "furiously
>opposed," as for instance the elimination of the estate tax.
>Is there a foreign-policy plank in the Galbraith agenda? For
>sure. "The people must unite to oppose the global dangers of
>National Missile Defense -- a strategic nightmare on which
>Bush campaigned -- that threatens for all time the security
>of us all."
>
>To which the obvious comment is that professor Galbraith
>shouldn't worry: Corporate capitalism would not permit
>corporate suicide, so he is safe after all.
>
>
>             Questions? Comments? Email us at:
>                 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to