-Caveat Lector-

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Human Stem Cells ALREADY PATENTED -- US Officials in Bind
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:15:26 -0500 (CDT)
From: "VERACARE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: ?
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

VERACARE:
Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
Tel: 212-595-8974  FAX: 212-595-9086
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FYI
It may come as a shock to most folks, but the University of Wisconsin has
cornered the market, it owns the sole patent rights to primate and human
stem cells, patent # 6,200,806. The dynamic of the stem cell research debate
now moves to its inevitable commercial arena--where neither science nor
philosophy or religion have any influence.

The commercialization of human life is now taking center stage as patent
rights--intellectual property rights and contracts, not human values,
determine who and what research goes forth, be it government or
privately-funded research. The Times reports that the University's research
foundation is already suing the very biotech company that it had contracted
with.....

Does patent law override all other laws as well as our natural birthright?
Where are the ethicists ?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/17/health/genetics/17CELL.html?pagewanted=pri
nt

THE NEW YORK TIMES

AUG 17, 2001
Patent Laws May Determine Shape of Stem Cell Research
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

ASHINGTON, Aug. 16 - As they carry out President Bush's plan for government
financing of embryonic stem cell studies, federal health officials confront
a daunting challenge: United States patent 6,200,806, a claim to the human
embryonic stem cell.

The patent, held by a foundation at the University of Wisconsin, is
apparently the only one of its kind in the world, leaving the university in
such a powerful position that next week the health officials will begin
negotiations in hopes of reaching an agreement to allow federally financed
scientists broad access to the cells.

The patent, which covers both the method of isolating the cells and the
cells themselves, gives the Wisconsin foundation control over who may work
in the United States with stem cells, and for what purpose. In turn, the
foundation has granted important rights to a biotechnology company, the
Geron Corporation of Menlo Park, Calif., giving that company considerable
say over who ultimately profits from stem cell therapies.

This complex tangle of intellectual-property rights and contracts is now a
pressing concern at the National Institutes of Health, the agency charged
with putting President Bush's plan into effect. Next week, representatives
from the foundation, the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, or WARF, are
to meet with officials at the institutes to take the first steps toward
negotiating access to stem cells.

"I don't want people to see us as an 800-pound gorilla," Carl Gulbrandsen,
the foundation's managing director, said. "We will work very hard with the
government to make sure that there is access to this technology and that our
patents are not an impediment to researchers."

But many scientists fear that the foundation's restrictions might hinder
research on cells that hold promise for treating and curing some of
mankind's most devastating diseases. And though legal experts say it could
be challenged in court, the Wisconsin patent could help push stem cell
science overseas.

Mr. Bush said that 60 lines, or self- sustaining colonies, of stem cells
exist in laboratories around the world, and said that under his program,
government scientists would be free to work with any of them.

But the government does not have control over whether those cell lines get
to researchers, according to Mr. Gulbrandsen, federal health officials and
patent law experts. If the cell lines match the description in the broadly
worded Wisconsin patent, these experts say, their owners must obtain
approval from the foundation before distributing them.

That has scientists worried.

"The whole point of this, surely, is to get good cells into the hands of
researchers," said Dr. Ron D. McKay, who has conducted promising research on
mouse embryonic stem cells at the National Institutes of Health and is eager
to work with the human cells. "I think that it is unclear, in practice, how
easy it will be to get these cells."

As far as experts know, the United States is the only nation to have issued
a patent on human embryonic stem cells. The patent is valid only in this
country; the foundation has also applied for patents in Europe. And at least
two foreign biotechnology companies say their cell lines may fall outside
Wisconsin's claim and have applied for patents of their own in the United
States and elsewhere.

A patent gives its owner the right to exclude other people from making,
using, selling or importing their invention. So "researchers in other
countries have a double advantage," said Rebecca S. Eisenberg, an expert in
biotechnology and patent law at the University of Michigan. Other nations,
notably Britain, have fewer restrictions on studies of human embryos. And
scientists in other countries may still derive stem cell lines without fear
of patent infringement.

President Bush's decision may have strengthened the hands of the Wisconsin
group and Geron. By refusing to allow taxpayer money to finance creation of
new cell lines in this country, Mr. Bush reduced the chances that scientists
would derive and patent cells that might challenge Wisconsin's dominance in
the field.

"What constrains the monopoly power of a patent holder is the prospect of
new technology being developed that will make it unnecessary to deal with
them," Ms. Eisenberg said. "The president's decision limits that threat."

