-Caveat Lector- This is exactly what I've been thinking. Remember reading yesterday or Friday, however, that the coroner ruled this a suicide. There's no Zapruder film, either. And now there are articles talking about the psychological toll of Enron, and how this "suicide" was a prime example of it.
If there is *anything* pointing to this incident not being a suicide, I'd be very interested in seeing it. For now, just for the reasons stated below, it would seem unlikely that it was suicide. But it may be very difficult to find the loose thread in this one ... and I have been looking. - jt ----- Original Message ----- From: "RevCOAL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Jei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I would have a hard time believing that someone *willing and eager* to > >testify, with loads of money and a rich and nice life ahead of him, > >would suddenly decide to take his own life, much less do it in a place > >such as the front seat of a car. > > Agreed. It doesn't make any sense that he'd suddenly decide that life > wasn't worth living just days before he was due to testify before Congress; > one would think that if he WAS of such a bent, he'd wait until AFTER he'd > testified, that he would feel that he would at least try to 'right wrongs' > and perhaps get back at those who'd wronged him by spilling the beans to > Congress, and then commit suicide (if indeed he WAS suicidal)... > > The timing strongly suggests that 'someone' didn't want to risk having > Baxter testify, and decided to pull a 'Silkwood' on him... > > > >Statistically, suicides don't just > >happen on the front seat of a car, by gunshot. You drive or gas yourself > >to death, but you don't shoot yourself there. You do it someplace else. > > Also agreed. Suicides by gunshot usually do so within their own home; or > they drive themselves to a secluded location, but as you pointed out they > don't shoot themselves in the car, but get out and go a short ways from the > car.... > > > >The people in power wouldn't be in power, if they didn't know the > >elementaries of how to keep and stay in power, and that means eliminating > >the threats. > > And that means not only eliminating threats, but doing so in such a manner > as to strongly communicate to any other potential threats that the same > thing lies in store for them if they also decide to 'spill the beans'... <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
