-Caveat Lector-

                            Indoor Air Pollution From
                            Water Fluoridation
                                 http://home.att.net/~gtigerclaw/Indoor.html
                                          By George Glasser
                                               3-5-1


                           After more than fifty years and more than forty thousand
                           studies, researchers have never addressed the subject
                           of indoor fluoride pollution by residual fluorides resulting
                           from drinking water fluoridation.

                           USEPA

                           Most people are aware that outdoor air pollution can
                           damage their health but may not know that indoor air
                           pollution can also have significant effects. EPA studies of
                           human exposure to air pollutants indicate that indoor air
                           levels of many pollutants may be 2-5 times, and
                           occasionally, more than 100 times higher than outdoor
                           levels. These levels of indoor air pollutants are of
                           particular concern because it is estimated that most
                           people spend as much as 90% of their time indoors.

                           When fluoridated water evaporates, small amounts of
                           fluoride salts are formed - a milligram here and a
                           microgram there. How much of the fluoride salts are
                           retained in clothing, bedding, curtains, on floors after
                           mopping and following the numerous other household
                           activities where water is utilized? Some scientists may
                           say that residuals are so negligible that the
                           contamination is not worth considering. However, the
                           potential for build-up of the submicroscopic salts is
                           present and real.

                           The more people that live in a household, the greater the
                           potential for airborne fluoride pollution to build up. In a
                           household with infants and young children, the
                           accumulation of residual fluoride salts could be
                           exponential from washing clothes alone.

                           A home purchased in an area that has been fluoridated
                           for twenty years could be an exposure chamber filled
                           with highly toxic and bioavailable fluoride salts. These
                           salts accumulate over the long-term and the build-up in
                           the home over a period of five, ten, fifteen or twenty
                           years could be considerable.

                           As far as exposure to fluoride salts from inhalation are
                           concerned, the potential for developing adverse health
                           effects is far greater at much lower exposure levels.
                           Once lung cells are killed, they can never be replaced.
                           One microgram of inhaled fluoride salts has the capability
                           of killing millions of lung cells. Inhaled fluoride salts 
have
                           the potential of doubling physiological damage from other
                           exposures. This is in addition to potential damage from
                           any toxic partner it might be carrying when it enters the
                           lungs. Inhalation is the most effective means of
                           potentiating or synergizing the toxic effects of fluoride
                           salts.

                           Inhaled fluoride salts impact dramatically on the lungs
                           and passageways leading to the lungs. Fluoride salts
                           react very differently and more violently with moist
                           tissues than do the diluted salts added to drinking water.
                           The damage from direct application of salts is much more
                           traumatic to delicate tissues; cells are destroyed and the
                           components move on into the body, inflicting further
                           damage (potentiated effects).

                           The potential for submicroscopic fluoride salts to reach
                           near-industrial levels in the bedroom, bathroom, kitchen
                           and laundry room after five to ten years of drinking water
                           fluoridation should not be overlooked. Many homes in
                           communities fluoridated from the 1950s may have levels
                           of fluoride salts that exceed the occupational exposure
                           limits of 3 parts per million for airborne fluorides. Work 
is
                           needed to determine the species, amounts, and the
                           degree of toxicity of salts.

                           Many health agencies have conducted investigations into
                           insecticides, trichloromethanes and other contaminants
                           which may enter the home via drinking water, leaving a
                           residual build-up or becoming airborne. However, neither
                           the USEPA nor any other water fluoridation researchers
                           have investigated the potential for ambient residual
                           buildup of fluoride salts from common household
                           practices using fluoridated water.

                           Almost all water fluoridation is accomplished with
                           fluorosilicic acid or some other form offluorosilicate.
                           Fluorosilicate build-up potentiates greater health risks
                           from airborne exposure during summer months because
                           silicon tetrafluoride becomes a gas at about 90 degrees
                           Fahrenheit. The exposure threat from the ambient
                           fluorides are greater from inhalation and dermal
                           absorption than from ingestion. Virtually 100% of the
                           fluoride or fluoride compound is metabolized via
                           inhalation and skin exposure. But these factors are
                           neglected in research into drinking water fluoridation.

                           Occupational limits were developed for people working
                           an eight hour day. The average person spends almost
                           two-thirds of their time at home. Therefore, the threshold
                           for household airborne exposures and exposure from
                           ingestion should be set to much lower limits than for
                           occupational exposures.

                           Until fluoride researchers abandon their fantasy world of
                           ideal solutions and ideal experimental environments, this
                           reality will never be addressed and poses an imminent
                           health risk to people living in fluoridated areas.

                           To gain more insight into the potential adverse health
                           effects from airborne fluorides and the primary source go
                           to:

                           http://home.att.net/~gtigerclaw/Hamilton_County.htm

                           http://home.att.net/~gtigerclaw/Stupid.htm





                                            MainPage
                                         http://www.rense.com

ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to