-Caveat Lector-
>From http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=279881
}}}>Begin
30 March 2002 08:30 GMT
Home > Argument > Commentators
Robert Fisk: The lies leaders tell when they want to go to war
'The problem with Arafat is that he has a lot in common with Sharon: old, ruthless
and cynical'
30 March 2002 Internal links Israel's assault on Arafat Schoolgirl suicide bomber kills
two in supermarket Violence deters Christian pilgrims Besieged Arafat 'is prepared
to become a martyr' Arab fury at 'foolish, illegal aggression' Leading article:
Sadly,
four years of peace in Ireland offers little hope for the Middle East
How much longer can Ariel Sharon pretend that he's fighting in the "war against
terror"? How much longer are we supposed to believe this nonsense? How much
longer can the Americans remain so gutlessly silent in the face of a vicious conflict
which is coming close to obscuring the crimes against humanity of 11 September?
Terror, terror, terror. Like a punctuation mark, the word infects every Israeli speech,
every American speech, almost every newspaper article. When will someone admit
the truth: that the Israelis and Palestinians are engaged in a dirty colonial war which
will leave both sides shamed and humiliated?
Just listen to what Sharon has been saying in the past 24 hours. "Arafat is an enemy.
He decided on a strategy of terror and formed a coalition of terror." That's pretty
much what President Bush said about Osama bin Laden. But what on earth does it
mean? That Arafat is actually sending off the suicide bombers, choosing the target,
the amount of explosives? If he was, then surely Sharon would have sent his death
squads after the Palestinian leader months ago. After all, his killers have managed to
murder dozens of Palestinian gunmen already, including occasional women and
children who get in the way.
The real problem with Arafat is that he has a lot in common with Sharon: old, ruthless
and cynical; both men have come to despise each other. Sharon believes that the
Palestinians can be broken by military power. He doesn't realise what the rest of the
world learned during Sharon's own 1982 siege of Beirut: that the Arabs are no longer
afraid. Once a people lose their fear, they cannot be re-inoculated with fear. Once
the suicide bomber is loose, the war cannot be won. And Arafat knows this.
No, of course he doesn't send the bombers off on their wicked missions to
restaurants and supermarkets. But he does know that every suicide bombing
destroys Sharon's credibility and proves that the Israeli leader's promises of security
are false. Arafat is well aware that the ferocious bombers are serving his purpose –
however much he may condemn them in public.
But he – like Sharon – also believes his enemies can be broken by fire. He thinks
that the Israelis can be frightened into withdrawing from the West Bank and Gaza
and East Jerusalem. Ultimately, the Israelis probably will have to give up their
occupation. But the Jews of Israel are not going to run or submit to an endless war of
attrition. Even if Sharon is voted out of power – a prospect for which many Israelis
pray – the next Israeli prime minister is not going to negotiate out of fear of the
suicide bomber.
Thus the rhetoric becomes ever more cruel, ever more revolting. Hamas calls its
Jewish enemies "the sons of pigs and monkeys", while Israeli leaders have variously
bestialised their enemies as "serpents", "crocodiles", "beasts" and "cockroaches".
Now we have an Israeli officer – according to the Israeli daily Ma'ariv – advising his
men to study the tactics adopted by the Nazis in the Second World War. "If our job is
to seize a densely packed refugee camp or take over the Nablus casbah, and if this
job is given to an (Israeli) officer to carry out without casualties on both sides, he
must before all else analyse and bring together the lessons of past battles, even –
shocking though this might appear – to analyse how the German army operated in
the Warsaw ghetto."
Pardon? What on earth does this mean? Does this account for the numbers marked
by the Israelis on the hands and foreheads of Palestinian prisoners earlier this
month? Does this mean that an Israeli soldier is now to regard the Palestinians as
sub-humans – which is exactly how the Nazis regarded the trapped and desperate
Jews of the Warsaw ghetto in 1944?
Yet from Washington comes only silence. And silence, in law, gives consent. Should
we be surprised? After all, the US is now making the rules as it goes along.
Prisoners can be called "illegal combatants" and brought to Guantanamo Bay with
their mouths taped for semi-secret trials. The Afghan war is declared a victory – and
then suddenly explodes again. Now we are told there will be other "fronts" in
Afghanistan, a spring offensive by "terrorists". Washington has also said that its
intelligence agencies – the heroes who failed to discover the 11 September plot –
have proof (undisclosed, of course) that Arafat has "a new alliance" with Iran, which
brings the Palestinians into the "axis of evil."
Is there no one to challenge this stuff? Just over a week ago, CIA director George
Tenet announced that Iraq had links with al-Qa'ida. "Contacts and linkages", have
been established, he told us. And that's what the headlines said. But then Tenet
continued by saying that the mutual antipathy of al- Qa'ida and Iraq towards America
and Saudi Arabia "suggests that tactical cooperation between them is possible?"
"Suggests?" "Possible?" is that what Mr Tenet calls proof?
But now everyone is cashing in on the "war against terror". When Macedonian cops
gun down seven Arabs, they announce that they are participating in the global "war
on terror". When Russians massacre Chechens, they are now prosecuting the "war
on terror". When Israel fires at Arafat's headquarters, it says it is participating in
the
"war on terror". Must we all be hijacked into America's dangerous self- absorption
with the crimes of 11 September? Must this vile war between Palestinians and
Israelis be distorted in so dishonest a way?
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
