--- Begin Message ---
The Power of Propaganda

<http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/000/709vuidh.asp> 


Warriors have been employing psychological warfare at least since Alexander 
the Great. Some have had greater success than others.

by Matt Labash
12/20/2001

"PROPAGANDA, PROPAGANDA, PROPAGANDA," Adolf Hitler once wrote, "all that 
matters is
propaganda." When it came to employing propaganda, the Fuehrer was 
obviously on board.
Dedicating two chapters of "Mein Kampf" to the subject, the patron of the 
art that brought us
Leni Riefenstal and Joe Goebbels became a propaganda champion after 
watching Germany's
trouncing in World War I, which came in no small part because of British 
propaganda efforts
directed against it by the not-so-subtly named "Ministry for the 
Destruction of the German
Confidence."
Because Hitler made Nazism so readily identifiable with propaganda 
(Goebbels, never a light touch, assumed the title "Minister of 
Propaganda"), the very word tends to give American soldiers a severe case 
of the euphemisms. This I learned when visiting the U.S. Army's propaganda 
specialists at Fort Bragg, North Carolina "Psyching Out the Taliban" in the 
current issue of The Weekly Standard). The last century has seen propaganda 
dissemination called everything from "psychological warfare" to 
"information operations" to today's relatively clinical sounding 
"psychological operations" ("And how did your psychological operation go?" 
one colleague asked upon my return).
"I prefer not to use the word propaganda," says Lt. Col. Glenn Ayers, the 
9th PSYOP battalion
commander. "It has negative connotations." So it does, but many argue it 
shouldn't. Dr. Philip Taylor, in his book "Munitions of the Mind," writes 
that "Propaganda itself is neither sinister nor evil. It is really no more 
than the organization of methods designed to persuade people to think and 
behave in a certain way, and in wartime that usually means getting them to 
fight or to support the fight."
Or to stop fighting altogether. Since warfare's beginning, military 
philosophers and strategists have recognized the necessity of 
"psychological operations" (a subset of propaganda, since PSYOP is 
generally directed at the enemy, while propaganda is additionally used on 
one's own). Sun Tzu wrote, "One need not destroy one's enemy. One need only 
destroy his willingness to engage." And Carl von Clausewitz wrote, "Killing 
the enemy's courage is as vital as killing his troops." How forces have gone
about doing so demonstrates the full spectrum of wartime caginess and 
brutality, of ingenuity and comic ineptitude.
As Taylor writes, the word "propaganda" actually comes to us from the 
Vatican, which established the "Congregatio de Propaganda Fide" (The 
Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith) intended to defend 
Catholicism against the heretics of the Protestant Reformation. But even 
before it had a name, it was widely practiced.
Retired PSYOPer Ed Rouse, keeper of psywarrior.com (the web's definitive 
PSYOP history source), says that Alexander the Great was one of history's 
earliest propagandists. After conquering most of the known world, his army 
was stretched thin.
Forced to retreat and regroup with armies he had left behind, he realized 
such an action would advertise that he was vulnerable to attack. His only 
option was to intimidate opposing forces as a deterrent. So Alexander had 
his armorers build oversized breastplates and helmets, ones that looked as 
if they were fitted for eight-foot tall soldiers. As his army retreated, 
they left the big-and-tall armor behind, scaring possible pursuers who 
feared they'd be doing battle with giants. (During the Vietnam War,
American operatives tried to trick the North Vietnamese into thinking they 
were facing giants of another sort, by planting foot-long condoms along the 
Ho Chi Minh Trail.)
Other forces, however, exhibited less cleverness, which is not to say they 
weren't effective. One Assyrian king discouraged revolts in the rebellious 
city of Suru by nailing the flayed skins of revolutionaries to a pillar of 
the city gate. While in the pre-leaflet era, Vlad the Impaler found that 
his most effective calling card came from spearing Turkish invaders on tall 
spikes.
Gutenberg and Marconi certainly didn't end wartime barbarity. But their 
inventions allowed for the dissemination of propaganda through the more 
sophisticated means of printed materials and radio broadcasts. The British 
helped usher in PSYOP's modern era, which sought to persuade the enemy to 
cease fighting, as much as it did to demoralize them while they still were.
The Brits weren't always perfect gentlemen. During World War II, they grew 
especially nasty with their own P.G. Wodehouse, who they were convinced was 
a Nazi collaborator. One BBC broadcaster derided Jeeves's creator, claiming 
"he was throwing a cocktail party when the storm troopers clumped in on his 
shallow life. They led him away, the funny Englishman, with his vast 
repertoire of droll butlers, amusing young men, and comic titled fops. 
Wodehouse was steadily groomed for stardom, the most disreputable stardom 
in the world, the limelight of quislings."
But when it came to the Nazis themselves, the Brits were downright 
thoughtful. As the Allies' blockade began to starve the Germans, they 
air-dropped menus from London restaurants to show what they were missing. 
BBC broadcasts into Germany went so far as to offer gratis English lessons: 
"Please repeat after me. ICH BRENNE. I am burning. DU BRENNST. You are 
burning. WIR BRENNEN. We burn." Rouse writes that the lesson, which the 
Germans were promised would be "very useful,"
helped confirm already prevalent rumors that the British were capable of 
torching the English Channel when Hitler invaded. It was a fabrication so 
expertly spread, many Germans believe it to this day.
Ridicule has long been a favorite propaganda tool. The Nazis, for instance, 
attempted to drive a wedge between the Allies by claiming that "Britain 
will fight to the last Frenchman." Add a sex chaser, and ridicule can be 
