-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

* Veritas Vos Liberabit *
THE FEDERALIST(r) BRIEF
The Conservative e-Journal of Record

22 May 2001
Federalist #01-21.brf

To retrieve today's Brief as HTML printer-friendly text,
link to -- http://www.Federalist.com/current2001.asp

To support or sponsor The Federalist,
link to -- http://www.Federalist.com/support.asp


______--------********O********--------______
THIS WEEK'S FEATURED SITE

"I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution
of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic...."
--Congressional Oath of Office.  If you want a list of the members of
Congress who take this oath seriously, and are acting on it, visit The
Liberty Committee, and while there, sign the "Repeal 16 Petition," a
drive to repeal the Amendment that created the central government's
behemoth tax code.

Visit -- http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/


CONTENTS:
The Founders
Insight
Good News
ICTUS Imprimis
Family
Culture
Liberty
Worth Repeating -- Special Excerpts -- Clarence Thomas at CEI
The Gipper
Government
Political Futures
For the Record
Policy Pages
Reader Comments
The Last Word


______--------********O********--------______
THE FOUNDERS

"[I]t may well happen that the public voice, pronounced by the
representatives of the people, will be more consonant to the public
good than if pronounced by the people themselves, convened for the
purpose.  On the other hand, the effect may be inverted.  Men of
factious tempers, of local prejudices, or of sinister designs, may, by
intrigue, by corruption, or by other means, first obtain the
suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people." --James
Madison, Federalist No. 10


______--------********O********--------______
INSIGHT

"The world, especially the modern world, has reached a curious
condition of ritual or routine; in which we might almost say that it
is wrong even when it is right.  It continues to a great extent to do
the sensible things.  It is rapidly ceasing to have any of the
sensible reasons for doing them.  It is always lecturing on the
deadness of tradition; and it is living entirely on the life of
tradition.  It is always denouncing us for superstition; and its own
principal virtues are now almost entirely superstitions." --G. K.
Chesterton


______--------********O********--------______
GOOD NEWS

"The tongue of the wise commends knowledge, but the mouth of the fool
gushes folly." (Proverbs 15:2)  ++  "Better to be lowly in spirit and
among the oppressed than to share plunder with the proud." (Proverbs
16:19)  ++  "However, as it is written:  'No eye has seen, no ear has
heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love
him'." (1 Corinthians 2:9)  ++  "Ill-gotten treasures are of no value,
but righteousness delivers from death." (Proverbs 10:2)


______--------********O********--------______
ICTUS IMPRIMIS

"The true way to be humble is not to stoop till thou art smaller than
thyself, but to stand at thy real height against some higher nature
that will show thee what the real smallness of thy greatness is."
--Phillips Brooks (1835-1893)


______--------********O********--------______
FAMILY

"The proud claim of the right to decide who is human, and who is not,
is the heart of the evil. And the most powerful weapon against it is
the truth on which America was founded -- it is self-evident that
human beings do not have the power to make or unmake the dignity of
our fellow man according to our arbitrary will. To be human, rather,
is to belong to a community of creatures who are the common recipients
of the endowment, made by a will beyond our own, of an equal and
unalienable dignity." --Alan Keyes


______--------********O********--------______
CULTURE

"The demonization of the white male is more extreme than the
demonization of Jews by German university intellectuals during the 60
years prior to the rise of Adolf Hitler. In California, whites are a
racial minority, as they are in the world. But whites are not
considered a minority. No one is complaining about their
under-representation at Berkeley and UCLA. Whites are considered
'hegemonic' even when they are a minority because the culture and
society are white constructs. With the assimilation of whites blocked
by deconstruction in the classroom and immigration creating a majority
of 'preferred minorities' with privileged legal standing, academic
standards will not be the only white construct to bite the dust.
America's destiny lies in Third World culture." --Paul Craig Roberts


______--------********O********--------______
LIBERTY

"Americans understand the concepts of checks and balances and
separation of powers. They are aware of the importance of these ideas
to the furtherance of freedom. They know that the American ideal of
natural unalienable rights is supported by a profound belief in the
significance of individual sovereignty. Within our Constitution there
is a point where these principles converge. The people are the
ultimate check and balance to any branch, agency or person acquiring a
disproportionate amount of power. It is our venerable Second Amendment
that fuses the notion of constraint on government to the autonomy of
the solitary citizen." --James Hirsen


______--------********O********--------______
WORTH REPEATING

Excerpts from Justice Clarence Thomas's speech at the American
Enterprise Institute

I am going to speak more broadly tonight -- as a citizen who believes
in a civil society, and who is concerned because too many show
timidity today precisely when courage is demanded.

