-Caveat Lector- From http://www.ariannaonline.com/columns/files/051001.html }}>Begin The Drug War Goes Private Filed May 10, 2001 When long-time drug warriors like Congressmen Dan Burton and Mark Souder start blasting American anti-drug efforts in Latin America, you know that something is rotten in Peru. And Colombia. And Washington. That's exactly what happened last week when representatives of the State Department, the DEA, U.S. Customs and the drug czar's office appeared in front of the House Committee on Government Reform to discuss the United States' role in the midair murder of an American missionary and her infant daughter last month in Peru. Well, not exactly ``discuss.'' More like equivocate and pass-the-buck. Just another day on the hill for drug warriors. It's as if these apparatchiks had all morphed into a famous character from that other war: Sgt. Schultz from ``Hogan's Heroes.'' They knew ``noth-ing!'' How many planes have been shot down over the years? They didn't know. Who had ultimate authority over the CIA contractors who fingered the plane? Nobody could say. How ma ny different contractors are being used in the drug war down there? Dunno. Their continual stonewalling made Burton pricklier than that mean woman on ``The Weakest Link.'' ``When Americans are killed, why does it take so long to get an explanation?'' fumed Burton. ``It seems like we're pulling t eeth to get it.'' Souder was equally apoplectic: ``We're conservative Republicans who have carried the ball for the drug war, but you're making it very difficult for us.'' But at least these guys showed up. The CIA, the key U.S. player in the Peruvian shoot-down, didn't even bother. So why all the secrecy and obfuscation? Just what is it they're trying to hide? Perhaps it's the fact that our government is funding a war being conducted by hundreds of American citizens working for private security companies, with innocuous sounding names like DynCorp, AirScan and Military Professi onal Resources Inc. It's a classic end run. When Congress agreed to fund last year's $1.3 billion aid package to Colombia, the approval came with strict limitations on the number of American military personnel that could be deployed in the r egion (500) and a prohibition on those troops engaging in combat-related tasks. But these private military contractors -- mostly made up of one-time U.S. soldiers and paid for with our tax dollars -- don't have to abide b y any such rules. It's hard to know exactly how much these corporate soldiers are costing us since many of them are being funded out of the CIA's so-called ``black budget'' -- but the dollar figure is estimated to be over one billion. DynCorp alone is being paid $600 million by the State Department to help in drug eradication and interdiction. But in February, DynCorp pilots ended up in a firefight with left-wing guerrillas. Yet the U.S. government is still claiming that we're not being dragged into Colombia's civil war. ``American taxpayers,'' says Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., a vocal critic of the private armies, ``already pay $300 billion a year to fund the world's most powerful military. Why should they have to pay a second time in or der to privatize our operations?'' Schakowsky has recently introduced legislation that would ban the government from using these private companies to help fight the drug war. ``Power exercised in secret,'' said former U.S. Sen. William Proxmire, ``especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly dangerous.'' Now the cloak is the drug war, but the secrecy and lack of accountability ar e just as dangerous. Outsourcing the war makes it possible to proceed with a policy without having to defend it in public -- or having to deal with those annoying body bags and flag-draped coffins. As Myles Frechette, the former U.S. ambassad or to Colombia put it: ``It's very handy to have an outfit not part of the U.S. armed forces, obviously. If somebody gets killed or whatever, you can say they're not a member of the armed forces.'' It's a political twist on the old philosophical conundrum: If Americans are blown to pieces in a South American forest but no one hears about it, did they really die? And if they did, would it lead to a privatized Gulf of Tonkin incident? If, as it's been said, information is the WD-40 of democracy, then suppression of information is the surest way to desiccate the lubricant that keeps the system running. Discuss this column and more in the Forum search for: ARIANNA ONLINE 1158 26th Street, P.O. Box 428 Santa Monica, CA 90403 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright © 1998-2001 Christabella, Inc. Developed and hosted by BOLD NEW WORLD End<{{ T' A<>E<>R Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the State among its hapless subjects. His task is to demonstrate repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the "democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse of objective necessity. He strives to show that the existence of taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled. He seeks to show that the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded subjects. [[For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard, Fox & Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]] <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
