-Caveat Lector-

"Russian President Vladimir Putin last month dismissed reports of the
nuclear arms in Kaliningrad as "rubbish.""


<http://www.washtimes.com/national/default-2001215224952.htm>

Satellites pinpoint Russian nuclear arms in Baltics

By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

     U.S. spy satellites have located the exact position of
Russian tactical nuclear weapons in the Baltic enclave of
Kaliningrad, contradicting Moscow's contention that it had not
transferred the battlefield arms.

     Satellite photographs first revealed the transfers June 3
when the weapons were spotted aboard a Russian military train at
a seaport near St. Petersburg, according to U.S. intelligence
officials.

     A second intelligence breakthrough took place June 6 when
spy satellites detected the arrival of the nuclear arms in
Kaliningrad, said officials familiar with intelligence reports
who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

     The weapons were moved by ship from the Russian port to a
special nuclear storage bunker near a military airfield in
Kaliningrad, a small Russian enclave between Poland and Lithuania
on the Baltic Sea.

     The satellite photographs have refuted Russian government
denials about the transfer or deployment of nuclear arms in
Kaliningrad. The transfers were first reported by The Washington
Times on Jan. 3.

     "The Russians are denying it, but we know better," said one
defense official. Debate within the U.S. government has ceased on
the nuclear transfers.

     The disclosure of the tactical nuclear arms transfers
prompted statements of concern by the governments of Poland,
Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Moscow has refused inspections of
all military facilities in Kaliningrad by those governments.

     Polish Defense Minister Bronislaw Komorowski called for
inspections of Kaliningrad to determine whether the nuclear arms
were deployed there. The State Department did not support the
call for inspections, even though Poland is now a member of the
NATO alliance.

     Under an informal agreement reached between the United
States and Russia in 1992, Moscow was to remove all tactical
nuclear weapons from forward-deployed areas and said they had
done so.

     Russian President Vladimir Putin last month dismissed
reports of the nuclear arms in Kaliningrad as "rubbish."

     U.S. intelligence is still trying to determine the exact
type of the nuclear arms. They were described in reports as
either nuclear naval, ground forces or air-delivered weapons.

     The weapons in Kaliningrad are based in what the Pentagon
calls a nuclear storage site, a special facility used to house
nuclear arms.

     The intelligence photographs, gathered by the Pentagon's
array of reconnaissance satellites, confirmed suspicions dating
back to 1998 about the deployment of tactical nuclear arms in
Kaliningrad, the officials said.

     Russia has between 4,000 and 15,000 tactical nuclear
weapons, none of which is covered by formal U.S.-Russian arms
control agreements. They include short-range missile warheads,
nuclear-armed torpedoes and air-dropped nuclear bombs.

     A Pentagon spokesman told The Washington Times last month
that the deployment of tactical nuclear arms to Kaliningrad
violates Moscow's pledge to keep the Baltic region a
"nuclear-free" zone.

     The nuclear transfers were not reported in formal Pentagon
intelligence reports until December, fueling speculation among
some officials that the information was withheld from U.S.
government policy-makers for diplomatic reasons. Intelligence
officials denied the information was withheld.

     After the disclosures last month, the State Department sent
a formal diplomatic note to the Russians asking for an
explanation of the deployment.

     The Russian government replied by repeating Moscow's public
denials insisting that there were no nuclear arms in Kaliningrad,
U.S. officials said.

     Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser during the
Carter administration, said the nuclear arms in Kaliningrad are a
political problem more than a serious strategic worry.

     "It tells us something about the dogged attitudes of the
Russian military and political leaders," Mr. Brzezinski said in
an interview.

     "It's conduct you would not expect from a responsible
government that generally wants to be part of the partnership of
the European community, as Putin has indicated," Mr. Brzezinski
said.

     "No one likes to be sitting next to nuclear weapons, stored
or unstored," he said.

     But efforts by Polish and Baltic-nation governments to seek
nuclear inspections will be difficult because there are no formal
agreements allowing such reviews, Mr. Brzezinski said.

     As for Russian government denials, Mr. Brzezinski said: "The
fact that the Russian government denies it . . . is probably an
affirmation that it is true."

     Richard Perle, a senior defense official in the Reagan
administration, said the movement of the weapons would be a
concern if it is part of a Russian strategy against NATO.

     Moscow said in 1998 that it would deploy nuclear weapons
into forward areas of Europe in response to the expansion of the
NATO alliance. The 1999 expansion brought in Poland, Hungary and
the Czech Republic. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia have expressed
an interest in joining the alliance.

     As for the weapons themselves, Mr. Perle said, they are "not
a deep concern."

     "The movement of nuclear weapons from one location to
another might have troubled me in the Cold War, but not now,"
said Mr. Perle, an adviser to George W. Bush during the
presidential campaign.

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
                     *Michael Spitzer*  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to