-Caveat Lector-

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,649917,00.html

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

US targets Saddam

Pentagon and CIA making plans for war against Iraq this year

Julian Borger in Washington and Ewen MacAskill
Thursday February 14, 2002
The Guardian

The Pentagon and the CIA have begun preparations for an assault on Iraq
involving up to 200,000 US troops that is likely to be launched later this
year with the aim of removing Saddam Hussein from power, US and diplomatic
sources told the Guardian yesterday.
President George Bush's war cabinet, known as the "principals committee",
agreed at a pivotal meeting in late January that the policy of containment
has failed and that active steps should be taken to topple the Iraqi leader.

But, according to a US intelligence source familiar with CIA preparations,
provisional plans for a parallel overt and covert war only landed on the
president's desk in the past few days.

"I will reserve whatever options I have. I'll keep them close to my vest.
Saddam Hussein needs to understand that I'm serious about defending our
country," Mr Bush said yesterday.

Since the principals committee decision, Colin Powell, the secretary of state
and the dove of the administration, has pointedly added his voice to the
calls for a "regime change".

"We are looking at a variety of options that would bring that about," he told
the Senate budget committee.

The blueprint for a campaign against Iraq has evolved from a contingency plan
drawn up by the joint chiefs of staff that envisaged the use of a
200,000-strong US force, the bulk of which would invade from Kuwait.

The final version is likely to involve a lighter, more mobile force, which
relies more on covert and special forces, in the light of the Afghan
experience. A working document has been forwarded to the White House, but it
is far from definitive. The generals remain deeply uneasy about the threat of
Iraqi chemical and biological retaliation against US troop concentrations or
against Israel in the event of a conflict.

Central command has already set up forward headquarters in the Gulf from
which each of the component services will be able to coordinate the war.

The air force headquarters (Afcent) is at the Prince Sultan air base in Saudi
Arabia. The army headquarters (Arcent) is in Kuwait, while the navy (Navcent)
is in Bahrain. Central command's marine component (Marcent) is also expected
to move to Bahrain in the next few days, weeks after the main marine force
left Afghanistan.

The US, Israel and Turkey were due to hold joint exercises codenamed
Anatolian Eagle this year, but in another sign of accelerated preparations
there will be three such exercises in the next few months, based at the
Turkish air force base at Konya. Once upgraded, Konya could be used alongside
Incirlik as a base for air strikes on northern Iraq.

The Pentagon's military planners are reported to have agonised over the Iraq
plan because of the significant risk that Saddam - aware that unlike during
the Gulf war his own life is at stake this time - would use chemical and
biological weapons against US troop concentrations and Israel. The danger
would be minimised by intensive bombing of missile launchers, but the
generals reportedly remain extremely concerned that the risks cannot be
eliminated entirely.

The CIA's covert war would involve arming and training Kurdish fighters in
northern Iraq and Shi'ite forces in Kuwait. CIA trainers and special forces
troops have already been dispatched to Kuwait for that purpose, and may
already have begun work.

Meanwhile, CIA and special forces will launch a campaign of sabotage and
information warfare in the next few months. The CIA puts very little faith in
the military capacity of the main opposition movement, the Iraqi National
Congress, but it has begun intensive consultations with INC officials about
the logistics of training and arming the movement's supporters.

The trigger could be the expected row over weapons inspections in three
months' time. America's allies are clinging to the hope that US military
action will be forestalled by Baghdad's acceptance of unconditional and
unfettered weapons inspections when the international sanctions regime comes
up for review at the United Nations in May.

However, Iraq's vice-president, Taha Yassin Ramadan, said yesterday there was
no need for "spies" from the UN inspection teams to return to the country.

A US state department official said he thought it very unlikely that the
Iraqi regime would be prepared to accept the stringent programme of
inspections the US will demand.

As the American intelligence source put it, the White House "will not take
yes for an answer", suggesting that Washington would provoke a crisis. He
added that he expected the war to begin soon after the May ultimatum.

US allies in the Middle East have been informed that a decision to attack
Iraq has already been taken, and diplomats from the region said yesterday
they were resigned to the inevitability of a war that may threaten the
stability of a string of Arab regimes.

"It is a nightmare situation for us," said one Arab diplomat in Washington.
"We feel the Americans will take very drastic action and we have to be
prepared for such a reality. But the public opinion in the street will not
see this as a benign attempt to restore order, but as American imperialism."

France, Germany and others in the European Union have been queuing up to make
clear to Mr Bush that they will not support him in military action against
Iraq.

The German foreign minister, Joschka Fischer, this week joined the French
foreign minister, Hubert Védrine, in expressing publicly his concern about US
policy towards Iraq.

But Tony Blair and the foreign secretary, Jack Straw, have refused to join
the public outcry. A Foreign Office official said yesterday that military
action was not imminent, but would be "a question of months".

A Foreign Office spokesman later said: "The prime minister has made it clear
from the outset that the campaign would have two phases: the first focusing
on Afghanistan and the second looking at different aspects of international
terrorism. In that context, we have to look at issues such as weapons of mass
destruction."

There are regular exchanges between the US state department and the Foreign
Office on strategy for tackling Iraq. The Foreign Office spokesman said: "We
will proceed in consultation with our allies and the precise methods of
action will be for consultation in due course."

In the months after September 11, the Foreign Office repeatedly ruled out
military action against Iraq, other than the regular bombing along its border
with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Its line at the time was that there was no
evidence linking Iraq to terrorist activity.

Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Turkey, all US allies neighbouring Iraq, expect to
sustain significant economic and political damage from a new conflict. Jordan
believes it stands to lose $800m (£500m) from the interruption of deliveries
of cheap Iraqi oil.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
Write to same address to be off lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to