>From http:

//www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/Baker022701/baker022701.html:
>
> GWB's latest Golden Lawbreaker: Dick Cheney!
> When will Burton hold hearings on this?
> By Tamara Baker
>
> SAINT PAUL, MN, Feb. 26, 2001—When I first started my "Golden Lawbreaker"
> series, even I didn't realize where it would lead.
>
> As you know, the "Golden Lawbreakers" are those friends and donors of GW
> Bush who, if President Clinton's regulations had not been undone by Usurper
> Boy and his Prince Regent Cheney, would be barred from receiving Federal
> Government contracts because of their habitual lawbreaking. As expected, the
> pro-Bush US Chamber of Commerce raised a stink (now, what was this about
> conservatives and businessmen respecting "the rule of law"?), thus giving
> Shrub's minders the cover they needed to zap the regulations within hours of
> their gaining control of the Oval Office.
>
> It turns out that a company very near and dear to Dick Cheney's heart is one
> of these Golden Lawbreakers.
>
> Yes, folks—I'm speaking of Halliburton.
>
> Here's the scoop:
>
> We all know that one of the two counts Rudy Giuliani filed against Marc
> Rich, way back when, concerned Rich's buying oil from Iran.
>
> However, it also seems that Halliburton has been caught violating President
> Clinton's 1995 executive order forbidding US companies/individuals from
> doing business with Iran:
>
> Halliburton Co., the U.S. oil-services giant until recently headed by Vice
> President Richard Cheney, has opened an office in Tehran and operated in
> Iran in possible violation of U.S. sanctions, Thursday's Wall Street Journal
> reported.
>
> Since 1995, U.S. laws have banned most American commerce with Iran.
> Halliburton Products and Services Ltd. works behind an unmarked door on the
> ninth floor of a new north Tehran tower block. A brochure declares that the
> company was registered in 1975 in the Cayman Islands, is based in the
> Persian Gulf sheikdom of Dubai and is "non-American." But, like the sign
> over the receptionist's head, the brochure bears the Dallas company's name
> and red emblem, and offers services from Halliburton units around the world.
>
> Ooops!
>
> You know, I think that the 5th Federal Judiciary Circuit's Northern Texas
> District might find this rather interesting, don't you? Perhaps someone
> should bring this to its attention.
>
> Ah, but it gets even better:
>
> .. a U.S. official said a Halliburton (HAL) office in Tehran would violate
> at least the spirit of American law. The Treasury Department's Office of
> Foreign Assets Control declined to comment on a specific company, referring
> inquiries to a Web site summary of Iran sanctions that bans almost all U.S.
> trade and investment with Iran, specifically in oil services. The Web site
> adds: "No U.S. person may approve or facilitate the entry into or
> performance of transactions or contracts with Iran by a foreign subsidiary
> of a U.S. firm that the U.S. person is precluded from performing directly.
> Similarly, no U.S. person may facilitate such transactions by unaffiliated
> foreign persons."
>
> Got that? The law was written so that certain attempts to foil it, such as
> the transparent attempts by companies like Halliburton to create fake
> foreign "shell" (or "Potemkin") companies for that very purpose, would be
> thwarted.
>
> Even out of the Oval Office, our last elected president is still going to
> give Cheney and Bush fits:
>
> An executive order signed by President Clinton in March 1995 prohibits "new
> investments [in Iran] by U.S. persons, including commitment of funds or
> other assets." It also bars U.S. companies from performing services "that
> would benefit the Iranian oil industry." Violation of the order can result
> in fines of as much as $500,000 for companies and up to 10 years in jail for
> individuals.
>
> And guess what:
>
> The Halliburton brochure in Tehran says the company has performed
> oil-drilling services on two offshore drilling contracts in the Iranian
> sector of the Persian Gulf. One is the Sirri field, being developed by
> France's TotalFinaElf SA, and the other is Phase 1 of the South Pars field,
> being developed by an Iranian company.
>
> The Halliburton brochure continues: "We are committed to position ourselves
> in a market that offers huge growth potential."
>
> Obviously.
>
> So, we know that Halliburton has already given its drilling services to two
> Iranian projects: the Sirri Field and Phase 1 of the South Pars field.