Alexander Hamilton wrote in The Federalist No. 78, "It would require
an uncommon portion of fortitude in the judges to do their duty as
faithful guardians of the constitution, where legislative invasions of
it had been instigated by the major voice of the community." This
point is rarely stressed enough.

I'd like to reflect upon those two questions: judicial principles and
the question of courage in American political life.

When interpreting the Constitution and statutes, judges should seek
the original understanding of the provision's text, if the meaning of
that text is not readily apparent.

This approach works in several ways to reduce judicial discretion and
to maintain judicial impartiality. First, by tethering their analysis
to the understanding of those who drafted and ratified the text,
modern judges are prevented from substituting their own preferences
for the Constitution.

Second, it places the authority for creating the legal rules in the
hands of the people and their representatives, rather than in the
hands of the judiciary. The Constitution means what the delegates of
the Philadelphia Convention and of the state ratifying conventions
understood it to mean; not what we judges think it should mean.

Third, this approach recognizes the basic principle of a written
Constitution. "We the people" adopted a written Constitution precisely
because it has a fixed meaning, a meaning that does not change.

It became clear in rather short order that on the very difficult
issues such as race there was no real debate or honest discussion.
Those who raised questions that suggested doubt about popular policies
were subjected to intimidation. Debate was not permitted. Orthodoxy
was enforced. When whites questioned the conventional wisdom on these
issues, it was considered bad form; when blacks did so, it was
treason.

These "rules of orthodoxy" still apply. You had better not engage in
serious debate or discussion unless you are willing to endure attacks
that range from mere hostile bluster to libel. Often the temptation is
to retreat to complaining about the unfairness of it all. But this is
a plaintive admission of defeat. It is a unilateral withdrawal from
the field of combat.

A good argument diluted to avoid criticism is not nearly as good as
the undiluted argument, because we best arrive at truth through a
process of honest and vigorous debate. Arguments should not sneak
around in disguise, as if dissent were somehow sinister. One should
not be cowed by criticism.

In my humble opinion, those who come to engage in debates of
consequence, and who challenge accepted wisdom, should expect to be
treated badly. Nonetheless, they must stand undaunted. That is
required. And, that should be expected. For, it is bravery that is
required to secure freedom.

In September of 1975, the Wall Street Journal published a book review
by Michael Novak of Thomas Sowell's book, Race and Economics. The
opening paragraph changed my life. It reads:

"Honesty on questions of race is rare in the United States. So many
and unrecognized have been the injustices committed against blacks
that no one wishes to be unkind, or subject himself to intimidating
charges. Hence, even simple truths are commonly evaded."

Even if one has a valid position, and is intellectually honest, he has
to anticipate nasty responses aimed at the messenger rather than the
argument. The objective is to limit the range of the debate, the
number of messengers, and the size of the audience. The aim is to
pressure dissenters to sanitize their message, so as to avoid being
subjected to hurtful ad hominem criticism. Who wants to be
calumniated? It's not worth the trouble.

But is it worth it? Just what is worth it, and what is not? If one
wants to be popular, it is counterproductive to disagree with the
majority. If one just wants to tread water until the next vacation, it
isn't worth the agony. If one just wants to muddle through, it is not
worth it. In my office, a little sign reads: "To avoid criticism, say
nothing, do nothing, be nothing."

What makes it all worthwhile? What makes it worthwhile is something
greater than all of us. There are those things that at one time we all
accepted as more important than our comfort or discomfort -- if not
our very lives: Duty, honor, country! There was a time when all was to
be set aside for these. The plow was left idle, the hearth without
fire, the homestead, abandoned.

We all share a reasonable and, in many ways, admirable, reluctance to
leave the safety and peacefulness of private life to take up the
larger burdens and challenges of active citizenship. The price is
high, and it is easier and more enjoyable to remain within the shelter
of our personal lives and our local communities, rather than the
larger state. To enter public life is to step outside our more
confined, comfortable sphere of life, and to face the broader,
national sphere of citizenship. What makes it all worthwhile is to
devote ourselves to the common good.

