|
The
accounts about the crimes of the Bush family that are second and third-hand
are easy to dismiss, and most such accounts are colored by the author's obvious
political or religious fanaticism.
One
would think with all that exposure to the alleged crimes of the Bushes they
would be easy to hate. However, I find it impossible to work up much anger over
the things they may have done. And I am particularly fond of Barbara and the
first lady's literacy advocacy.
But is
it not curious that while I am not pissed at all about the Bushes, it is the
FIRST HAND WITNESSES who are the angriest.
In
particular, it is hard for a veteran like myself to dismiss the stories told by
Lt. Col. James "Bo" Gritz, who, despite his prejudices, was a FIRST-HAND
WITNESS. And is very pissed off.
The
Bush family, as far as I know, are all human beings just trying to get through
life. All the dirty deeds they could ever do will not win them immortality or
protect them from a thorough review of their life at the time of death. No
amount of dehumanization by third parties can render them inhuman,
either.
The
question, then, in my mind: WHY ARE SO MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE
OF THEIR ACTIVITIES SO PISSED OFF ABOUT THEM?
AND
AFRAID ENOUGH OF THEM TO GO INTO HIDING, EITHER IN THIS COUNTRY OR IN THE CASE
OF MICHAEL WILLIAMS, IN EUROPE?
Unti
that question is answered, no definitive conclusions can be reached either way.
IMHO.
|
- [CTRL] RE: [CTRL] The Jeb Bush Story That Won'... Dale Stonehouse
- [CTRL] RE: [CTRL] The Jeb Bush Story That... Dale Stonehouse
- [CTRL] RE: [CTRL] The Jeb Bush Story That... Dale Stonehouse
