--- Brian Downing Quig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fletcher Prouty and Theodore Hershel believed that
> the oil would keep those in
> the Middle East fighting.  Do you find them
> simplistic, unhistorical or
> driveling?
>
> Hershel, who was the Father of the Jewish Homeland,
> did not want it located in
> Palestine because he said already tortured Jews
> would have no peace there
> because of the oil.  He advocated the Sudan where
> there is also ancient Jewish
> history and a vigorous Jewish faith today.
>
> I have many African friends who are Coptic
> Christians, who are essentially
> Jewish Christians.  But I am not talking about
> beliefs.  I am saying economic
> motives supersede beliefs and the latter are given
> in the news and diplomacy
> only as excuses to conceal ugly economic motives.
>
> I have Fletcher Prouty's article THE MID EAST
> CAULDRON which was referred to
> earlier.  I could not find it on the exceptional
> site http://www.prouty.org but
> I know it is included on the Prouty CE.  If someone
> else has this please post it
> now.
>
Eretz-Israel, birthplace of the Jewish people, was
proclaimed the independent State of Israel on May
14,1948.  On the next day war broke out between Israel
and it's Arab neighbors.  During that same year Israel
closed the mammoth Iraqi oil pipeline at it's
Meriterrarean terminus in Haifa.  This shut off the
oil being exported from the enormous oil fields of
Kirkuk, in Iraq.  This was an omen of enormous
significance of things to happen in years to come.  In
fact, this may be true reason for the origin of this
barrier nation at that crucial time.

Because this most important oil pipeline from Iraq
transited territory claimed by the new State, Israel
could claim the option to charge Iraq for transit
fees; or to dent the right of passage altogether.
Israel choose the latter and demonstrated to the world
the power of the strategies barrier role of the
non-producing states among those that do.  This action
was not without precedent in the Middle East, for the
same commercial reasons, and with somewhat similar
earth-shaking results.

The Turkish army, under Mohammed II, captured
Contstantinople and ended the East Roman Empire in
1463.  Within a few years the victorious Turks had
virtually closed the vital spice trade routes between
the merchants of Europe and the Far East.  The transit
costs charged by the Turks for caravan passage were so
exorbitant that European merchants banded together to
finance such voyages as that of Christopher Columbus
in 1492.  They had to discover an alternative route to
the Far East sources of spices.  Without
refrigeration, spices were a necessity to the
Europeans for the preservation of food.  Israel's
action in closing the pipeline along the paths of
those ancient trade routes in 1948 forced the oil
producers to turn to super-tankers for the transport
of oil from sites in the Persian Gulf region around
the Cape of Good Hope to their principal markets in
Europe... extra thousands of miles.

The significance of this politically inspired dynamite
was not overlooked in the Board Rooms of the "Seven
Sisters" oil companies and the oil producing nations.
>From that day on, the pipeline networks of the Middle
East were vulnerable to Israeli attacks, and the new
State of Israel had become a willing pawn in the
biggest game of all... the battle for money and power.
 This action proved that a closed pipeline almost
always meant immediate higher prices for oil.  That
was 1948.

On his way home from the Yalta Conference in Feb.
1945, at the height of World War II action, President
Franklin D. Roosevelt met with King `Abdal-`Aziz al
Sa'ud (Ibn Saud) aboard the US Navy cruiser "Quincy"
in the Red Sea.  Earlier, Roosevelt had directed
construction of a 50,000 barrel per day refinery at
Ras Tanura in 1943... during the Cairo Conference...
to assure Saudi Arabian oil availability during World
War II.  Although the pursuit of victory was uppermost
in the President's mind in 1943, he knew only too well
that the Allies could not win the war, and the peace
thereafter, without oil, and Saudia Arabia meant oil
in boundless amounts.

During 1945, before the end of WWII, Texaco and Socal
(Standard Oil of California), working on a war-time
accelerated basis, had organized the Trans-Arabian
Pipeline Company known as TAPLINE.  It was said at
that time that the planning of the route of this
strategic pipeline involved difficult diplomacy
because of the mounting tension between Arabs and
Jews.  The pipeline planners feared Jewish
interference with the vital operation of that crucial
pipeline if it's route was designed to cross on, or
near, potential Jewish territory... even in 1945.
(Source:  "The Seven Sisters" by Anthony Samson).
This was a grave threat in time of war from a source
that ought to have been cooperative.