When one observes the pitched battles that rage around persons of
strong convictions, who do not accept the prevailing beliefs of
others, it is no wonder that those who might otherwise wish to
participate find more hospitable outlets for their civic interests.
When one of my friends began feeling the urge to get involved, his
spouse glared at him and said, "Don 't even think about it. We love
our life the way it is." And that is not an unreasonable perspective,
not at all. But is reasonableness always our standard of review on
this question? I hope not.

During my youth there were many wonderful sayings, now considered
trite, that provided cryptic, yet prescient guidance for my life.
Among them was one based on Luke 12:48: "To whom much is given of him
much is required." Perhaps such sentiments are embarrassing in
sophisticated company today, but I continue to believe this with all
my heart.

I do believe that we are required to wade into those things that
matter to our country and our culture, no matter what the
disincentives are, and no matter the personal cost. There is not one
among us who wants to be set upon, or obligated to do and say
difficult things. Yet, there is not one of us who could in good
conscience stand by and watch a loved one or a defenseless person --
or a vital national principle -- perish alone, undefended, when our
intervention could make all the difference. This may well be too
dramatic an example. But nevertheless, put most simply: if we think
that something is dreadfully wrong, then someone has to do something.

It goes without saying that we must participate in the affairs of our
country if we think they are important and have an impact on our
lives. But how are we to do that? In what manner should we
participate?

None of us should be uncivil in our manner as we debate issues of
consequence. No matter how difficult it is, good manners should be
routine. However, in the effort to be civil in conduct, many who know
better actually dilute firmly held views to avoid appearing
"judgmental." They curb their tongues not only in form but also in
substance. The insistence on civility in the form of our debates has
the perverse effect of cannibalizing our principles, the very essence
of a civil society.

That is why civility cannot be the governing principle of citizenship
or leadership. As Gertrude Himmelfarb observed in her book, One
Nation, Two Cultures, "[t]o reduce citizenship to the modern idea of
civility, the good-neighbor idea, is to belittle not only the
political role of the citizen but also the virtues expected of the
citizen -- the 'civic virtues,' as they were known in antiquity and in
early republican thought."

These are the virtues that Aristotle thought were necessary to govern
oneself like a "freeman"; that Montesquieu referred to as the " spring
which sets the republican government in motion"; and that the Founding
Fathers thought provided the dynamic combination of conviction and
self-discipline necessary for self-government.

By yielding to a false form of "civility," we sometimes allow our
critics to intimidate us. As I have said, active citizens are often
subjected to truly vile attacks; they are branded as mean-spirited,
racist, Uncle Tom, homophobic, sexist, etc. To this we often respond
(if not succumb), so as not to be constantly fighting, by trying to be
tolerant and nonjudgmental -- i.e., we censor ourselves. This is not
civility. It is cowardice, or well-intentioned self-deception at best.

Immanuel Kant pointed out that to escape shame and self-contempt we
must learn to lie to ourselves. These lies create a formidable
obstacle to action on behalf of truth, and one of the greatest human
accomplishments is to find a way to shatter those lies.

Pope John Paul II has traveled the entire world challenging tyrants
and murderers of all sorts, speaking to millions of people, bringing
them a single, simple message: "Be Not Afraid." He preached this
message to people living under Communist tyranny in Poland, in
Czechoslovakia, in Nicaragua and in China -- "Be not afraid." He
preached it to Africans facing death from marauding tribes and
murderous disease -- "Be not afraid." And he preached it to us,
warning us how easy it is to be trapped in a "culture of death" even
in our comfortable and luxurious country -- "Be not afraid."

Listen to the truths that lie within your hearts, and be not afraid to
follow them wherever they may lead you.

Those three little words hold the power to transform individuals and
change the world. They can supply the quiet resolve and unvoiced
courage necessary to endure the inevitable intimidation.

The war in which we are engaged is cultural, not civil, it tests
whether this "nation: conceived in liberty . . . can long endure."

The Founders warned us that freedom requires constant vigilance, and
repeated action. It is said that, when asked what sort of government
the Founders had created, Benjamin Franklin replied that they had
given us "A Republic, if you can keep it." Today, as in the past, we
will need a brave "civic virtue," not a timid civility, to keep our
republic. So, this evening, I leave you with the simple exhortation:
"Be not afraid."


