-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.ahram.org.eg/weekly/2001/549/op9.htm

}}}>Begin
 Al-Ahram Weekly Online
30 August  - 5 September 2001
Issue No.549
Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875
Current issue | Previous issue | Site map
Propaganda and war
The first step is to restore the Palestinians' history and humanity, writes
Edward Said
 Never have the media been so influential in determining the course of war as
during the Al-Aqsa Intifada, which, as far as the Western media are
concerned, has essentially become a battle over images and ideas. Israel
has already poured hundreds of millions of dollars into what in Hebrew is
called hasbara, or information for the outside world (hence, propaganda). This
has included an entire range of efforts: lunches and free trips for influential
journalists; seminars for Jewish university students who over a week in a
secluded country estate can be primed to "defend" Israel on the campus;
bombarding congressmen and -women with invitations and visits; pamphlets
and, most important, money for election campaigns; directing (or, as the
case requires, harassing) photographers and writers of the current Intifada
into producing certain images and not others; lecture and concert tours by
prominent Israelis; training commentators to make frequent references to the
Holocaust and Israel's predicament today; many advertisements in the
newspapers attacking Arabs and praising Israel; and on and on. Because so
many powerful people in the media and publishing business are strong
supporters of Israel, the task is made vastly easier.
Although these are only a few of the devices used to pursue the aims of every modern 
government, whether democratic or not, since the 1930s and '40s -- to produce consent 
and approval on the part of the consumer of news -
- no country and no lobby more than Israel's has used them in the US so effectively 
and for so long.
Orwell called this kind of misinformation newspeak or doublethink: the intention to 
cover criminal actions, especially killing people unjustly, with a veneer of 
justification and reason. In Israel's case, which has always
 had the intention to silence or make Palestinians invisible as it robbed them of 
their land, this has been in effect a suppression of the truth, or a large part of it, 
as well as a massive falsification of history. What
for the past few months Israel has successfully wanted to prove to the world is that 
it is an innocent victim of Palestinian violence and terror, and that Arabs and 
Muslims have no other reason to be in conflict with Isra
el except for an irreducibly irrational hatred of Jews. Nothing more or less. And what 
has made this campaign so effective is a long-standing sense of Western guilt for 
anti-Semitism. What could be more efficient than to
displace that guilt onto another people, the Arabs, and thereby feel not only 
justified but positively assuaged that something good has been done for a 
much-maligned and harmed people? To defend Israel at all costs -- eve
n though it is in military occupation of Palestinian land, has a powerful military, 
and has been killing and wounding Palestinians in a ratio of four or five to one -- is 
the goal of propaganda. That, plus going on with w
hat it does, but seeming to be a victim just the same.
Without any doubt, however, the extraordinary success of this unparalleled and immoral 
effort has been in large part due not only to the campaign's carefully planned and 
executed detail, but to the fact that the Arab side
 has been practically non-existent. When our historians look back to the first 50 
years of Israel's existence, an enormous historical responsibility shall rest 
damningly on the shoulders of the Arab leaders who have crimi
nally -- yes, criminally -- allowed this to go on without even the most meagre and 
half-hearted response. Instead, each of them has fought each of the others, or has 
relied on the hopelessly self-serving theory that by tr
ying to ingratiate themselves with the American government (even becoming clients of 
the US) they would assure themselves of longevity in power, regardless of whether Arab 
interests were being served or not. So deeply ing
rained has this notion become that even the Palestinian leadership has subscribed to 
it, with the result that as the Intifada rolls on, the average American hasn't the 
slightest inkling that there is a narrative of Palest
inian suffering and dispossession at least as old as Israel itself. Meanwhile Arab 
leaders come running to Washington begging for American protection without even 
understanding that three generations of Americans have bee
n brought up on Israeli propaganda to believe that Arabs are lying terrorists and that 
it is wrong to do business with them, let alone protect them.
Since 1948, Arab leaders have never bothered to confront Israeli propaganda in the US. 
All the immense amounts of Arab money invested in military spending (first on Soviet, 
then Western arms) have come to nought because A
rab efforts have been neither protected by information nor explained by patient, 
systematic organising. The result is that literally hundred of thousands of lost Arab 
lives have gone for nothing, nothing at all. The citiz
ens of the world's only superpower have been led to believe that everything Arabs do 
and are is wasteful, violent, fanatical and anti-Semitic. Israel is "our" only ally. 
And so $92 billion in aid since 1967 have gone unqu
estioningly from the US taxpayer to the Jewish state. As I said earlier, a total 
absence of planning and thought vis-à-vis the US political and cultural arena is 
hugely (but not exclusively) to blame for the astounding am
ount of Arab land and lives lost to Israel (subsidised by the US) since 1948, a major 
political crime which I hope the Arab leaders one day answer for.
I recall that during the siege of Beirut in 1982, a large non-governmental group of 
very successful Palestinian businessmen and prominent intellectuals gathered in London 
to establish an endowment to help Palestinians on
all levels. With the PLO trapped in Beirut and incapable of doing much, it was felt 
that a mobilisation of this sort might help us to help ourselves. I also recall that 
as the funds were quickly gathered, a decision was m
ade after much discussion that fully half the money would go for information in the 
West. It was felt that since -- as usual -- Palestinians were being oppressed by 
Israel with scarcely a voice lifted in the West to suppo
rt the victims, it was imperative that money should be spent for advertisements, media 
time, tours and the like in order to make it more difficult to kill and further 
oppress Palestinians without complaint or awareness. T
his was especially important, we felt, in America, where taxpayers' money was being 
spent to subsidise Israel's illegal wars, settlements, and conquests. For about two 
years, this policy was followed; then, for reasons I
have never fully understood, efforts to help the Palestinians in the US were abruptly 
terminated. When I asked why, I was told by a Palestinian gentleman who had made a 
fortune in the Gulf that "throwing money away" in Am
erica was a waste. The philanthropy now continues exclusively for the occupied 
territories and Lebanon, where this association does much good, but very little in 
comparison with the projects funded by the European Union a
nd numerous American foundations.
