|
funny how you didn't reprint much of the article.
it is actually pretty cool, or gruesome depending how you look at it. all that
this group were doing is promoting the idea of accepting homosexuals for what
they are and not to be scared of them or to treat them like freaks or as evil.
it is only promoting the idea that they may have a valid choice and are making
it and that sexual orientation does not make you a monster (mostly
anyway).
the one thing it is not doing is promoting
homosexuality or recruiting to "maintain lifestyle". it is distasteful that
campaigning/educating against persecuting *something people do* can be twisted
to mean promoting *something people do*
and you put your children in real danger with this
dull attitude. because groups like NAMBLA focus their campaigns in the reverse,
using the same idea, to claim that they are fighting against the
persecution of *something* to further the promotion of their cause,
when in fact, at the end of the day- all they are is fucking perverts who ought
to be tortured to death (speaking as a liberal, of course) and should not be
able to exploit the law in such a way. but it is the "church's"
misplaced targettting of homosexuals that encourages this to happen. cause,
really, who cares what orientation my son has when he grows up- as long as he is
never in danger from a paedophile.
interesting last line that you sign off on archie.
tell me, which set of which god's laws do you live by? how far do you take it?
how selective are you of which rules to obey? i only ask because there seems to
be reams of them and i was wondering which of them can be left out. which laws
are only for jews and which should christians obey?
|
- [CTRL] Schools sued over pro-homosexual skits [California] Archibald Bard
- c.
