-Caveat Lector-
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : North America
The political roots of the terror attack on New York and Washington
By the Editorial Board
12 September 2001
Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author
The World Socialist Web Site unequivocally condemns the terrorist attacks
on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Those responsible for the
hijacking of four commercial passenger aircraft and their conversion into
flying bombs are guilty of mass murder. Nothing of a socially progressive
character will be achieved on the basis of such an indiscriminate and callous
destruction of human life.
These acts of homicidal terrorism manifest a toxic combination of
demoralized pessimism, religious and ultra-nationalist obscurantism, and, it
must be added, political opportunism of the vilest character. Terrorist
organizations—notwithstanding their anti-American rhetoric—base their
tactics on the illusion that random acts of horrific violence will compel the US
ruling class to shift its policies. Thus, in the final analysis, they hope to
make a deal with Washington.
However it seeks to justify itself, the terrorist method is fundamentally
reactionary. Far from dealing a powerful blow against imperialist militarism,
terrorism plays into the hands of those elements within the US
establishment who seize on such events to justify and legitimize the resort
to war in pursuit of the geopolitical and economic interests of the ruling elite.
The murder of innocent civilians enrages, disorients and confuses the public.
It undermines the struggle for the international unity of the working class, and
counteracts all efforts to educate the American people on the history and
politics that form the background to contemporary events in the Middle East.
Nevertheless, our condemnation of Tuesday’s terrorist outrages does not in
the slightest imply any lessening of our principled and irreconcilable
opposition to the policies of the US government. Anyone who wishes to
understand the why and wherefore of yesterday’s events must study the
historical and political record of the US in the Middle East, especially over
the last 30 years. The unrelenting efforts of American imperialism to secure
its domination over the oil resources of the region, which has entailed,
among other things, unstinting support for the Israeli state’s oppression of
the Palestinian people, has placed the United States in violent opposition to
the legitimate and irrepressible democratic, national and social aspirations of
the Arab masses.
In the immediate aftermath of Tuesday’s events, politicians, editorialists and
media pundits have declared over and over that Americans must recognize
that the destruction of the World Trade Center means the United States is at
war and must act accordingly. But the fact of the matter is that the US
government has been engaged in direct warfare in the Middle East, in one
form or another, for the better part of two decades.
Putting aside the massive material aid that it provides for Israeli military
operations, the United States has been bombing one or another Middle
Eastern country almost continuously since 1983. US bombers and/or
battleships have attacked Lebanon, Libya, Iraq, Iran, the Sudan and
Afghanistan. Without actually declaring war, the United States has
conducted military operations against Iraq for nearly 12 years. The ongoing
daily bombings of Iraq are barely mentioned in the American media, which
has made no attempt to ascertain the total number of Iraqis killed by US
bombs since 1991.
Given this bloody record, why should anyone be surprised that those who
have been targeted by the United States have sought to strike back?
The same media that is now screaming for blood has routinely applauded the
use of violence against whatever country or people are deemed to be
obstacles to US interests. Let us recall the words of New York Times
columnist Thomas Friedman, who had this to say to the Serbian people
during the US bombing campaign in 1999: “It should be lights out in
Belgrade: every power grid, water pipe, road and war-related factory has to
be hit.... [W]e will set your country back by pulverizing you. You want 1950?
We can do 1950. You want 1389? We can do 1389.”
The foreign policy of the US is a mixture of cynicism, brutality and
irresponsibility. Washington has pursued a course that has inflamed the
hatred of large sections of the world’s population, creating an environment in
which recruits can be found for bloody terrorist operations. In rare moments
of candor, foreign policy specialists have acknowledged that the actions of
the United States provoke hatred and the desire for retribution. During the
Balkan War, former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger stated: “We’ve
presented to the rest of the world a vision of the bully on the block who
pushes a button, people out there die, we don’t pay anything except the cost
of a missile ... that’s going to haunt us in terms of trying to deal with the rest
of the world in the years ahead.”
This insight has not prevented the same Eagleburger from declaring Tuesday
night that the United States should respond to the destruction of the World
Trade Center by dropping bombs immediately on any country that might have
been involved.
George W. Bush’s address to the nation Tuesday evening epitomized the
arrogance and blindness of the American ruling class. Far from America
being “the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world,” the US
is seen by tens of millions as the main enemy of their human and
democratic rights, and the main source of their oppression. The American
ruling elite, in its insolence and cynicism, acts as if it can carry out its
violent enterprises around the world without creating the political conditions
for violent acts of retribution.
In the immediate aftermath of Tuesday’s attacks, US authorities and the
media are once again declaring that Osama bin Laden is responsible. This is
possible, although, as always, they present no evidence to back up their
claim.
But the charge that bin Laden is the culprit raises a host of troubling
questions. Given the fact that the US has declared this individual to be the
world’s most deadly terrorist, whose every move is tracked with the aid of the
most technologically sophisticated and massive intelligence apparatus, how
could bin Laden organize such an elaborate attack without being detected?
An attack, moreover, against the same New York skyscraper that was hit in
1993?
The devastating success of his assault would indicate that, from the
standpoint of the American government, the crusade against terrorism has
been far more a campaign of propaganda to justify US military violence
around the world than a conscientious effort to protect the American people.
Moreover, both bin Laden and the Taliban mullahs, whom the US accuses of
harboring him, were financed and armed by the Reagan-Bush administration
to fight pro-Soviet regimes in Afghanistan in the 1980s. If they are involved in
Tuesday’s operations, then the American CIA and political establishment are
guilty of having nurtured the very forces that carried out the bloodiest attack
on American civilians in US history.
The escalation of US militarism abroad will inevitably be accompanied by
intensified attacks on democratic rights at home. The first victims of the war
fever being whipped up are Arab-Americans, who are already being subjected
to death threats and other forms of harassment as a result of the media
hysteria.
The calls from both Republican and Democratic politicians for a declaration
of war foreshadow a more general crackdown on opponents of American
foreign policy. General Norman Schwarzkopf, who commanded American
troops in the 1991 invasion of Iraq, spoke for much of the political and
military elite when he declared on television that the war on alleged terrorist
supporters should be conducted inside as well as outside the borders of the
US.
It is the policies pursued by the United States, driven by the strategic and
financial interests of the ruling elite, which laid the foundations for the
nightmare that unfolded on Tuesday. The actions now being contemplated by
the Bush administration—indicated by the president’s threat to make “no
distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who
harbor them”—will only set the stage for further catastrophes.
Copyright 1998-2001
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
