-Caveat Lector-

<http://dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/ap/20010305/us/clinton_pardons_103.html>

Monday March 5 11:32 AM ET

Clinton Refuses Senate Pardons Talk

WASHINGTON (AP) - Former President Clinton is unlikely to accept
an offer that he be questioned privately by senators about
pardons he issued during his final hours in office, a spokeswoman
says.

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said Sunday he thought Clinton ``may
be inclined'' to accept his offer as a way of ``getting to the
basic facts.''

But it's unlikely, Clinton spokeswoman Julia Payne said Monday.
``This is not an offer he's considering at this time,'' she said.

Senate leaders are treading gingerly over the prospect of trying
to compel Clinton's testimony about his 176 last-minute pardons
and commutations. Specter said they have suggested that he and a
Democratic senator do the questioning in private.

He detailed the proposal in a letter to Clinton last week.

Specter also said he had an ``informal conversation'' with
Clinton's chief of staff, Karen Tramontano, and was told the
former president ``is thinking about it.'' Payne said Tramontano
had wanted more information about the offer.

``I think as the facts build up, the president is evaluating it
and may be inclined to come in,'' Specter said on ABC's ``This
Week.''

Committees in both the House and Senate are investigating whether
the pardons, including one granted to fugitive financier Marc
Rich, were linked to political contributions.

Specter said he suggested ``very professional questioning by me
with another Democrat, if the president chooses, in an office,
his office if he would like, getting to the basic facts.''

Were Clinton to reject the proposal, Specter said he did not know
what would happen. ``Technically there could be a subpoena. I
don't think that will happen,'' he said, citing the
``sensitivity'' of forcing a president to testify.

On Monday, the House Government Reform Committee was expected to
get more details about large donations to the William J. Clinton
Presidential Foundation, which is raising money for a library to
be built in Little Rock, Ark. The committee already has received
a list of the top donors, but was awaiting specific information,
including dates of contributions.

Rich's ex-wife, songwriter Denise Rich, contributed $450,000 to
the foundation and her friend, Beth Dozoretz, a former finance
chairman for the Democratic National Committee, has pledged to
raise $1 million for the library project.

Dozoretz refused to testify before the House committee last week
about her involvement in Rich's pardon, invoking her
constitutional right against self-incrimination. Denise Rich also
has refused to testify.

Noting the almost daily revelations about lobbying by political
donors on behalf of pardon applicants, Specter said, ``It
naturally raises a question. It doesn't come to a legal
conclusion, it won't stand up in court, but I think it is
something that ought to be answered, and, again, only the
president can give the answer.''

Specter also said that Congress may consider reporting
requirements for private foundations like the one handling
Clinton's library fund raising, and may look at more lobbying
registration requirements for people who seek things from the
president.


=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
                     *Michael Spitzer*  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to