-Caveat Lector-

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 07:20:05 -0500
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gunsafe members <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sure, blame the gun

Sure, Blame the Gun
 On the media’s love affair with the Santee school shooting.

 Mr. Kopel is the research director of the Independence Institute, & Ari Armstrong
 is the publisher of the Colorado Freedom Report. March 9, 2001 9:05 a.m.

http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel.shtml

 Sure, Blame the Gun.

 Never mind that many students in government schools are routinely tormented
 and attacked in ways that would constitute a felony (if a school principal,
rather
 than a ninth-grader, were the victim). Often, schools are so big and impersonal
 that administrators frequently don't even know there's a problem. Or schools
may
 be so sports-focused that athletes can get away with anything.

 The Santee murderer (we won't mention his name, because he doesn't deserve
 the publicity he sought) lived with his father; his mother lives on the other
side
 of the continent. She is reported to have called the young man earlier this
year.
 The killer's former girlfriend said that the killer craved his mother's attention,
but
 never got it. The mother is so minimally aware of her child that she thought
he
 played on all the sports teams. In fact, he played on no team sports.

 The killer's father apparently didn't realize his son had severe social and
emotional
 problems, didn't realize that maybe he shouldn't have access to the keys to
the
 gun safe.

 But it's the gun's fault — couldn't possibly have anything to do with parental
 responsibility. The killer told an adult and several students he was going to
shoot
 up the school. They did nothing. Blame the gun. California politicians have
passed
 some of the toughest gun laws in the nation. There's government permission and
 registration for every gun transfer - even giving an old squirrel rifle to your
cousin.
 There are bans on hundreds of cosmetically incorrect firearms; no permits to
carry
 a handgun for lawful protection - unless you've got special political connections;
 and laws requiring guns to be locked up to keep them away from people like the
 Santee murderer.

 So why is California one of the most dangerous states in the Union? Don't all
 those laws targeting law-abiding gun owners save lives?  The problem with
 California gun laws in general, and California's mandatory gun storage law in
 particular, is that they affect precisely the wrong people.

 If a father doesn't notice that his son, who is making death threats to everyone
 who will listen, has swiped a revolver, a mandatory gun-lock law like California's
 isn't going to stir him into action.

 On other hand, responsible parents who obey the law and teach their children
to
 do the same will obey the gun-lock law. These people weren't going to commit
 crimes with their firearms. Because of the gun-lock laws, these people end up
 becoming easy prey for criminals.

 In Merced, California, in August 2000, a pitchfork-wielding man attacked and
 murdered Jessica Carpenter's 7-year-old brother and 9-year-old sister while
their
 parents were not home. Jessica's father kept a gun in the home that was, in
 accordance with California law, locked in a safe. According to the family, Jessica,
 age 14, is a very good shot, and had the gun not been securely stored, Jessica
 would have been able to retrieve it and use it to fend off the murderer.

 The California mandatory gun-lock law helped kill two children in Merced. That
 same law did nothing to save the two children in Santee.

 The Merced incident may have been sensational, but it is typical of how laws
 like California's turn a family's home into a safe zone for predators. A John
Lott
 and John Whitley study compared crime, accident, and suicide trends in states
 with California-type laws, to trends in other states, while controlling for
the effect
 of numerous sociological variables. The study found no statistically significant
 reduction in accidents involving children or teenagers. Teenage gun suicide
 decreased, but not the overall teenage-suicide rate.

 There were also large increases in violent crime and homicide:
 Rapes, robberies, and burglaries rise by 9, 11, and 6 percent, respectively,
as a
 result of safe storage laws…. The fifteen states with safe storage laws would
be
 expected to experience 168 more murders in the first full year that the law
is in
 effect. The number of murders peaks in the fourth full year at 380 murders….
 During the five full years after the passage of the safe storage laws, the fifteen
 states face an annual average increase of 309 more murders, 3,860 more rapes,
 24,650 more robberies, and over 25,000 more aggravated assaults.

 The crime increase was most severe in states like California,  where violation
is
 a felony. But the victims of the California gun lock law never made the national
 news. And did you read about the four California children who were killed last
 week by a sociopath who ran them down with an automobile? Of course not. The
 media's interest in dead children depends mostly on whether those children can
 be exploited to promote bigger government.

 So don't expect a lot of editorial cartoons criticizing parents who expect schools
 to raise their children. Don't expect too many congressmen with 100% voting
 records from Handgun Control, Inc., to give a big speech worrying that so many
 parents spend less than five minutes a day talking with their children. Blame
the
 gun. A small but terrifying subculture of America's children worship the Columbine
 murderers. Do you think that Time regrets putting the two killers on its cover?
Do
 you think the national media considers for a second how many lives might be
 saved by simply refusing to broadcast the names of publicity-seeking mass
 murderers? Do you think the media has slightest regret for the saturation coverage
 given the Santee murder, and the three copycat crimes that followed within 48
 hours? Blame the gun.

 Why exercise First Amendment rights in a responsible manner, when it's easier
 to demonize the Second Amendment?

 Upon hearing the shots at Santana High School, one student grabbed a still camera
 and another grabbed a video camera to record the carnage. No one tried to tackle
 the killer during his three reloading breaks. Is it because the national media
failed
 to tell the story of the heroic high-school student who tackled the killer in
Springfield,
 Oregon, while the killer was reloading? The killer became nationally famous.
The
 hero didn't. The media lost interest in him when they found that the hero's
father
 belonged to the NRA, and the family opposed gun control.  At Columbine, teacher
 Dave Sanders was justifiably lionized for dying while trying to help students
flee.
 Most people have never heard about the adults who saved lives in Pearl, Mississippi,
 or Edinboro, Pennsylvania, by confronting and subduing the rampaging killers.

 To the national media, civilians who take forceful action -  wrestling a shooter
to
 the ground, or pointing a handgun at the shooter's head - apparently teach the
 wrong lesson: that we're not all helpless; that brave people can stop criminals.
 That's a lesson which conflicts with the enraged helplessness promoted by the
 "Million" Mom March and its mean-spirited message that the only way for children
 to be safe is for the government to crack down on law-abiding gun owners.

 Sure, blame the gun. Keep on ducking real responsibility for children's safety
and
 moral education. Teach people to be afraid, but not how to protect themselves.
 Keep on hating inanimate objects and the law-abiding people who own them.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to