Some weeks ago the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), by far the 
largest and most effective Arab-American organisation in the United States, 
commissioned a public opinion poll on current American perspecti
ves on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. A very wide and deep sample of the population 
was polled, with quite startling, not to say disheartening results. Israelis are still 
believed to be a pioneering democratic people,
even though no Israeli leader did very well in the poll. Seventy-three per cent of the 
American people approve of the idea of a Palestinian state, a very surprising result. 
The interpretation of that statistic is that whe
n you ask an educated American who watches television and reads elite newspapers 
whether s/he identifies with the Palestinian struggle for independence and freedom, 
the answer is mostly yes. But if the same person is aske
d what his idea is about Palestinians, the answer is almost always negative -- 
violence and terrorism. Images of the Palestinians seem to be that they are 
uncompromising, aggressive, and "alien," that is, not like "us." E
ven when asked about the stone-throwing young people, whom we believe are Davids 
fighting against Goliath, most Americans see aggression rather than heroism. Americans 
still blame the Palestinians for obstructing the peac
e process, Camp David most particularly. Suicide bombing is viewed as "inhuman" and is 
condemned universally.
What Americans think of Israelis is not a great deal better, but there is a much 
greater identification with them as people. The most disturbing thing is that hardly 
any of the questioned Americans knew anything at all ab
out the Palestinian story, nothing about 1948, nothing at all about Israel's illegal 
34-year military occupation. The main narrative model that dominates American thinking 
still seems to be Leon Uris's 1950 novel Exodus.
Just as alarming is the fact that the most negative things in the poll were what 
Americans thought and said about Yasser Arafat, his uniform (seen as needlessly 
"militant"), his speech, his presence.
Overall, then, the conclusion is that Palestinians are viewed neither in terms of a 
story that is theirs, nor in terms of a human image with which people can easily 
identify. So successful has Israeli propaganda been that
 it would seem that Palestinians really have few, if any positive connotations. They 
are almost completely dehumanised.
Fifty years of unopposed Israeli propaganda in America have brought us to the point 
where, because we do not resist or contest these terrible misrepresentations in any 
significant way with images and messages of our own,
we are losing thousands of lives and acres of land without troubling anyone's 
conscience. The correspondent of the Independent, Phil Reeves, wrote passionately on 
27 August that Palestinians are dying or being crushed by
Israel and the world looks on silently.
It is therefore up to Arabs and Palestinians everywhere to break the silence, in a 
rational, organised and effective way, not by shooting off guns or by wailing or 
complaining. God knows we have reason to do all of the ab
ove, but cold logic is necessary now. In the American mind, analogies with South 
Africa's liberation struggle or with the horrible fate of the Native Americans most 
emphatically do not occur. We must make those analogies
above all by humanising ourselves and thus reversing the cynical, ugly process whereby 
American columnists like Charles Krauthammer and George Will audaciously call for more 
killing and bombing of Palestinians, a suggesti
on they would not dare do for any other people. Why should we passively accept the 
fate of flies or mosquitoes, to be killed wantonly with American backing any time war 
criminal Sharon decides to wipe out a few more of us
?
To that end I was pleased to learn from ADC President Ziad Asali that his organisation 
is about to embark on an unprecedented public information campaign in the mass media 
to redress the balance and present the Palestinia
ns as human beings -- can you believe the irony of such a necessity? -- as women who 
are teachers and doctors as well as mothers, men who work in the field and are nuclear 
engineers, as people who have had years and years
 of military occupation and are still fighting back. (Incidentally, one astounding 
result of the poll is that less than three or four per cent of the sample had any idea 
that there was an Israeli occupation in the first p
lace. So even the main fact of Palestinian existence has been obscured by Israeli 
propaganda). This effort has never before been made in the US: there have been 50 
years of silence, which is about to be broken.
Even though it is modest, the announced ADC campaign is also a major step forward. 
Consider that the Arab world seems to be in a state of moral and political paralysis, 
its leaders encumbered by their ties both to Israel
and, more important, to the US, their people kept in a state of anxiety and 
repression. As they and their brave Lebanese comrades did in 1982 when 19,000 were 
killed by Israeli military power, Palestinians in Gaza and the
 West Bank are dying not only because Israel has the power to do so with impunity, but 
because for the first time in modern history, the active alliance between propaganda 
in the West and military force worked out by Isra
el and its supporters, has enabled the sustained collective punishment of Palestinians 
with American tax dollars, $5 billion of which go to Israel annually. Media 
representations of Palestinians show them with neither his
tory nor humanity, as aggressive rock-throwing people of violence, and have made it 
possible for the dim-witted but politically astute George Bush to blame the 
Palestinians for violence. This new ADC campaign sets out to
restore their history and humanity, to show them (as they have always been) as people 
"like us," fighting for the right to live in freedom, to raise their children, to die 
in peace. Once even the glimmerings of this story
 penetrate the American consciousness, the truth will, I hope, begin to dissipate the 
vast cloud of evil propaganda with which Israel has covered reality. Since it is clear 
that the media campaign can only go so far, then
 the hope is that Arab Americans will feel empowered enough to enter the political 
battle in the US to try to break, modify, or fray the link that binds US policy so 
tightly to Israel. And then, we can hope again.



Recommend this page
© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to