______--------********O********--------______
THE GIPPER

"Atheism is as much a part of Communism as is the Gulag.  Every kind
of roadblock is thrown in the way of religion up to and including
imprisonment." --Ronald Reagan


______--------********O********--------______
GOVERNMENT

"Public anger has focused on the IRS, and the agency has committed
more than its share of mistakes and abuses. But the real culprit is
Congress. It has given those who work at the IRS the impossible task
of fairly implementing an unfair tax code and unfair tax rates. Does
Congress want to cut cheating? It should be frugal with taxpayers'
earnings. Give everyone the tax cut that they deserve. And simplify
the tax code." --Doug Bandow


______--------********O********--------______
POLITICAL FUTURES

"By the logic of some commentators hostile to President Bush's
determination to deploy defenses against ballistic missiles, the
government should stop trying to develop an AIDS vaccine. Attempts to
produce a vaccine have encountered failures and have not yet produced
a product that works 'perfectly' or 'fully.'  The day Bush announced
-- reiterated, really -- his commitment to missile defense, ABC News
said: 'He wants to spend a vast amount of money, and it doesn't matter
if the system doesn't work perfectly'." --George Will


______--------********O********--------______
FOR THE RECORD

"The Urban Institute studied 1998 tax returns and found that the state
with the least charitable giving was Massachusetts.  Mississippi,
however, though forty-ninth in the nation in average income, boasted
the country's most generous citizens, followed by other southern Bible
Belt states, the Dakotas, and heavily Mormon Utah." --The American
Enterprise


______--------********O********--------______
POLICY PAGES & POINTS OF INTEREST
(NOTE: For our subscribers with WWW access, if the URL line breaks,
please select, copy and paste the entire link address into your
browser's target address field.)

President's comprehensive energy plan as well as his speech delivered
in St. Paul, Minnesota
PRESIDENT BUSH
http://www.BushEnergy.com

Families Do Matter: Some Thoughts On The Latest Adolescent Health
Study
In Focus Paper
http://www.frc.org/papers/infocus/index.cfm?get=IF01C1&arc=yes


______--------********O********--------______
SELECT READER COMMENTS
(To submit an editorial comment or read other comments, link to:
http://www.Federalist.com/postededs.asp)

"Latin motto for Clinton Library -- 'Vidi, Vici, Vini'."

"If abortion has a deterrent on crime, imagine what the death penalty
would do to reduce crime."

"I read the story about the high-school group expelled from the White
House after pausing during a tour to pray. Then I saw Lyn Nofziger's
quote about the political correctness crowd feeling Christians are no
better than smokers. So I guess now there is nothing worse than being
exposed to 'second-hand prayer'."

"I generally agree with your perspectives and those of many of your
contributors, however, I fail to understand how the right to bear arms
is, in this day and time, one which I should feel passionate about.
There seems to me to be almost no excuse for having guns in a private
citizen's home. We are no longer a frontier nation, a cowboy culture,
a place where most of us have any need to hunt our own food. Those who
do hunt frequently don't even care to eat what they kill. I am not
particularly interested in animal rights, so that is not the issue."
EDITOR REPLIES: Indeed, your words are taken, almost to the letter,
from a speech Bill Clinton gave repeatedly -- and was echoed by
candidate Albert Gore. The Second Amendment has nothing to do with
"hunting" or the "frontier." That "palladium of rights upon which all
others rest" (Madison appointee Justice Joseph Story) is about LIBERTY
-- period. Americans who do not understand this most basic
justification for the "right to bear arms," have, indeed, lost the
fire of their patriot Founders. For shame....

"Freedom of the press should be defined as the separation of press and
money."
EDITOR REPLIES: Plenty of freedom and not much money around this
editorial shop! (That was a subtle solicitation for help!)


______--------********O********--------______
THE LAST WORD

"Of all the pols who rave and rant
There's none who rants like Traficant.
The congressman from Ohio
Is filled with bluster and with blow.
'Beam me up,' he likes to say
Of stupid things that come his way.
A Democrat, but just in name,
He won't play the liberal s game.
He takes his shots at either side.
His missiles scatter far and wide.
Because he votes so often wrong
He doesn't, say the Dems, belong.
And so he sits back all alone,
A Party of One on his throne.
And now, e'en though he's been forsook,
The feds are claiming he's a crook.
He's been indicted. Trial's next.
And Traficant is vexed, perplexed.
Vows he will fight. Says he will win.
Says come what may he won't give in.
And in the end, though he should lose
He's not the type to sing the blues.
If he must drink the bitter cup
He'll merely say, 'Just beam me up'." --Lyn Nofziger

This Week's Leftoons:
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/garner.htm
http://www.cnsnews.com/cartoon/welcome.asp

-- PUBLIUS  --


*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to