Actually, construction of TAPLINE was halted by the
first Arab-Israeli war in 1948, until an alternative
route avoiding Israel could be found.  Finally, in
1948, Syria and Lebanon permitted the line to run from
Saudia Arabia via Jordan, Syria and Lebanon to Sidon
on to the Mediterranean coast of  Lebanon.  It should
be noted that this route, and it's necessity,
increased Syria's leverage for transit fees.

The enormous potential value of Saudia Arabian oil was
well known in the highest echelons of the government
of the United  States.  Although the kingdom of Saudia
Arabia had not been created until September, 1932, a
New Zealander, Major Frank Holmes, had obtained a
concession for more than 30,000 square miles in the
Al-Hsa Province of eastern Arabia in 1923 from King
Ibn Saud - the dominant tribal ahaykh.  This
concession and a later one, 1925, were consolidated in
the name of the Eastern and General Syndicate.  This
syndicate eventually turned into the syndicate in
1927.  Because of an internal oil industry problem,
Gulf was required to re-assign its option to Socal in
1928.

Jurisdictional problems with the British oil interests
in the Middle East, delayed until November 1932, only
two months after the creation of that country, Socal's
first step in approaching the new Saudi Arabian
government.  The establishment of that government was
essential to American interests.  It is entirely
possible that the creation of the State of Saudia
Arabia, only a few short months before was brought
about by American interest in the petroleum prospects
of that valuable spread of sand.  Finally, the
Concession Agreement was signed in Jiddah, on May 29,
1933, by the Minister of Finance for the Kingdom and
by a Socal representative, Lloyd N. Hamilton.  This
agreement was ratified by the Saudi Arabian government
by Royal Decree issued on July 7, 1933.  In November
1933 this concession was assigned to the California
Arabian Standard Oil Company (CASOC).  This company
name was changed on January 31, 1944, to it's more
appropriate title... Arabian American Oil Company
(ARAMCO); the most profitable corporation ever created
by man.  It was this series of steps that led to the
potential danger of the Arab-Israel hostilities...
years before the creation of the state of Israel in
1948.

The safety of Middle Eastern oil fields was not a new
concern.  The British army had occupied what is now
Iraq, on Nov.6,1914, "to assure the safety of the oil
fields at Mosual and Kirkuk" and the safety of the
great refinery of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company at
Abadan.  Not many years later, May 1918, the British
occupied Kirkuk and later that year they took over the
oil facilities at Masul.

An Anglo-German group had formed the Turkish Petroleum
Company in 1914.After WW I, following the defeat of
Germany and the removal of Turkey from the region now
called Iraq.  British, Dutch, French, and American
interests formed the Iraq Petroleum Company, better
known as IPC.  One of the largest oil strikes of all
time occurred at Baba Gurgar in Kirkuk in 1927.  The
natural market for that oil was Europe.  In 1931, the
IPC ordered the construction of a massive pipeline
complex from these fields to the Mediterranean.  The
original pipeline runs to Rutba, in the far western
region of Iraq, to a fork.  One system goes to Tripoli
on the north Lebanon coast; and the other system goes
to Haifa in what was then Palestine.  This latter was
the first pipeline closed by Israel in 1948.  It was
not the last.

In 1952 the IPC opened a new 30 inch pipeline across
Syria to Baniyas on the Syrian Mediterranean coast.
This line avoided Israel and was planned to make up
for the loss of the Hiafa terminus.  They opened a
shorter pipeline, in 1951, from Zubair to Fao on the
Persian Gulf to give them, what they hoped would be,
an unthreatened outlet over their own land.  All told,
Iraq had exported twenty nine million tons of oil in
1954 when oil was selling for somewhere around $1.70
per 42 gallon barrel.  By 1956 Iraq was producing
633,000 barrels a day.

Oil is mentioned briefly in Genesis, and throughout
the Old Testament.  Noah smeared his ark with "pitch"
or "bitumen", "within and without".  It was produced
by the ancient Chinese from wells drilled with bamboo
"pipes".  Ancient peoples used petroleum as mortar,
for waterproofing, as medicine and in some cases as
fuel for lamps.  It was not until 1857 that the first
commercial well was drilled in Romania.

The first American well was drilled, for the specific
purpose of finding oil, near seepages along Oil Creek,
Venango County, Pennsylvania under the supervision of
"Colonel" Edwin L. Drake  The Drake well struck oil at
a depth of sixty nine feet.  This well launched an
industry... one of the worlds largest and certainly
its most lucrative, powerful and dominant.

