-Caveat Lector-

>PLEASEEEEEEEEEEE tell me where I may hear the right wing pro-
Republican media!!!!!!!!!!!!


Maybe you missed this one:

************

From:            radman

Sent:               Tue 5/22/2001 1:08 PM
To:              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:         [CTRL] Big media pushes news to the far right

-Caveat Lector-

 Tuesday, May 22, 2001

 Big media pushes news to the far right

 <http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/default.jsp?story=OPfuchs0506w>

 The biggest lie fed the American people by conservative pundits is that
the
 United States is dominated by the "liberal media." As if Rupert
Murdoch,
 Michael Eisner, General Electric, Time-Warner AOL and Viacom are owned
and
 operated by liberals.

 Not only are these folks ultra-conservatives, but the people they hire
to
 voice their opinions are so far to the right, they give independent
 journalism a dirty name. No, my friends, the corporate media is in the
 hands of right-wing kooks parading as moderates and pushing the
political
 envelope further and further to the right.

 That great political scientist Hannah Arendt said American democracy
would
 live or die as a result of the marketplace of ideas. If the marketplace
is
 closed down because one political philosophy predominates, than
democracy
 will die. And that has happened over a period of time because of the
 burgeoning power of media conglomerates and the destruction of
independent journalism.

 Now we are about to see another major assault on media journalism by
the
 Federal Communications Commission. The new chair of the FCC is Michael
 Powell, the son of Colin Powell.

 For decades the Supreme Court has ruled that no media company should
own
 more than one medium in a market and that television market penetration
 should be limited to no more than 35 percent. That ruling helped
provide
 competition in the marketplace and a diversity of ideas. The rulings
also
 prohibited cross-ownership of radio, newspapers and television in the
same
 market.

 But now the FCC and the appeals courts have become sympathetic to the
free
 speech rights of corporations and more skeptical of the role of
government
 in promoting diversity in the mass media. Of course, the nation's
largest
 TV networks, cable companies and other media businesses have become
 powerful financial contributors to political parties.

 Powell is invoking free speech in his interpretation of the rules
governing
 broadcast restrictions. He objects to the government imposing rules
that
 limit how many people one company can talk to. He says, "There is
something
 offensive to First Amendment values about that limitation."

 The FCC will review this rule and determine what modifications are
 warranted. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has a
 case before it that involves just that issue as Viacom, Inc., the
parent
 company of CBS, finds out whether it has to divest stations to come in
 compliance with the 35 percent cap.

 Earlier this year the D.C. appeals court threw out similar restrictions
on
 cable TV companies, an action many believe signaled a change in the
 networks' war against the broadcast limit. In that case the court
 determined that limiting the number of subscribers one company can
reach,
 impeded too heavily on free speech.

 And within a few weeks officials at the FCC said the agency will begin
to
 loosen a 26-year-old regulation restricting a company from owning a
 television station and a newspaper in the same market.

 Some consumer groups have denounced the court's decision, saying it
would
 further concentrate media power in many markets with limited
competition,
 sharply reducing the diversity of viewpoints on the airwaves and
 diminishing the number of companies.

 These rules, which the courts and Powell want to do away with, have
 protected the American public's access to news, information and
programming
 reflecting many political views, different perspectives and tastes. The
 erosion of these protections means that the ultra-conservatives will
not
 only dominate the airwaves, but monopolize it.

 What Powell and the courts are missing in all this is that since the
 beginning of radio, the federal government has regulated the airwaves,
 taking the unequivocal position that it belongs to the people, not to
the
 corporations. Businesses were allowed to broadcast using the airwaves
as
 long as they maintained certain rules and standards.

 People like Rush Limbaugh could never make it on radio because of a
rule
 that gave equal time to persons to respond to political attacks by
 commentators. Radio commentators were very careful in how they broached
 their attacks in the old days. That rule went out when Ronald Reagan
became
 president and Democrats in Congress agreed to the change.

 Perhaps the best example of where the media in this country is headed
is
 best illustrated by Jane Akre and Steve Wilson. They won the Goldman
 Environmental Prize for trying to report on the potentially cancerous,
 genetically modified hormone rBGH in milk. Under pressure from
Monsanto,
 the manufacturer, Fox Network refused to air the reports and eventually
 fired the journalists.

 Akre successfully sued Fox for violating Florida's whistle-blower law
and
 is now defending the settlement in the appeal process.  But no other
 television network picked up on that report, or approached the two to
have
 them report this important piece of news.

 We are sterilizing the news in this country and every media company is
in
 lock-step making certain that corporate America's interests are
protected
 against reporters who would challenge them by broadcasting the truth.

 <

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
=========CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
=======================================================================Archives 
Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
=======================================================================To subscribe to 
Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to