American Patriot Friends Network <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:37 AM
Subject: "U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS"
> Two major infrastructure projects  are seeking to meet the need for
additional
> export capacity. One, under the aegis of the Caspian
> Pipeline  Consortium,  plans  to  build  a  pipeline west  from  the
northern
> Caspian to  the Russian Black Sea  port of Novorossiysk. Oil  would then
go by
> tanker through the Bosporus to the Mediterranean and world markets.

http://www.cpc-ltd.com/
Click on public information in frames.  Then click on Project Description,
then CPC Ownership Structure.
(Attachment CPC Owners.pdf)
Click on Pipeline Route. (Attachment CPC route.pdf)  The political map can
be viewed under Public Information--Pipeline Route.  This shows the pipeline
to be built will connect two ports across Russia, one on the Caspian Sea and
one on the Black Sea. Afghanistan does not appear on this map.
Access is denied on all topics other than public information.

> The   other   project   is   sponsored   by   the   Azerbaijan
International
> Operating Company,  a consortium  of 11 foreign oil  companies, including
four
> American  companies,  Unocal,  Amoco,  Exxon  and  Pennzoil.  This
consortium
> conceives of  two possible  routes, one line  would angle north  and cross
the
> north  Caucasus  to Novorossiysk.  The other  route would  cross Georgia
to a
> shipping terminal  on the Black Sea. This second  route could be extended
west
> and south across Turkey to the Mediterranean port of Ceyhan.

http://www.azer.com/aiweb/categories/magazine/62_folder/62_articles/62_socar
_aioc.html
[This shows ownership pie map.  BP owns 34%, Unocal 10.3%, Lukoil 10%, Exxon
8%, Pennzoil 5.6%, Socar 10%, Statoil 8.6%, with other companies at less
than 7%.]

http://www.azer.com/aiweb/categories/topics/Oil/oilcontracts_map.html
[Shows a map of each consortium member's drilling contracts in Azerbaijan
and offshore in the Caspian Sea.]
The main part of the Early Oil Project has been concluded which included the
refurbishment of the Chirag-1 platform, the construction of a new onshore
terminal at Sangachal and a 230 km subsea pipeline system, and the
rehabilitation of two existing export pipelines to transport Early Oil to
the Black Sea north through Russia to Novorossiysk and west through Georgia
to Supsa. The Russian route has been operational since last year and the
first tanker lifted 80,000 tons of AIOC-produced oil on March 24, 1998. AIOC
plans to lift 2-3 tankers per month for the remaining months of 1998 to
total 1.5 million tons this year. Meanwhile, the second Early Oil Export
Pipeline (via Georgia) is still under refurbishment, and work continues on
selecting the ultimate Main Export Pipeline.

>... Newly  Independent States of the  former Soviet Union
> are all slow growth markets where demand will grow at only a half a
percent to
> perhaps 1 .2 percent per year during the period 1995 to 2010.
>
> Asia  is a  different story all  together. It  will have a  rapidly
increasing
> energy consumption  need. Prior to the recent  turbulence in the Asian
Pacific
> economies, we  at Unocal anticipated  that this region's demand  for oil
would
> almost do uble by 2010. Although the short-term
> increase in demand will  probably not meet these expectations, we stand
behind
> our long-term estimates....If Asia's energy needs are
> not satisfied,  they will  simply put pressure  on all world  markets,
driving
> prices upwards everywhere.....
[There are two options.]
> The second option is to build a pipeline south from Central Asia to the
Indian
> Ocean. One  obvious route south would  cross Iran, but this  is foreclosed
for
> American companies because of U.S. sanctions legislation. The only other
possi-
> ble  route  is  across  Afghanistan ,  which  has  of course  its  own
unique
> challenges. The  country has  been involved in  bitter warfare for  almost
two
> decades, and is  still divided by civil war. From the  outset, we have
made it
> clear that construction of the pipeline we have proposed across
Afghanistan
> could  not  begin until  a  recognized government  is  in place  that has
the
> confidence of governments, lenders, and our company....

