Interesting material on JFK - note his salary was $100,000 a year, and a $50,000 expense account which he refused to accept. John F. Kennedy was not CFR for in the first place, a President does not sit in such a group subservient to his people who elect him. Today this CFR is run by a man named George Manning and he is malicious - not a gentleman as they were at least gentlemen in those days. For you see when the two Rockefeller brothers died that year - we were getting in good with Egypt again and Tut's stuff over here - and when JFK was murdered, we had stuff from Tut Exhibition here too and the Pope died that year also - some think poisoned as was the little Pope who had said he ate like a canary but before article in Time hit the stand - he too was dead. This is the plot murder the Popes - three Popes or High Priests and Three Presidents within 10 year range..... So interesting item these people sent me - they could not conduct a search for me but sent the information to go into and some good stuff here. NOTE: JFK did not and would not have persecuted Cuba......who hated JFK and Castro - well Meyer Lansky and his henchmen Zionists lost by todays standards billons of dollars when Castro kicked that little weasel faced bastard Lansky out....now find out how Lansky's son got into West Point after he was involved in this hit? Meyer Lansky Russian Zionist no doubt used ADL for laundering of his crooked drug money, money from prostitution and murder inc funds. Saba Here is the report to the people given by John F. Kennedy - note his respect for the Steel Workers Union, for we had Manufacturing of Steel then.... Then consider this - Marc Rich who gave the ADl bribe money to buy a pardon and sent in his wife as a courtesan (and we all know she wasn't too hard to get nor was Clinton but hope Clinton got his money's worty) - however , it was Marc Rich who tried to destroy the Steel Workers Union......today Youngstown is desolte, this once great steel town...... See how greed works? Think Marc Rich - think JFK would have acceptd a bribe from that pig and would have permitted the ADL to approach him in such a manner? The ADL and Zionists and Jewish Mafia for they are all the same, did not like JFK and they did not like Catholics in particular as many items on the web seems to indicate. Anyway - this CFR this Manning in chrge now is a bum - and I mean a crude vulgar bum. Read up on him on the web for he is typical Zionist ADL crap-master. Go to Content | Home | Reference Desk | Speeches | Statement On The Steel Crisis President John F. Kennedy News conference April 11, 1962 Simultaneous and identical actions of United States Steel and other leading steel corporations increasing steel prices by some $6 a ton constitute a wholly unjustifiable and irresponsible defiance of the public interest. In this serious hour in our Nation's history, when we are confronted with grave crises in Berlin and Southeast Asia, when we are devoting our energies to economic recovery and stability, when we are asking reservists to leave their homes and families for months on end and servicemen to risk their lives--and four were killed in the last 2 days in Viet-Nam and asking union members to hold down their wage requests at a time when restraint and sacrifice are being asked of every citizen, the American people will find it hard, as I do, to accept a situation in which a tiny handful of steel executives whose pursuit of private power and profit exceeds their sense of public responsibility can show such utter contempt for the interests of 185 million Americans. If this rise in the cost of steel is imitated by the rest of the industry, instead of rescinded, it would increase the cost of homes, autos, appliances, and most other items for every American family. It would increase the cost of machinery and tools to every American businessman and farmer. It would seriously handicap our efforts to prevent an inflationary spiral from eating up the pensions of our older citizens, and our new gains in purchasing power. It would add, Secretary McNamara informed me this morning, an estimated $1 billion to the cost of our defenses, at a time when every dollar is needed for national security and other purposes. It would make it more difficult for American goods to compete in foreign markets, more difficult to withstand competition from foreign imports, and thus more difficult to improve our balance of payments position, and stem the flow of gold. And it is necessary to stem it for our national security, if we're going to pay for our security commitments abroad. And it would surely handicap our efforts to induce other industries and unions to adopt reasonable price and wage policies. The facts of the matter are that there is no justification for an increase in steel prices. The recent settlement between the industry and the union, which does not even take place until July 1st, was widely acknowledged to be noninflationary, and the whole purpose and effect of this administration's role, which both parties understood, was to achieve an agreement which would make unnecessary any increase in prices. Steel output per man is rising so fast that labor costs per ton of steel can actually be expected to decline in the next 12 months. And in fact, the Acting Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics informed me this morning that, and I quote, "employment costs per unit of steel output in 1961 were essentially the same as they were in 1958." The cost of the major raw materials, steel scrap and coal, has also been declining, and for an industry which has been generally operating at less than two-thirds of capacity, its profit rate has been normaL and can be expected to rise sharply this year in view of the reduction in idle capacity. Their lot has been easier than that of one hundred thousand steel workers thrown out of work in the last 3 years. The industry's cash dividends have exceeded $600 million in each of the last 5 years, and earnings in the first quarter of this year were estimated in the February 28th Wall Street Journal to be among the highest in history. In short, at a time when they could be exploring how more efficiency and better prices could be obtained, reducing prices in this industry in recognition of lower costs, their unusually good labor contract, their foreign competition and their increase in production and profits which are coming this year, a few gigantic corporations have decided to increase prices in ruthless disregard of their public responsibilities. The Steelworkers Union can be proud that it abided by its responsibilities in this agreement, and this Government also has responsibilities which we intend to meet. The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission are examining the significance of this action in a free, competitive economy. The Department of Defense and other agencies are reviewing its impact on their policies of procurement. And I am informed that steps are under way by those members of the Congress who plan appropriate inquiries into how these price decisions are so quickly made and reached and what legislative safeguards may be needed to protect the public interest. Price and wage decisions in this country, except for a very limited restriction in the case of monopolies and national emergency strikes, are and ought to be freely and privately made. But the American people have a right to expect, in return for that freedom, a higher sense of business responsibility for the welfare of their country than has been shown in the last 2 days. Some time ago I asked each American to consider what he would do for his country and I asked the steel companies. In the last 24 hours we had their answer. John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library - Columbia Point - Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Tel: 1-877-616-4599 Fax: 617-929-4538 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library Foundation - Columbia Point - Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Tel: 617-929-1200 Fax: 617-436-3395 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit NARA Page created June 6, 1996 updated: June 17, 2001 Home | Reference Desk | Speeches | Top of Page |
Dear Ms Jones, Here are some useful sites: http://www.cfr.org http://www.ipl.org/ref/POTUS/jfkennedy.html Thanks for your understanding. Figen Sahin/IRC Director American Information Resource Center American Embassy Ankara, Turkey Tel: 90-312-4688082 Fax: 90-312-4676967 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.usemb-ankara.org.tr 'Measure a thousand times and cut once' Turkish Proverb This e-mail is: UNCLASSIFIED -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: JFK & CFR Thought this was American site for information? Needed to know this because the fact remains this comes up now and then - that John F. Kennedy was member of the CFR. Will contact US CFR group - do not remember how I got your address but was curious. No need for a search but I do need the official membership list for 1963 and it should be obvious why - this is the year JFK was murdered.....was he murdered because he was CFR or because he was NOT CFR. That, is the question. Thank you for your very kind response. I do not want to put anybody to trouble over this but I did not subscribe to CFR Foreign Affairs only but for a few years and this thick publication did carry members at one time. Am just a researcher attempting to find out IF the CFR was involved in the assassinaation of JFK or IF JFK was assassinated because he was CFR? Did not realize you were in Turkey, Colleen Jones