>
> I Googled for Sirri Field and here's part of what I found:
>
> In the Middle East, the Sirri E field (TotalFinaElf 60%) in Iran started
> production in February 1999 and rose to a level of 90 mb/d by year end.
>
> Hmmm. Now remember, Cheney didn't leave Halliburton until July of 2000.
> Sounds like he may have been around when both the Sirri and South Pars
> fields were drilled by the company he led, and he certainly was around when
> the drilling deals were negotiated.
>
> I next did a Google on "South Pars Phase 1 Halliburton." At the very end of
> the Google cached version of the July 2000 Menas oil newsletter, I found
> this:
>
> 5.0 Facts and Figures
>
> 5.1. Quotes
>
> The former US Defence Secretary Dick Cheney, who is currently Chief
> Executive of Halliburton, labelled present Iran-US relation as a "tragedy"
> and said that it is time to set the past crises aside. Speaking at the World
> Petroleum Congress in Calgary, Cheney said: "I hope we can find ways to
> improve mutual ties. I think one of those ways is to allow American firms to
> do the same works as other firms from other parts of the world are able to
> do now." He further added: "We are kept out of there primarily by our own
> government," noting that the US policy aims to prevent its companies from
> making large investments in Iran and that this policy is a "mistake." "While
> American companies have to sit on the sidelines, oil companies from the rest
> of the world have invested in Iran's energy sector, sometimes without
> operating the same high standards." He also remarked that unilateral
> economic sanctions were not effective in achieving political and even human
> rights goals.
> Now, again, remember, here's the story as I understand it:
>
> Marc Rich is allegedly Satan Incarnate because he bought some oil from Iran
> over twenty years ago.
>
> But Dick Cheney presided over his company's, Halliburton's, setting up a
> fake shell company so it could drill oil wells in Iranian waters, in direct
> violation of US law—and THAT is somehow just peachy-keen?
>
> Please, do me and yourselves a favor, and fax this to your Democratic
> legislators, as well as the 5th Circuit Court. Forward this by e-mail to
> your local and national media contacts. We have to do something about this.
>
> **************************************
>
> Halliburton Connected to Office in Iran --- Firm Cheney Headed Says It
> Doesn't Breach U.S. Sanctions Law
> Wall Street Journal; New York, N.Y.; Feb 1, 2001; By Wall Street Journal
> staff reporters Hugh Pope in Tehran, Iran, and Neil King Jr. in Washington;
>
> Companies:  Halliburton CoTicker:HALDuns:04-329-6920Sic:234990Sic:213112
>
> Abstract:
> A U.S. official said a Halliburton office in Tehran would violate at least
> the spirit of American law. The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign
> Assets Control declined to comment on a specific company, referring
> inquiries to a Web site summary of Iran sanctions that bans almost all U.S.
> trade and investment with Iran, specifically in oil services. The Web site
> adds: "No U.S. person may approve or facilitate the entry into or
> performance of transactions or contracts with Iran by a foreign subsidiary
> of a U.S. firm that the U.S. person is precluded from performing directly.
> Similarly, no U.S. person may facilitate such transactions by unaffiliated
> foreign persons."
>
> U.S. companies feel left behind in the race to develop Iran's 90 billion
> barrels of proven oil reserves, about 9% of the world's total, and its
> natural-gas reserves, the second largest in the world. TotalFinaElf, Italy's
> ENI SpA and Asian companies have meanwhile ignored U.S. sanctions to sign up
> a potential $8 billion in deals since Iran opened up its oil industry to
> foreign investment in 1998.
>
> A U.S. official in Washington said the U.S. was keen to sit down to talk
> with Iranian representatives "anytime, anywhere," but that Iran refuses to
> meet unless the U.S. puts aside all of its differences with Iranian
> policies.
>
> Note my new email address!:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Dan Beeton
> Free Burma Coalition
> Washington Office
> 1101 Pennsylvania Ave, SE, #204
> Washington, DC 20003 USA
> (202) 547-5985 (ph)
> (202) 544-6118 (fax)
>



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep
in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered
high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/l3joGB/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/xrOVlB/TM"><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Reply via email to