What happens when the fox gets to "reveal" why the henhouse is empty ...


Lawsuit Could Reopen Watergate

By SETH HETTENA
.c The Associated Press

BALTIMORE (AP) - The Watergate burglary was not an attempt to remove
potentially embarrassing photographs of John Dean's future wife from a
secretary's desk, despite the claims of convicted conspirator G. Gordon
Liddy, the secretary's lawyer said Wednesday in opening statements for a
defamation lawsuit.

The lawsuit was filed by Ida ``Maxie'' Wells, the former secretary for the
Democratic National Committee. It seeks $5.1 million from Liddy for claiming
that the burglars who broke into DNC headquarters at the Watergate complex
were looking for photographs that linked Dean's fiance to a call-girl ring.

Wells says Liddy falsely accused her of procuring prostitutes for the DNC in
the early 1970s.

Her attorney, David Dorsen, said Wednesday that Liddy defamed Wells by
repeating the theory about the Watergate break-in that was raised in the book
``Silent Coup.''

Liddy began discussing Wells in speeches after Dean sued Liddy and the
authors of that 1991 book over its claim that Dean instigated the Watergate
break-in. In June, the lawsuit was dismissed.

Dean, who was President Nixon's chief White House lawyer, said he would
testify and deny the accusations. Dean's wife, Maureen, also is listed as a
possible witness for Wells. Other potential witnesses listed by both sides
include Watergate figures E. Howard Hunt, Charles Colson and James McCord.

Liddy's attorney, John Williams, countered in his opening remarks that Liddy
has several sources for his theory about the motive behind the break-in,
including a number of books and what Williams said was a historical fact:
that one of the burglars had a key to Wells' desk.

``He says what he says because the historical literature will show that Ms.
Wells' telephone was being used to contact the call-girl ring,'' Williams
said. ``This case is about whether Mr. Liddy can openly discuss another
theory of history.

``Nobody can explain why the burglars had a key to her desk and why her desk
was broken into.''

Liddy arranged the June 17, 1972, burglary that ultimately led to Nixon's
1974 resignation, and later served four years and four months in prison.

The lawsuit contends Liddy has repeatedly, and falsely, claimed the break-in
was ordered not to repair a previously installed tap on DNC telephones but to
recover photos and phone numbers of Dean's fiancee. According to the lawsuit,
Liddy says Dean's fiancee was a member of a call-girl ring.

Dean, who cooperated with Watergate prosecutors and served four months in
prison, on Tuesday denied being the Watergate mastermind.

``There is not a scintilla of evidence that there was a call-girl ring at the
DNC,'' said Dean, who has recently worked as an investment banker in Beverly
Hills.

Dorsen has noted that Wells later became personal secretary to Carter.

``It defies belief that if there were an active prostitution ring operating
out of the DNC in 1971-1972, in which (Wells) played a conspicuous role, no
Democratic worker or official came forward to protect President Carter from
the political scandal of having as his secretary an alleged former madam, who
supposedly pimped for countless Democratic bigwigs,'' Dorsen said in court
papers.


Reply via email to