-Caveat Lector-
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : Germany
German press turns anti-American
Editorial of Gleichheit, published by the Socialist Equality Party of Germany
By Peter Schwarz
13 March 2002
Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author
The March/April edition of the German magazine Gleichheit, reproducing important
articles from the World Socialist Web Site, is soon to be published. The new edition
will take as its theme “Europe and America”. It contains several contributions
analysing the significance of the war in Afghanistan, as well as a detailed article by
Peter Schwarz concerning the growing tensions between Europe and America. The
following is the editorial of the forthcoming edition.
Over the last few weeks a significant change of opinion can be discerned within
influential circles in Germany. The traditional feeling of attachment to the US,
characterised by a general harmoniousness since the end of the Second World War,
has soured into a sceptical and even hostile attitude. In particular, publications
normally regarded as belonging to the liberal or social-democratic spectrum
—Frankfurter Rundschau, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Der Spiegel, Die Zeit —have taken
on an increasingly anti-American tone which is also finding an echo in government
circles.
When Chancellor Gerhard Schröder pledged the Bush government “unqualified
solidarity” in the war against terrorism after September 11, his statement was
received with hardly any criticism. But since then it has become clear that the US
government is not prepared to coordinate its political and military moves with its
allies. Commenting on the general state of disillusionment, the magazine Der Spiegel
asserts: “The calculation by Europeans that the zealously promised ‘unqualified
solidarity’ would strengthen its ability to influence its ‘big brother’ has proven to
be an
illusion.” And Die Zeit suggests: “The Europeans have deceived themselves. George
W. Bush has not changed from Saul to Paul. The Afghan campaign rapidly
developed into the triumphal display of unilateralism.” According to Der Spiegel, what
is predominating in governmental circles recently is “the view that pure power politics
rather than the fight against terrorism” lies behind American moves in the Middle
East.
In the latest edition of Die Zeit, Theo Sommer states that Europe should react to
America’s “arrogance of power” with “self-confidence, calm and determination”. He
believes that the European Union should “resist America’s unreasonable demand to
reduce world politics to the military component” and instead “strive for patient
diplomacy, multilateral solutions and the strengthening of the United Nations”—in
other words, it must forge its own alliance against the US. Sommer stresses that in
no way should Europeans allow themselves to become “America’s global deputy
sheriff”.
Germany’s federal government is also heading for confrontation with the US. During
a cabinet meeting, Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer, until recently firmly committed
to the transatlantic partnership, gave warning of a day “when Europeans will have to
make it clear that the Americans are no longer pursuing our kind of politics”.
Behind this swing in opinion lies the realisation that the geopolitical interests of
Europe and America cannot be reconciled permanently. The further the US extends
its military operations in Central Asia and the Middle East, the weaker appears the
official justification that it is fighting a war against terrorism. The stationing of
American troops in an increasing number of former states of the Soviet Union,
together with threats of war against Iraq and Iran, reveal that the US government is
striving to dominate strategically important regions and sources of raw materials,
which are also vital to the European economy. In its latest issue, Spiegel magazine
quoted an unnamed European foreign minister, saying he certainly did not want “to
insinuate that [the US government] was planning a permanent occupation of oilfields
in the whole region—but in order to protect themselves, there will eventually be no
other course open to the Americans and this will have unforeseeable consequences
for the Middle East region and world peace as a whole.”
While American and European troops in Afghanistan fight side by side,
contradictions and tensions between the respective ministries and state departments
are sharpening. Under these circumstances, criticism of aggressive American
foreign policy also serves to mobilise support for the equally aggressive aims of
German and European foreign policy. In order to pursue this objective, a deliberately
anti-American tone is being assumed.
Disapproval of American policy is also being voiced by right-wing politicians like
Friedrich Merz, chairman of the CDU (conservative Christian Democratic Union)
parliamentary faction, who normally regards any criticism of US governmental policy
as sacrilegious. But criticism of the reactionary policy of the Bush administration
is, in
itself, no more an expression of anti- Americanism than criticism of the policies of
Chancellor Schröder is an expression of anti- German sentiment. Anti-Americanism
begins when the American people as a whole are held responsible for Bush’s
policies, when any opposition between the ultra-right forces buttressing the Bush
administration and the majority of the population is denied.