On September 22nd 1932, the land known as the al-Hasa
Province became a part of the new nation of Saudia
Arabia.  The first American oil prospectors stepped
ashore at Jubail, on the eastern shore just north of
Ras Tanura, on Sept 23rd 1933.  From a low hill just
south of Jubail they could see the island of Bahrain
some twenty-five miles to the east, in the Gulf.

With the aid of camel transport they traveled south to
the domal geologic structure that could mean oil.
They called this the Damman Dome.  The most prominent
hill in the area is Jabal Dhahran, a name that now
means petroleum in abundance.  By the end of 1933
there were eight oil-men on site working a 320,000
square mile concession.  By the summer of 1934 it had
been decided to test the Damman Dome.  One of the
petroleum engineers at Dhahran at that time was Floyd
Ohliger, a man I met there in November 1943 and again
in 1952.

Six test wells were drilled with modest results.
Enough to whet the appetite of any oil man.  Finally
well No.7 was drilled to 4,727 feet.  This was the
well that turned the fortunes of the company, and the
world.  It encountered large quantities of oil; and
was completed in March 1938.  Without delay that bleak
site at Dhahran was turned from a camp into a
community.

A six-inch pipeline began carrying oil to the coast at
al-Khobar from where it was taken by barge to the
refinery of the Bahrain Petroleum Company ( BAPCO).
In this modest way the export of Saudi Arabian crude
oil made its beginning.

The marine terminal site was chosen at Ras Tanura - a
narrow spit of land running along the eastern shore of
the Gulf.  This site required causeway construction
far out into the gulf because the coastal water is
very shallow.  By the spring of  1939 a ten inch
pipeline ran between Damman field and Ras Tanura and
thence to an anchorage 3,000 feet off-shore.

The arrival of the first tanker was the occasion of
the first visit to these installation by King Ibn
Saud.  Two thousand persons accompanied the king on
this 870 mile trip in some 400 automobiles.  A camp of
350 tents was established near Dhahran and the
celebration lasted several days.  The king turned the
valve to begin the first tanker to bear a cargo of
Saudi Arabian crude oil.  The date was May 1st. 1939,
precisely four months before the outbreak of WWII.

With the outbreak of the war, operations at Dhahran
gradually came to a halt.  Enemy action made European
markets inaccessible and on October 19th 1940, bombers
of the Italian Air Force flying from Ethiopia hit
Dhahran doing slight damage.  The wives and children
of the oil company personnel departed during May 1941.

The remaining employees continued production of 12,000
to 15,000 barrels per day and shipped that oil to
Bahrain.  A new well at Abqaiq, discovered in November
1941, remained shut-down, and the original 3,000
barrel per day "tea kettle" refinery at Ras Tanura was
shut down before the end of 1941.

Despite the attack on Pearl Harbour and the all-out
involvement of the United States in WW II in Europe,
the Africa-Middle East theater, Asia and the Pacific
Ocean, Washington kept a keen eye on these petroleum
developments in far away "neutral" Saudia Arabia.  By
the autumn of 1943, the United States government had
become concerned about the enormous drain upon
American oil fields due to the requirements of this
massive war.  Dhahran and its vast oil potential was
needed and could not be overlooked.

Early in November 1943, President Roosevelt directed
that an American "Geological Survey Team" headed by
General Cyrus R. "C. R." Smith, founder and president
of American Airlines, be sent to Africa and thence on
to Dhahran not only to investigate the oil fields and
their immediate potential; but to bolster the moral of
that small stand-by group of oil-men who were riding
out the war by holding that franchise at Ras Tanura.

This author was directed to fly General Smith's party,
in a special V.I.P. Lockheed Lodestar of the Air
Transport Command, from Casablanca, on Nov. 10, 1943
and flew to Teheran via Tunis and Cairo.  We arrived
on the island of Bahrain on Nov. 16, 1943.

Because of Saudi Arabia's "neutrality", Gen. Smith had
made special, secret arrangements for our flight from
Bahrain to Dhahran.  We arrived at 11:05 AM on the
17th and were met by Floyd Ohliger, an oil engineer
and three other CASOC people.

General Smith was impressed with the neutral, flat
landing ground near Dhahran and made an offer to
Ohliger to have it moved to Chicago for use by
American Airlines.  Ohliger countered by challenging
Smith to move a refinery to Ras Tanura, in return.  We
visited many places where big pipes stuck out of the
ground about one foot.  Ohliger would unscrew the cap
and oil would bubble out... no pumping, no end to it.
The Geological Survey party was impressed with what
they saw and what they knew was there under the sands
for future exploitation.