Embryonic stem cells, extracted from human embryos when they are still tiny
enough to fit on the tip of a sewing needle, are regarded by scientists as
the foundation of a new era of regenerative medicine, one in which doctors
might be able to use the cells to create replacement tissue grown to order.

Theoretically, the cells can be coaxed in the laboratory to grow into any
cell or tissue - insulin-producing cells to use against diabetes, for
example, or nerve cells that might treat Parkinson's disease.

Studies of embryonic stem cells in mice have been conducted for two decades,
but in 1998, Dr. James A. Thomson, a developmental biologist at the
University of Wisconsin, shook up the stem cell world by reporting that he
had isolated human embryonic stem cells.

As is customary at his university, Dr. Thomson assigned the patent for his
discovery to the research foundation, which had already obtained a patent on
the primate embryonic stem cell, after Dr. Thomson derived those cells from
rhesus monkeys.

In theory, because humans are primates, the patent covered human cells as
well. But the foundation applied for a second patent to make its claim on
human cells explicit. The patent was issued on March 13.

Shortly after Dr. Thomson's discovery, the foundation began negotiating with
Geron, which has contributed roughly $1 million to Dr. Thomson's research
and wanted to commercialize it.

"They wanted all rights," Mr. Gulbrandsen recalled. "We felt it was too much
to expect a small company to develop this technology fully, and giving them
all rights would not be fair to them or the public."

Ultimately, the foundation granted Geron exclusive rights to develop stem
cells into six cell types that are of great medical importance: liver,
muscle, nerve, pancreas, blood and bone. Ms. Eisenberg and other patent law
experts said that those rights, coupled with the Wisconsin patent, might
mean that anyone seeking to develop commercial applications of stem cells in
these six areas must negotiate with Geron first.

The relationship between the foundation and Geron, however, has become
contentious. On Monday, the foundation sued the company to block Geron's
efforts to extend its commercial rights to another 12 derivative cell types.
Geron has not commented on the suit, other than to say it is prepared to
meet with foundation officials to resolve it.

Last week, Geron's chief executive, Thomas Okarma, said he was eager to
begin collaborating with government-financed researchers.

Dr. Okarma said that academic scientists would be free to convert stem cells
into derivative cells of the types its agreement with the foundation covers.
"We would only prevent them from trying to commercialize them," he added.

So far, Dr. Thomson has developed five stem cell lines, and the foundation
has set up a nonprofit subsidiary, the WiCell Research Institute, to
distribute them. The cells are given to academic researchers under a
"materials transfer agreement"; scientists must pay WiCell $5,000 and agree
to certain restrictions.

The agreements give the foundation - and, by extension, Geron - control over
the derivative cells. One prominent stem cell scientist, Dr. Douglas Melton
of Harvard University, said he would not agree to such terms. "Those
conditions would mean that I am the ideal employee of Geron," he said. "They
don't pay my salary, they don't pay my benefits, but anything I discover
they own."

Now the health institutes will negotiate their own materials transfer
agreement with Wisconsin.. This agreement would cover only those scientists
who actually work at the institutes. Once negotiated, though, the
agreement's terms will become public, and universities may demand the same
terms for their researchers. "Our role, albeit limited, is very important,"
said Maria Freire, who directs the institutes' office that handles such
agreements. "We would like to be able to craft an agreement that allows our
scientists to use the WiCell cells and other cells without being in
violation of the patent. We think that can be done."

Meanwhile, companies in other countries are concerned that, if they
distribute their stem cells in the United States, the foundation might
charge them with patent infringement. Legal experts suggest that the
Wisconsin patent is one reason researchers have said little about many of
the 60 stem cell lines that President Bush said exist around the world; the
owners of those cell lines are probably afraid to come forward.

Those who have come forward say they have developed stem cell lines that
avoid the patent. Alan Robins, chief scientific officer of Bresagen, in
Adelaide, Australia, said his company had derived four stem cell lines at a
slightly later stage in the embryo's development than Dr. Thomson's cells.
They are different enough, Dr. Robins contended, for his company to win a
separate patent.

Another company, ES Cell International in Singapore, said it had six stem
cell lines in its possession. Robert J. Klupacs, the company's chief
executive, said it was evaluating its lines "to see if they fall within the
Wisconsin claim."

He added: "I'd like to think that sanity will prevail and this will work out
in the best interest of all stakeholders. But I imagine it will take some
time to work through."

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to