http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis/web/vortex/display?slu

g=satrdr14&date=20010714&query=dictatorship




Editorials & Opinion : Saturday, July 14, 2001

Imposing will of a president

By Philip kirk


Special to The Times

After being elected by a minority of U.S. voters, and after vowing both
before and after the election to pursue an agenda of conciliation and
cooperation, the Bush administration has demonstrated a relentless quest for
a radical and unpopular right-wing platform.

On the environmental front, despite overwhelming popular opposition, the
administration has, among other things, proposed to open up the national
monument and wilderness areas for gas and oil drilling for the sake of a few
months' supply of oil; has stricken down the limits on poisons such as
arsenic in drinking water; has attempted to strike down the requirement for
mining companies to put up clean-up funds prior to ravaging the land and
declaring bankruptcy, and has even quietly proposed opening the national
parks for oil exploration.

In addition to these home-front issues, Bush has scuttled the Kyoto treaty,
which attempted to limit the greenhouse gasses that represent the greatest
threat to civilization since the meteoric impact during the age of dinosaurs,
and in doing so has invoked universal international condemnation.

On the moral front, despite a clear majority support for the right of
individual choice, the Bush administration has initiated various attempts to
overturn Roe v. Wade, using surreptitious methods such as adding medical
benefits for the unborn fetus or embryo in the fine print of Medicare
legislation.

The administration is also attempting, through the guise of charity, to slide
religious organizations under the federal funding mat, even at the cost of
minority protections within those organizations.

On the gun-control front, after thumbing his nose at the international effort
to control indiscriminate spreading of mostly U.S.-manufactured small
firearms, Attorney General John Ashcroft has elected to provide his own
interpretation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution, a view totally
contrary to the position declared by every court of the land, up to the
Supreme Court itself, and contrary also to the policy of several previous
administrations, including Republican ones.

While individuals may differ in their own views on each of these issues, the
frightening thing about these events is not in the issues themselves, but the
way in which the Bush administration is attempting to subvert the fundamental
democratic process and the expressed will of the people of this country by
embarking on Bush's own radical right-wing agenda, and doing it by insidious
and surreptitious methods that attempt to avoid public scrutiny or
opposition.

In my recollection, there has been no administration in the past 70 years
that has made such an overt attack on the constitutional democratic process,
and every American should be outraged at what a minority-elected
administration is seeking to accomplish over the expressed will of the
electorate.

Contrary to those who believe that the U.S. government is being undermined by
U.N. subversives creeping across the Canadian border, this administration is
beginning to smell of dictatorship from within.


Reply via email to