Because of the shortage of food on Ras Tanura, we went
out in a work-boat and caught fish for lunch.  By 4:15
PM we were back in the air on the way to Bahrain,
Sharjah and Karachi.

I have always thought about that visit to Dhahran in
1943... how tragic it was that while we were engaged
in the greatest war in history, a war that ran on oil,
these men of CASOC had to delay their plans for the
building of an essential pipeline from Dhahran to the
Mediterranean Sea, before the end of the war, because
of the threat of Jewish hostility.

We did know at the time, because of extreme secrecy,
that the President and a large staff were already
traveling to Cairo for a conference with Churchill and
Chiang Kai Shek later that month.  Upon arrival, the
President was given a briefing on the subject of
General Smith's Arabian visit.  During that crucial
wartime conference, the President authorized the
allocation of vital materials required for the
construction of a 50,000 barrel per day refinery at
Ras Tanura.  This was a direct result of the visit
with CASCO and approval of General Smith's proposal
that a refinery be built on that strategic site.

The wartime lull at Ras Tanura was over.  The project
included the refinery, storage tanks, a T-shaped pier
with tanker berths and a submarine pipeline to the
BAPCO refinery on Bahrain.  The pandemonium of a
large construction project far from a base of supply
was intensified by wartime shortages and government
control of all materials and transport.  Despite all
this, the refinery was placed in partial operation as
early as September 1945 - the very same month that saw
the surrender of the Japanese and the end of World War
II.

The enormous importance of the wartime build-up of the
CASOC facilities at Ras Tanura, of General Smith's
visit to Saudi Arabia in Nov. 1943, of the President's
decision made at Cairo to construct a refinery there,
and of his visit with the Saudi King in Feb. 1945...
only two months before the President died... has been
generally over-looked by historians.  It has not been
given the place in history that it deserves.  It was
the only time during WW II that President Roosevelt
met with the leader of any neutral nation, and he did
that for one product... oil.  This underscores the
extreme importance he placed upon the American
development of the Arabian oil fields, both in time of
war and for the expansion of American post-war
interests.

The vast majority of Middle East oil is sold in
Europe.  The oil production of the Middle East is, and
has been, almost irrelevant to the United States,
other than the collateral fact that its price
influences the "world" price.  Thus the efficient
operation of the great network of pipelines from the
oil-fields of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iran is
essential to the economy of Europe.  Also, the "world"
price of oil generally rises and falls with the tide
flowing from the Middle East.  This was borne out
when, in June of 1947, the ARAMCO partners agreed to
put up the price of oil from $1.02 to $1.43 per
barrel.  Effectively, this became a "world" price.  By
1948, this had reached $2.20 per barrel.

The closure of the Hafia terminal of the IPC pipeline
from Kirkuk in 1948 was followed by the sabotage of
the other branch of that major pipeline system by
Syria in 1957.  This cut off more than 500,000 barrels
of oil per day from Iraq.  Shortly before that, in
1956, the Suez Crisis had cut off 1,500,000 barrels a
day bound for Europe via the Suez Canal.

As a result of theses overt events the price of crude
oil increased again in 1957.  By the end of 1957 oil
shipments through the Canal were back to normal and
the pipeline from Iraq through Syria had been put back
in full operation.  This caused a glut on the market
that caused the price to settle back to 1.80 per
barrel in 1960.  By 1971 the price had risen to $2.40,
and rose to $3.01 before the landmark Arab-Israeli war
of 1973.

Despite these visible posted prices, by the late 60's,
the actual cost of producing a barrel of oil and
pouring it into the hold of a tanker at Ras Tanura,
including all depreciation and capital investment, was
15 cents.  This great difference between the "cost "
and the "price" of oil is a most important point to be
made as we observe the oil business approaching the
period of the "Energy Crisis" as a result of the "Arab
Oil Embargo".  By 1973 this total cost for ARMACO had
reached 34 cents per barrel, whereas Iranian oil cost
19.2 cents per barrel.

At this crucial point in the world-wide rise of oil
prices, a new factor reared its head.  Syria closed
TAPLINE, the largest pipeline system in the Middle
East, in May 1970.  Tanker roles were greatly
influenced by this act as prices for Saudi Arabian and
Kuwaiti oil rose from $2.30 to $3.33 per barrel.

At about the same time the ARAMCO Group informed
President Nixon and his advisor, Henry Kissinger,
that,  "Any increase in American military aid to
Israel will have a critical and adverse effect on our
relationship with the moderate Arabian oil producing
countries."  The record of the Jewish "threat" before
the end of WW II, and of the acts of the state of
Israel in closing the Iraqi pipeline and causing the
strategic realignment of TAPLINE could no be
overlooked.