It is this latter interpretation which runs through numerous lead articles and
commentaries in the German press. Wolfgang Koydl in the Süddeutsche Zeitung
declares: “In Europe and elsewhere people like to hold George Bush personally
responsible for America’s hoodlumism. Sometimes he’s seen as a cowboy,
sometimes as a Rambo.... But Bush isn’t the exception.... It may be that he received
no—or only a narrow—majority in the presidential elections; nevertheless he
currently defends the moral values of a religious, prudish, hard- working America
better than the saxophone-playing philanderer, Bill Clinton.” Der Spiegel’s editor,
Rudopf Augstein, absurdly claims that “It is the American mentality that we will never
be able to change to the end of mankind.” And Die Zeit allotted Jedediah Purdy, a
young American graduate, a whole page of the newspaper to vent his feelings on the
issue, where he writes: “Bush stands for the tradition of the good hearted in
American politics”. This, according to Purdy, is the “predominating political culture”
which expresses a specific American tendency “to yield up the legal protection of
liberties”.
These claims are a mixture of presumptuous ignorance and intentional muddling.
They ignore the enormous social contradictions tearing American society apart, just
as they disregard the fact that Bush failed to achieve a majority in the election and
only became president thanks to the ruling of a predominantly right-wing Supreme
Court.
Last year the WSWS published an article entitled “Anti-Americanism: The ‘anti-
imperialism’ of fools”, in which was written: “To present ‘the US’ as some predatory
imperialist monolith ... can only confuse and disorient. It not only serves as a
barrier
to genuine internationalism, it overlooks the contradictory character of American
history and society.... The United States is a complex entity, with a complex history,
elements of which are distinctly ignoble, elements of which are deeply noble.”
In the light of German history, the conception of an unalterable American mentality,
tending towards hooliganism and the surrendering of freedom, seems patently
absurd. In contrast to Germany, where a victorious democratic revolution has never
occurred, the US has witnessed two revolutions—the American Revolution (war of
independence) and the Civil War. These traditions have profoundly influenced social
consciousness and found expression in the civil rights movement of the 1960s and
elsewhere. The few genuinely democratic elements to be found in today’s German
constitution are primarily a consequence of the allied victory in the Second World
War. The German government will not hesitate to jettison them again when
conditions demand—as Interior Minister Otto Schily’s two bundles of tightened
security measures clearly show.
The notion that Bush embodies the average American is an absolute lie. Even if one
disregards that he blatantly stole the presidential election and received nationwide
about 600,000 votes fewer than his Democratic opponent, Al Gore, the fact remains
that only a quarter of the American electorate voted for him. About half withheld their
vote owing to the absence of a visible alternative to the two mainstream candidates.
The gulf dividing Bush and his right-wing coterie from the mass of the population has
grown wider since the election. Bush has determinedly continued the policies of his
predecessors who systematically diverted distribution of national income from the
poor to the rich. The present war in Afghanistan is not only serving the aims of
foreign policy, it is also Bush’s only answer to problems on the home front. Without
the continual stirring up of chauvinism accompanying the war, the social
contradictions rending American society would have erupted long ago.
Poll results, which accord Bush considerable popularity, are extremely deceptive.
Above all, they reflect the fact that no serious political opposition exists, since the
Democrats and a compliant media have aligned themselves so completely with Bush
and the real mood of the population is unable to find a conscious outlet. But such a
situation can soon change, as recently happened in the case of Bush’s Italian
counterpart, Silvio Berlusconi.
The anti-Americanism being fanned by the German press serves to drive a wedge
between the European and American peoples and to whip up support for the
imperialist foreign policy of the German government. As in America, the growth of
militarism in Germany constitutes an attack on the German population, which will
have to bear the costs in the form of welfare cuts and the dismantling of democratic
rights. A struggle against this is only possible on the basis of an international,
socialist programme uniting the workers of Europe and America.
Copyright 1998-2002
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