> Unocal foresees  a pipeline which would become part  of a regional system
that
> will  gather  oil  from  existing  pipeline  infrastructure  in
Turkmenistan,
> Uzbekistan,  Kazakhstan and  Russia.  The 1,040-mile  long oil  pipeline
would
> extend  south  through  Afghanistan to  an  export  terminal  that would
be
> constructed on the Pakistan  coast. This 42-inch diameter pipeline will
have a
> shipping capacity of one million barrels of oil per day. The estimated
cost of
> the project, which is  similar in scope to the trans-Alaska pipeline, is
about
> $2.5 billion.
...
Unocal   and   the    Turkish   company   Koc
>
> Holding  are interested in  bringing competitive  gas supplies to  Turkey.
The
> proposed Eurasia  natural gas  pipeline would transport  gas from
Turkmenistan
> directly across  the Caspian Sea through Azerbaijan  and Georgia to
Turkey. Of
> course t he demarcation of the Caspian remains an issue.
>
> Last  October, the Central  Asia Gas  Pipeline Consortium, called
CentGas, in
> which Unocal holds an interest, was formed to develop
> a gas  pipeline which will link Turkmenistan's  vast Dauletabad gas field
with
> markets in  Pakistan and  possibly India. The proposed  790-mile pipeline
will
> open  up  new  markets  for  this  gas, traveling  from  Turkmenistan
through
> Afghanistan to Multan in Pakistan. The proposed  extension would move gas
on
> to New  Delhi, where it would  connect with an existing  pipeline. As with
the
> proposed Central  Asia oil pipeline, CentGas  can not begin construction
until
> an internationally recognized Afghanistan Government is in place.

http://www.atimes.com/global-econ/CJ06Dj01.html
Asia Times Online October 6, 2001
The oil behind Bush and Son's campaigns
By Ranjit Devraj in New Delhi

***
"US influence and military presence in Afghanistan and the Central Asian
states, not unlike that over the oil-rich Gulf states, would be a major
strategic gain," said V R Raghavan, a strategic analyst and former general
in the Indian army. Raghavan believes that the prospect of a western
military presence in a region extending from Turkey to Tajikistan could not
have escaped strategists who are now readying a military campaign aimed at
changing the political order in Afghanistan, accused by the United States of
harboring Osama bin Laden.

Where the "great game" in Afghanistan was once about czars and commissars
seeking access to the warm water ports of the Persian Gulf, today it is
about laying oil and gas pipelines to the untapped petroleum reserves of
Central Asia. According to testimony before the US House of Representatives
in March 1999 by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation,
Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan together have 15 billion
barrels of proven oil reserves. The same countries also have proven gas
deposits totaling not less than nine trillion cubic meters. Another study by
the Institute for Afghan Studies placed the total worth of oil and gas
reserves in the Central Asian republics at around US$3 trillion at last
year's prices.

Not only can Afghanistan play a role in hosting pipelines connecting Central
Asia to international markets, but the country itself has significant oil
and gas deposits. During the Soviets' decade-long occupation of Afghanistan,
Moscow estimated Afghanistan's proven and probable natural gas reserves at
around five trillion cubic feet and production reached 275 million cubic
feet per day in the mid-1970s. But sabotage by anti-Soviet mujahideen
(freedom fighters) and by rival groups in the civil war that followed Soviet
withdrawal in 1989 virtually closed down gas production and ended deals for
the supply of gas to several European countries. ...

In 1998, the California-based UNOCAL, which held 46.5 percent stakes in
Central Asia Gas (CentGas), a consortium that planned an ambitious gas
pipeline across Afghanistan, withdrew in frustration after several fruitless
years. The pipeline was to stretch 1,271km from Turkmenistan's Dauletabad
fields to Multan in Pakistan at an estimated cost of $1.9 billion. An
additional $600 million would have brought the pipeline to energy-hungry
India. ... Other partners in CentGas included the Saudi Arabian Delta Oil
Company, the Government of Turkmenistan, Indonesia Petroleum (INPEX), the
Japanese ITOCHU, Korean Hyundai and Pakistan's Crescent Group. ...But the
immediate reason for UNOCAL's withdrawal was undoubtedly the US cruise
missile attacks on Osama bin Laden's terrorism training camps in Afghanistan
in August 1998, done in retaliation for the bombing of its embassies in
Africa.

http://www.koc.com.tr/english/kurumsal/kurulmasivegelismesi.asp
Koç Group : Foundation and Development
 Vehbi Koç (1901-1996) started his business career when he was only 16 by
convincing his father to open a small grocery store in Ankara in 1917....The
small shop where Vehbi Koç started his business career was registered in his
father's name, but on 31 May 1926 he incorporated the business in his own
name as "Koçzade Ahmet Vehbi" (Ahmet Vehbi of the Koç Family) in the Ankara
Chamber of Commerce and became the owner of this enterprise.

