-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nj.com/mercer/times/index.ssf?/mercer/times/02-19-IZAR1IUB.html

Expert: Anthrax suspect ID'd

02/19/02

By JOSEPH DEE
Staff Writer

PRINCETON BOROUGH -- An advocate for the control of biological
weapons who has been gathering information about last autumn's
anthrax attacks said yesterday the Federal Bureau of Investigation
has a strong hunch about who mailed the deadly letters.

But the FBI might be "dragging its feet" in pressing charges because
the suspect is a former government scientist familiar with "secret
activities that the government would not like to see disclosed," said
Barbara Hatch Rosenberg, director of the Federation of American
Scientists' Chemical and Biological Weapons Program.

Rosenberg, who spoke to about 65 students, faculty members and others
at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at
Princeton University, said the FBI has known of the suspect since
October and, according to her "government insider" sources, has
interrogated him more than once.

The investigation into five anthrax-laced letters and several other
hoax letters -- all mailed last fall, including several processed by
Trenton Main Post Office in Hamilton -- was the focus of Rosenberg's
talk. She also gave her thoughts about what the government should do
to control biological weapons.

"There are a number of insiders -- government insiders -- who know
people in the anthrax field who have a common suspect," Rosenberg
said. "The FBI has questioned that person more than once, . . . so it
looks as though the FBI is taking that person very seriously."

She said it is quite possible the suspect is a scientist who formerly
worked at the U.S. government's military laboratory at Fort Detrick,
Md.

Rosenberg said she has been gathering information from press reports,
congressional hearings, Bush administration news conferences and
government insiders she would not name.

During a brief question-and-answer session after her talk, one man
wondered whether biological agents truly pose significant dangers to
the public, given the limited number of deaths and illnesses caused
by five anthrax-laced letters.

Without mentioning other biological agents that are far more deadly
and contagious than anthrax, Rosenberg said the potential for a
biological attack is "catastrophic."

Another man wondered if the FBI and other investigators might be
focusing too narrowly on one scientist, saying, "New Jersey is the
epicenter of the international pharmaceutical industry," and many
people in those labs presumably have the skills to handle and refine
anthrax.

"I think your argument would have been a good one earlier on, but I
think that the results of the analyses (of the letters and the
anthrax in them) show that access to classified information was
essential," Rosenberg said. "And that rules out most of the people in
the pharmaceutical industry. . . . It's possible, but they would have
had to have access to the information," Rosenberg said.

Picking up the conversational thread, another man said, "People know
a lot, and it's a question of what they choose to focus their
knowledge on. Things are invented in parallel," he said.

-- -- --

She said the evidence points to a person who has experience handling
anthrax; who has been vaccinated and has received annual booster
shots; and who had access to classified government information about
how to chemically treat the bacterial spores to keep them from
clumping together, which allows them to remain airborne.

"We can draw a likely portrait of the perpetrator as a former Fort
Detrick scientist who is now working for a contractor in the
Washington, D.C., area," Rosenberg said. "He had reason for travel to
Florida, New Jersey and the United Kingdom. . . . There is also the
likelihood the perpetrator made the anthrax himself. He grew it,
probably on a solid medium and weaponized it at a private location
where he had accumulated the equipment and the material.

"We know that the FBI is looking at this person, and it's likely that
he participated in the past in secret activities that the government
would not like to see disclosed," Rosenberg said. "And this raises
the question of whether the FBI may be dragging its feet somewhat and
may not be so anxious to bring to public light the person who did
this.

"I know that there are insiders, working for the government, who know
this person and who are worried that it could happen that some kind
of quiet deal is made that he just disappears from view," Rosenberg
said.

"This, I think, would be a really serious outcome that would send a
message to other potential terrorists, that (they) would think they
could get away with it.

"So I hope that doesn't happen, and that is my motivation to continue
to follow this and to try to encourage press coverage and pressure on
the FBI to follow up and publicly prosecute the perpetrator."

-- -- --

She expressed disappointment that the U.S. government last July
decided against signing an international biological weapons treaty
that would ban nations from developing such weapons.

"It became clear from congressional testimony that the reason for
this rejection was the need to protect our secret projects,"
Rosenberg said.

During the question-and-answer period, one woman said, "I'm not sure
that I understood you completely, but it seems to me that the United
States government has a double-standard," of wanting other nations to
comply with a weapons ban but wanting freedom to pursue its own
program.

"I'm totally shocked by this information," she said, sending a wave
of laughter through the lecture hall.

"They make no bones about it," Rosenberg replied. "On many occasions
they've argued that rules should be for the bad guys, not the good
guys."

Rosenberg said she worries about an "enormous increase" in money in
the Bush budget for research into bioterrorism agents. "There is
already a rush for this funding," she said.

The number of researchers and labs ought to be tightly controlled,
she said. Under the current budget proposal, however, she says the
government will be spreading money around to "a lot more people and a
lot more laboratories around the country from which bioterrorists can
emerge, as one just did.

"By spreading around this access and this knowledge, we're asking for
trouble.'

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to