http://www.mediamonitors.net/index.html



Good Cop, Bad Cop 

by Uri Avnery

Everyone who has seen crime movies knows them: the good cop and the bad cop.
The bad cop (say Gene Hackman) starts to interrogate the suspect. He shouts,
curses, threatens, hits him. At the right moment, the good cop (say Clint
Eastwood) enters.

"How do you dare to behave like this?" he shouts at the bad cop, "get out!"
He offers the frightened suspect a cigarette and coffee and says: "What a
beast that man is! He can do terrible things to you. Only yesterday a man
almost died during his interrogation. But I can get him off this
interrogation. Only, just to convince the boss, you must give me some little
piece of information. So who was your accomplice in the bank robbery?"

Ariel Sharon and Shimon Peres are playing now these characters for a
world-wide audience in a movie that may well win the Oscar some day.
"Excellent acting," the jury will report, "an exceptionally convincing
performance."

The bad cop, Sharon, shouts: "Hold me! I am crazy! I’ll go berserk!" It’s
easy for him to convince the audience, because they remember his previous
movies ("Blood and tears in Kibia" or "Is Gaza burning?" not to mention the
blockbuster "Darkness in Sabra and Shatilla".)

His partner is equally famous. Shimon Peres, an actor who won many prizes,
played the bad guy in his early movies ("The Way to Suez" and "The Dimona
Mystery" spring to mind), but for many years now he has been cast as the
peacemaker. Who doesn’t remember "Doves in Oslo"?

The division of roles is natural. Central Casting could not do better. Sharon
threatens the world. If let loose, he will invade the Palestinian
territories, kill Arafat, drive masses of Palestinians across the Jordan
river, perhaps invade Lebanon and Syria on the way. An earthquake will send
shudders throughout the Middle East, the regimes of Egypt and Jordan may
collapse, even Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States will totter, the oil will
catch fire, the global economy will collapse.

But all this will not happen. Why? Because Peres, the good cop, is holding
Sharon , preventing him from going berserk. He travels between the capitals
of the world, imploring presidents and prime ministers: Please, help me to
restrain that terrible person! I can’t do it if you don’t let him enlarge
the settlements and break the existing agreements, and if you try to compel
him to return to the negotiations. It’s bad, but it will prevent a
catastrophe!

The world rests assured. The leaders are afraid of Sharon, but as long as
Peres is at his side, everything is OK. Nothing really terrible can happen.

All this is playacting, of course. Peres is quite unable to prevent Sharon
from doing anything he wants to do. Nowadays, Peres is a political
lightweight, while Sharon is a heavyweight master. He could get rid of Peres
anytime, putting an end to his career forever.

So why doesn’t he go berserk? Because the American sword of Damocles is
hanging over his head. No Israeli leader can oppose the will of the United
States when it really concerns American interests. All Israelis know this.
After all, they are the only people outside the US who wave American flags on
their Independence Day.

These days, Washington is in the hands of the oil people. They are content
with "condemning" Sharon as long as he only assassinates Palestinian leaders
and enlarges the settlements. He knows very well that there is a red line and
where it is. He waits patiently for the day when he will succeed in
convincing the Americans to allow him a free hand for the great adventure, as
they did in 1982.

In the meantime, he uses Peres in order to tell his own extremist supporters
that he must "restrain himself" against his will in order to preserve
"national unity". While the good Peres crosses the oceans as a travelling
salesman, selling Sharon’s policy of "liquidations" and all the other
instruments of occupation and spreading the lie about the "generous offers"
which were refuses by Arafat.

Peres has already been awarded the third of a Nobel prize. He can now look
forward to receiving the half of an Oscar






Reply via email to