The First Corporation
 << Back | Next >>


Institutionalization efforts constitute one of the most important stages in
the development of the Koç Group. In 1938, realizing that personal companies
did not survive for long, Vehbi Koç organized his business enterprises as a
corporation and founded Koç Ticaret Anonim Þirketi (Koç Trade Inc.). This
corporation in time became the root and center of developments that
generated the enterprises making up the Koç Group. An important and
pioneering practice in this Corporation was employee and manager
participation in overall management which was later adopted as a principle
by the Group. ...Vehbi Koç established the first light bulb factory in
cooperation with General Electric in 1948. ...The joint venture is the form
of cooperation that extends the span of technology and know-how transfer
foreseen in licensing agreements. The Group developed a network of such
ventures while trying to make up for the technological shortcomings with
more licensing agreements. ...In the 1960s, the innovation and
diversification of product groups substantially expanded the product range
of Koç Group companies. The Group was involved in a broad range of
activities varying from agricultural equipment to textiles, various office
supplies to heating equipment, radio and TV sets to household goods such as
refrigerators, washing machines and vacuum cleaners, from furnaces, ovens,
fiber glass, boilers, radiators and liquid petroleum gas to two, three and
four wheel vehicle production and its side industries, from food processing
to chain stores, from tourism to finance and insurance services. As the
economic development of Turkey gained pace after the creation of Turkey's
first domestic car brand, Anadol, Koç Group produced Murat, Tempra, Ford
Taunus and Ford Escort.

http://www.koc.com.tr/english/kurumsal/yabanci_ortak.asp
[foreign partners]

http://www.koc.com.tr/english/kurumsal/uluslararasi.asp
[International offices includes]
U.S.A. Ramerica  One Rockefeller Plaza Suite 2404
New York N.Y.
10020 USA

 http://www.unocal.com/uclnews/97news/111097.htm
Unocal, Koc Holdings to form natural gas
marketing services venture in Turkey
Sugar Land, Texas, Nov. 10, 1997
***
“Our association with Koc Holdings in this new venture promises to help move
Turkey’s energy market into a new and exciting arena,” said John F. Imle,
Jr., president of Unocal Corporation. “Koc is the premier conglomerate group
in Turkey and is highly respected in the manufacturing, international
finance and energy communities. We look forward to working together to
provide Turkey with regional energy solutions.”
One of the alliance’s key objectives is to provide energy independence for
end-users in Turkey and to help relieve some of the region’s current and
future power shortages. To this end, Unocal and Koc have been working
closely on possible development of power projects under Turkey’s ongoing
power-sector privatization program.
“Our main goal is to secure reliable, long-term and cost-effective natural
gas supply, enabling our country’s businesses to compete with other European
Union businesses, which currently have access to competitive sources of
natural gas,” said Rahmi Koc, chairman of Koc Holdings, A.S. “We teamed up
with Unocal because of its regional resources activities, and its expertise
in pipeline construction, energy marketing and resource development. We
believe this will be a very successful alliance.”
...Unocal Corporation is one of the world's leading energy resource and
project development companies, with reserves of more than 9.8 trillion cubic
feet of natural gas equivalent (1.6 billion barrels of oil equivalent) and
major oil and gas production activities in Asia and the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
The company is also active in energy resource development activities in
Azerbaijan and Bangladesh and is developing gas-marketing solutions for
Turkmenistan. The company maintains twin headquarters in California and
Malaysia, with major offices in Singapore, Jakarta, Bangkok and Sugar Land,
Texas.

http://www.singapore-window.org/804caq9.htm
Burma-Singapore Axis: Globalising the Heroin Trade
BY Leslie Kean and Dennis Bernstein
This article is from CAQ Magazine (CovertAction Quarterly) Number 64,
Spring, 1998. ), 1500 Massachusetts Avenue #732, Washington, DC 20005,
phone: (202) 331-9763, E-mail, Website: http://www.caq.com.

...Singapore has acieved the distinction of being the Burmese junta’s number
one business partner - both largest trading partner and largest foreign
investor. More than half these investments, totaling upwards of $1.3
billion, are in partnership with Burma’s infamous heroin kingpin Lo Hsing
Han who now controls a substantial portion of the world’s opium trade.
...Burma now supplies the US with 60 percent of its heroin imports and has
recently become a major regional producer of methamphetamines. With 50
percent of the economy unaccounted for, drug traffickers, businessmen and
government officials are able to integrate spectacular profits throughout
Burma’s permanent economy.

***
Shielding Burma

WHILE Singapore and China are Burma's closest allies, other countries and
mult-national corporations provide a big shield for Burma's narcotics trade.
In 1997 alone, the military regime approved 60 new projects worth $1.27
billion, bringing total foreign investment since the regime came to power to
299 projects worth $6.87 billion. Following Singapore in the foreign
investment lineup are Britain, Thailand and Malaysia, in that order. The US
and France follow close behind.