At about the same time, Jan. 1971, Jack Irwin, a
lawyer formerly with the large New York law firm of
Sullivan & Cromwell and then with the Department of
State, was sent to the Middle East.  He stated, "My
mission was to stress to the leaders of those
countries the concern the United States would feel if
the flow of oil products was to be cut or halted."
Something was in the air.  Or he may have planted a
potent idea for other purposes.

Many have believed that there has been some sort of
conspiracy among the oil companies, over and above the
public manipulations of OPEC, that has caused the
price of oil to rise so drastically without evident
reason.  Others have suspected a role for Henry
Kissinger, oilman Rockerfeller's boy, in his attempt
to sell United States made arms and ammunition to the
rich oil nations, and to drum up business for his
"client" bank Chase Manhattan.

What most people overlook is that the price of oil is
never a result of the function of cost to produce and
is rarely, if ever, influenced directly by either
"supply" or "demand".  In fact, oil prices are set via
the OPEC scenario and by other intricate maneuvers
such as pipeline closings by Israel.  Oil men, since
the time of the willy John D. Rockefeller, have always
wanted us to believe that petroleum has a special
intrinsic value that is not related to it's market
value.  They also would like to have us believe that
it is of organic/biological origin (which it most
certainly is not), and therefore that it is being
depleted at a rapid pace.

The real sleeper in all of these controls is that the
world price of oil can be arranged at any level as a
result of the availability or non availability of
transport.  A barrel of oil on the pier at Ras Tanura
is not worth much, intrinsically or otherwise; but its
value increases... to $20.00 we'll say in 1989... when
transported to Rotterdam, or other key destinations.

Transportation makes the economy:  not the other way
around.  And transportation barons can create prices
at the gas pump that have little to do with the cost
of the product at the well-head.

This is as true in the oil business as it is in any
other, and perhaps even more so.  Because it is so
true, the oil producers like to have more than one
economically reasonable method of transport avaliable
to them for the purpose of keeping transport prices
under control by competitive means.

The modern oil barons learned this game from John D.
Rockerfeller and his Standard Oil Company when they
fought the railroads over freight rates in the later
decades of the nineteenth Century.

The price of an essential commodity, such as oil, is
cut from cloth of many colors.  The old Middle East
expert, Christopher Rand, who has worked for Standard
Oil of California and for Occidental Petroleum, has
written, in the Washington Post, 1974, at the peak of
the "Energy Crisis":
"... that while the "posted price" on which their
(Opec producers) revenues from the companies are
calculated have risen from $1.80 to $3.01 a barrel in
Saudi Arabia and from $2.23 to $4.60 a barrel in
Libya, the cost of producing this oil had gone up not
a whit in either case and remained at 4.6 cents ( per
42 gallon barrel ) from the former and 15 cents ( per
barrel ) from the latter ".

At this same time the average "posted price" for Saudi
Arabian crude was $11.45.  In fact, many oilmen were
saying, "Gasoline is selling for $3.00/gallon in
Europe.  That is $126.00 per barrel.  What's wrong
with $40.00 oil."  It is a necessity.  They knew that
they could get away with it.  Most people have to have
oil.

Little can be learned from an analysis of such a
figure i.e. $11.45.  No one knows how much of that
$11.45 went to the actual producer, to the oil
company, to the transport owners, to the refiners,
brokers, and all others along the line.

It is known... from experience with the American
Railroad systems, that the carrier is able to treat
the product on board as captive for which the ransom,
i.e. rate, can be placed at whatever the market will
bear.  In other words, never count out the control of
the transport factor in the movement of oil or any
other essential commodity as a key ingredient of
price.

As we have said above, when the Suez Crisis of 1956
closed that canal to tanker traffic the price of oil
rose precipitously, and did not fall back afterwards.
Again, in 1970, when Syria closed the TAPLINE system
prices rose from $2.30 to $3.33 per barrel, nearly
fifty percent, as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait were forced
to do business with the tanker consortium.  This is
particularly true when its movement is limited solely
to super-tanker fleets with no alternative
competition.  For the tanker impressarios to control
the cost of the movement of oil they have to be sure
that the pipelines are going to be closed and remain
closed.

This is always feasible with such willing helpers as
Israel and Syria; and is within their control.  We
have seen plenty of evidence of this since 1948 when
Israel closed Haifa.



__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Reply via email to