-Caveat Lector- > > http://www.thule.org/looksaucer.html > > How could there be diffused light on the moon? > > on the moon there is no prism of > atmosphere to diffuse or bend light so the sky is totally black.
Here we have a classic example of someone assuming a desired conclusion and fitting the "facts" to "prove' that conclusion. I can do the same thing; all that is necessary is to change the assumed "lie" from "we went to the moon" to "the moon has no atmosphere." The author, who is not willing to believe what he was told about the moon landing, is nonetheless unable to question the same authority which also told him the moon has no atmosphere. Did they lie about one and not the other? So if I assume then, that I have been lied to about the moon's atmosphere, I can conclude: 1. There is atmosphere on the moon. 2. Therefore light will be diffused and produce soft shadow and color. 3. Therefore the NASA photos are not faked (at least not for that reason). 4. Therefore NASA astronauts landed on the moon and the photos in question are genuine. See how easy it is? Not that I am happy about either lie; but this illustrates the trap of assuming we "know" anything or are even capable of knowing things as absolutes. > > "At what temperature does film melt?" I asked. > > "One hundred and fifty degrees." > > But NASA video and film prove the astronauts to be on the moon's > surface when the sun was at high noon; the temperature was +250 F. > degrees. > > "The film, in the uncooled cameras would melt," Kodak said. Once again the author does not question the accepted surface temperature of the moon but chooses to question other things. The film would indeed not survive that temperature, IF true. So it seems we pick and choose the things we "wish" to believe. This is a trap set for the human mind that works all too well. The only way out of the trap is to question each and every concept we have been conditioned to "believe" is "real." Until we can conceive the possibility of frequency (electromagnetic) manipulation of our minds by earthly or other means, we have no way out of our present reality matrix. And we are so easily deceived as to make doing so child's play, even for lowly humans who have acquired the knowledge and methods. Can you tell the difference between "reality" and a holographic insert? Neither can I. Yet. <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