Unocal - which no longer considers itself a US company but calls itself a
"global energy company" - and the French oil giant Total have joined forces
with the Burmese regime and it's state oil company Myanma Oil and Gas
Enterprises (MOGE) in building the $1.2 billion Yadhana gas pipeline through
Burma into Thailand. Fourteen Burmese plaintiffs filed an unprecedented
federal lawsuit in Los Angeles, holding Unocal and Total accountable for the
torture, rape, murder, forced labor and forced relocations of people living
on the pipeline route.

Unocal also faces allegations of fueling the heroin trade though its
relationship to the government-owned MOGE which is "the main channel for
laundering the revenues of heroin produced and exported under the control of
the Burmese army" according to a sworn affidavit for the federal suit. Randy
Renick, an attorney for the lawsuit, says this affidavit "provides
irrefutable evidence that Unocal is in partnership with criminal drug
dealers who are making profits off the backs of the indigenous people of
Myanmar."

In January, one Israeli and two British companies signed a contract with
MOGE for oil exploration and production, the largest investment in Burma so
far this year. The US oil company Atlantic Richfield (Arco) and oil firms
from Indonesia and Malaysia have also entered into agreements with MOGE.

Back in Washington, the firm of Jefferson Waterman International is busy
campaigning against US sanctions on Burma and giving a face lift to the
Burmese government for $400,000 a year plus expenses. Ironically, Ann B.
Wrobleski, president of the firm, was the architect of Nancy Reagan's "Just
Say No" campaign. As the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau for
International Narcotics Matters from 1986 to 1989, she advocated the denial
of US anti-narcotics aid to the junta in 1989 until a government supported
by the people was in power.

In a 1989 statement to the House of Representatives Task Force on Narcotics
Control, Wrobleski said that "prospects are for expanded cultivation of what
is already the world's largest supply of illicit opium" in Burma. Her State
Department report the same year predicted accurately that Burma's opium
production would continue to increase and that "the military regime is
unlikely to resume any significant anti-narcotics activity for the near
future."

Yet Wrobleski's crusade against drugs seems to have made an about-face since
she moved to Jefferson Waterman International. Her newsletter "Myanmar
Monitor," praises the military regime for making great progress in combating
drugs - information which runs contrary to the current Narcotics Strategy
Control Report from her old department and the statements of Madeleine
Albright and President Clinton. "Western countries are turning a blind eye
to Myanmar's narcotics control efforts" proclaims a January issue, while
other headlines read "SPDC makes headway in Narcotics control" and "Myanmar:
serious about conquering drug trade."

Services provided by Jefferson Waterman also include "strategic counsel" and
"up-to-the-minute intelligence on how Washington views the foreign client,"
according to company information. Both the CEO of Jefferson Waterman
International, Charles E. Waterman, and the Senior Vice-President, Samuel H.
Wyman, were formerly officers for the CIA - Wyman for 31 years.

A second firm, Bain and Associates is receiving $21,500 per month plus
expenses from the Burmese construction company Zay Kabar - which has strong
links to the highest levels of Burma's government - to improve the image of
the regime in the media. With "exclusive permission from the Myanmar
government," Bain sponsored an invitation-only media tour to Burma from
February 24 - 27.

Bain representative Laura Livingston suggested to participants that they
write about the fact that "through mass drug burnings, strong anti-drug
policies and innovative crop-substitution programs, the government is
committed to wiping out the scourge of opium and drugs in present-day
Myanmar." Livingston said that response from journalists to her invitation
was so enthusiastic that Bain doubled the number of participants and had to
turn others away. As a result, more tours are being planned.

http://www.hyperorg.com/backissues/joho-oct11-01.html
Unocal, an American oil company, cooperated with the Taliban in order to
build the Central Asia Gas (CentGas) pipeline between Turkmenistan and
Pakistan. [1] Unocal says they ended this relationship after the US embassy
bombings in August, 1998. [2]
 [1] http://www.unocal.com/uclnews/98news/centgas.htm
[2] http://www.hazara.net/taliban/protectors/oil/oil.html

in March 2000, UNOCAL negotiated with the Taliban to restart the project.
 http://www.brecorder.com/story/S00DD/SDC24/SDC24288.htm

The Elder Bush is part of the UNOCAL crowd. For example, his Secretary of
the Air Force was appointed to the UNOCAL Board in December, 1998.[1] And
his buddy, Nicholas Brady, helped block a hostile take-over of UNOCAL in
1985. [2]
 [1] http://www.unocal.com/uclnews/98news/120798a.htm

[2] http://www.tarpley.net/bush19.htm


What do I have to do for you folks? Hand you a smoking gun







Reply via email to