-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

The End of the Post-Cold War Era
10 April 2001

By George Friedman 
Tensions between the United States and both China and Russia have marked the 
past few weeks. This period will be remembered as the end of the post-Cold 
War period and the beginning of a new international relations era.  

Deteriorating relations with Washington led to headline-grabbing incidents 
with both great powers: the ongoing standoff over the EP-3E with China and 
the espionage tit-for-tat with Russia. Without that deterioration, these 
incidents would not have occurred. The United States would not have expelled 
hordes of Russian diplomats and the Chinese would not have intercepted the 
American spy plane, and if they did, they would have released it quickly. 

At stake is the international system’s composition. Two great powers want to 
see a more multipolar world. The one superpower understandably wants to 
maintain the status quo of a uni-polar system. 

The conflict in Kosovo was the origin for this deterioration in relations. 
Neither Moscow nor Beijing wanted NATO to intervene against Milosevic, 
believing Yugoslavia’s national sovereignty must be respected. Both powers 
felt if intervention did take place, it should consist of U.N. forces from 
neutral or secondary and tertiary powers, featuring Russian forces in a 
leading role. 

The Kosovo War convinced both Beijing and Moscow the United States was out of 
control. The Chinese sincerely believe the bombing of their embassy was 
deliberate and were struck by Washington’s disregard for consequences. From 
Russia’s point of view, the war’s ending was intolerable. The United States, 
unable to invade Kosovo, used Russian diplomatic efforts to persuade the 
Serbs to capitulate. The Russians were marginalized from the beginning, their 
diplomatic efforts brushed aside. 

While Kosovo was the key event, the underlying process has been under way for 
much longer. Russia and China both supported what they called a “multipolar” 
world in which there is a group of great powers governing the evolution of 
international affairs. Of course, the reality was a uni-polar world with the 
United States as the pre-eminent power. 

Washington took this state of affairs for granted, a hallmark of the 
post-Cold War period. The economic prosperity of the 1990s allowed the 
diplomatic nonchalance. Russia and China’s natural tendency to resist U.S. 
politico-military power was counterbalanced by their interest in maintaining 
friendly economic relations. 

A different economic reality emerged as the 1990s closed. It was inevitable 
that projection of U.S. power would, in due course, lead to resistance at 
precisely the moment when the economic benefits of good relations with the 
United States became less than the geopolitical threat posed by the United 
States. 

Around the time Russia and China became overtly concerned about their 
geopolitical situation, a government change in the United States generated a 
foreign policy that looks at the world geopolitically. 
The Russians and Chinese understand fully the American thinking: they did not 
see Clinton as nearly as altruistic as he saw himself and they understand 
Bush’s team knows what power politics is all about. Beijing saw Washington 
give Moscow a solid shove over espionage and seized on the EP-3E capture as 
an opportunity to shove back. 

The true issues are neither espionage nor aircraft, but the desire of two 
great powers to keep the one superpower out of their respective spheres of 
influence. Russia wants the United States to stay out of the Caucuses and 
Central Asia and to maintain a much lower profile along the former Soviet 
Union’s frontiers. China does not want the United States to arm Taiwan, nor 
does it want the U.S. Navy, under its doctrine of littoral warfare, moving up 
to the coast of China with ships and planes. 

The United States is not going to concede on these points. Washington wants 
to bottle up the Russians in Eurasia as far as possible and it does not 
intend to withdraw from the international waters around China. In short, the 
lines are drawn showing a very different world than existed in the past 
decade.  

We are not in a new Cold War. This is a world with few precedents, one in 
which a superpower faces multiple great powers trying to control it. The 
post-Cold War era is gone and cannot be resurrected. All that is lacking for 
this period of international relations is a good name. Something catchy will 
come to mind. 




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, 
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use 
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational 
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

<A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
rchives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send 
email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to