devastatingly effective, or blow up in the propagandist's face.
During World War II, Taylor writes in "Munitions of the Mind," the Brits 
would interrogate captured Nazi submarine crews, soliciting the names of 
customers at the brothels in Brest and Kiel. The names would then be 
broadcast within Germany in order to disgrace officers of distinction, a 
charge some took so seriously that they actually committed suicide. The 
Axis powers
weren't quite as successful. According to Dr. Stanley Sandler, the former 
command historian at the U.S. Army's Special Warfare Center and School, 
Americans generally refrained from incorporating sexual themes in their 
propaganda materials. (One exception, says Sandler, came against the Nazis, 
when a PSYOP loudspeaker team "thoughtfully provided the names of local 
girls infected with VD to a dug-in German garrison in Cherbourg.") But the 
Japanese showed no such restraint. When they dropped pornographic leaflets 
on sex-starved American GI's, intending to show how their girls were 
getting defiled back home,
"It raised morale," says Sandler. "Our guys loved it."
Sandler, who wrote the psychological operations history "Cease Resistance," 
says many of the most unintentionally hilarious propaganda pieces tend to 
have sexual themes. During the Korean war, tin-eared Commies blasted 
Americans with loudspeaker broadcasts promising "We have plenty of food, 
victuals, intercourse, and time off to play cards." One of the most 
unpopular coalition leaflets during the Gulf War was drawn up by King 
Fahd's illustrator. "(It) showed two figures walking hand-in-hand into the 
sunset, flanked by Iraqi and Saudi flags," says Sandler. The message was 
"'Arab brotherhood'screw Saddam. But
some U.S. troops called this 'the fag leaflet,' not realizing that men of 
heterosexual persuasion (in this region) walked around holding hands."
Not being attuned to such cultural nuances can prove disastrous, which Iraq 
demonstrated with its abysmal propaganda campaign. Iraqis claimed not only 
that Americans had come to rape their women and spread the AIDS virus, but 
also that "we would kill them and eat them," writes Richard D. Johnson in 
his book "Seeds of Victory." Even more preposterous were the propaganda 
broadcasts of Iraq's Baghdad Betty, who attempted to demoralize our troops 
by warning them that their women back home were being seduced by Bart Simpson.
Asserting that the enemies' wives are being violated by cartoon characters 
is the kind of snafu U.S. PSYOPers are particularly determined to avoid. 
This is why the Army's 4th Psychological Operations Group employs 35 
civilian experts, skilled in a region's language and cultural nuances. Dr. 
Robert Jenks, the Group's Deputy Commanding Officer for Research, Analysis 
and Civilian Affairs, says that just as in regular commercial marketing, 
they have to be extremely wary of committing cross-cultural blunders.
As an example, he mentions chicken king Frank Perdue, whose ad claimed, "It 
takes a tough man to create a tender chicken."
When the same ad was translated into Spanish, Jenks says, it came out, "It 
takes an aroused man to create an affectionate chicken."
Oddly enough, perhaps the only thing more important than not implying that 
your audience fondles farm animals is being truthful.
"You don't have to tell the whole truth, but one of the basic rules of 
PSYOP is tell no lies," explains Sandler, who says it's an absolute 
necessity when trying to establish credibility with a hostile foreign 
audience you want to see surrender. "If we say, 'you're gonna be 
well-treated,' then we use your ear for an ashtray, the word gets out."
Hewing close to the truth is why American PSYOPs has generally been more 
effective than that of our counterparts. Of all the propaganda experts I 
spoke with, not a single one could think of an American defection that had 
been caused by our enemies' propaganda (Jane Fonda excepted). Occasionally, 
of course, we shade the truth a tad. During Vietnam, Rouse writes, covert 
operatives created a false fishing village on an island off South Vietnam, 
where they brought blindfolded, kidnapped North Vietnamese fisherman. After 
wining and dining them, then telling them how the village belonged to a 
bogus resistance group known as "The Sacred Sword of the Patriot League," 
they returned them back to North Vietnam. There, the disinformation spread 
rapidly, causing our enemy to devote resources to crushing a movement that 
didn't exist.
One man's lie, of course, is another's "tactical misdirection." But all 
advertising paints selective pictures, which is why Sandler says, "A lot of 
people in World War II got into PSYOPs from advertising. It's the same 
thing, there's the hard sell, the soft sell, the guy next door, the 
glamour-puss. That's one of the reasons we're so successful. We invented 
bullshiton Madison Avenue."
---------
Matt Labash is senior writer at The Weekly Standard. 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Send FREE Holiday eCards from Yahoo! Greetings.
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/IgTaHA/ZQdDAA/ySSFAA/zgSolB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
ctrl is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds 
are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are sordid matters and 
'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-directions and outright frauds—is 
used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout 
the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, ctrl gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always 
suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. ctrl gives no credence to Holocaust 
denial and nazi's need not apply.

There are two list running, ctrl@yahoogroups and [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
ctrl@yahoogroups has unlimited posting and is more for discussion. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is more for informational exchange and has limited posting 
abilities. 

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Om 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to