-Caveat Lector-

Israeli media-psyops power openly ruling the world - via Washington.

- Even the US president is clearly powerless to face and stop it.

---------- Forwarded message ----------

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27151

Sharon 1, Bush 0
By Patrick J. Buchanan
April 9, 2002

Seventy-two hours after President Bush told Ariel Sharon to pull out of the
West Bank "without delay," the Israeli army was still pounding away at
Palestinians in the biggest offensive there since 1967.

"I meant what I said," an exasperated president railed at Sharon yesterday
afternoon. Yet, still, the Israeli war machine rolled on.

Round one in the clash between the president and prime minister thus goes
to Sharon. And before the president puts America's credibility on the line
again, he might reconsider. For in any face-off with Sharon, he is likely to
be rebuffed again.

And if Bush wants a measure of where Sharon's mind is, he might check out
the newest member of Sharon's ruling coalition.

Representing right-wing settlers, the National Religious Party is headed by
charismatic ex-general Effi Eitam, a man of deeply radical views. As the
Financial Times reports, Eitam has "urged Israel to destroy the Palestinian
Authority, bring Arafat and his associates to trial and reject any form of
Palestinian sovereignty in the occupied territories. The Palestinian state,
he said, should be established in Jordan and the Egyptian Sinai desert.

"Eitam also described Israel's Arab citizens ... as a 'cancer. ... (I)f a
war is forced on us, then in war, behave as in war,' he said. 'I can ...
see that as a consequence of war, not many Arabs will remain here.'"

In brief, Effi Eitam is an ethnic cleanser cut from the same bolt of cloth
as Slobodan Milosevic. Is the president aware of the breadth and depth of
the chasm that exists between what he believes is best for America and
what Sharon believes is best for Israel?

The president wants a negotiated peace between Israel and the Palestinian
Authority. Sharon believes that authority is a nest of terrorists to be
eradicated and openly regrets he did not kill Arafat when he had the chance
in 1982.

The president believes in the Oslo formula of land-for-peace and the Saudi
plan adopted by the Arab League, which calls for Israel to pull back
inside its '67 borders. Sharon rejects Oslo and land-for-peace and looks
on the Saudi plan as a formula for Israel's suicide.

President Bush believes Jewish settlements on the West Bank and in Gaza
are obstacles to peace, that their construction must be halted and their
dismantlement begun. As housing minister, Sharon was father to many of
these Sharonvilles and has continued to expand them even during this
intifada. And Effi Eitam did not come in to Sharon's coalition to help
tear down Jewish settlements.

Whatever one may say of him, the soldier Sharon is a serious man who will
go down fighting for what he believes is vital to his country. Does the
president have the toughness or tenacity to bend such a man to America's
will, or break him, if he believes it vital to America's interests? We're
going to find out.

In his coming clash with the president over the terms of a Mideast peace,
Sharon sees his place in history, his life's work and his country's
survival in the balance. And the politics of the issue dictate that Sharon
stand firm. After the Passover massacre, his war on the Palestinians has
sent his stock soaring. Some 72 percent of Israelis back his assault on
the West Bank cities and camps, and he has become again the most popular
man in all of Israel. Why should he back down to George W. Bush?

What leverage does the president have in a showdown with Sharon? If he
threatens to withhold the $3 billion in foreign aid Israel annually
receives, the president will face a firestorm in Congress and in his own
party. Already, his call for Sharon to pull out of the West Bank is
tearing at the seams of his political coalition.

Many conservative Christians back Sharon's war. The neocons, who rule the
op-ed pages, run the little magazines and contribute most of the TV
talking heads, side with Sharon. Conservative talk radio is against Bush
on Israel. If the president wants to assess the media firepower he faces,
he might look at "Alterman's List," that roster of media heavies – drawn
up by Nation magazine's Eric Alterman – who reflexively back Israel in any
dispute with the Palestinians.

Tony Blankley, one of the wiser heads among Washington pundits, believes
the president sent Powell to the Mideast to show the Arabs he is doing his
best to restrain Israel and has little expectation of success. But when a
president puts his credibility on the line like this and is brushed off,
he is diminished before the world.

As of today, it appears that, like Lola, whatever Israel wants, Israel
gets - and Sharon knows it. And now so, too, does George W. Bush.

If the president is not to be seen in the Arab world as Sharon's poodle, he
is going to have to stand up one day on his hind legs and bite his perceived
master. Is he up to it? Again, we're going to find out.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Patrick J. Buchanan was twice a candidate for the Republican presidential
nomination and the Reform Party’s candidate in 2000. Now a commentator
and columnist, he served three presidents in the White House, was a
founding panelist of three national television shows, and is the author of
seven books.

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to