>
> ===*===
>
> ILUSTROVANA POLITIKA (Belgrade, Yugoslavia),
> Issue 2197, February 24, 2001
>
> Who is Florence Hartmann-Domankusic?
>
> Her favorite word is sanctions!
>
> Few people know that this Frenchwoman, now the
> spokeswoman of Carla del Ponte, lived and worked for
> a long time in Belgrade as the correspondent of the
> Paris "Le Monde". Her "favorable reporting" on
> Yugoslavia in the past earned her the withdrawal of
> her reporter's accreditation
>
> by Ozren MILANOVIC
>
> In the past we have been threatened with sanctions by
> countries, international organizations and military
> alliances... Now we are being threatened by a woman
> who is the press representative to a prosecutor:
> Florence Hartmann-Domankusic, a Frenchwoman, the
> spokeswoman to Carla del Ponte, an Italian, in a
> court located in Holland. Like an angry Smurf, at
> press conferences held every day she lifts her finger
> and points at the southeast of Europe:
>
> "The Yugoslav government must not delay extradition
> of persons accused of war crimes. This preparation of
> a law on cooperation with the international tribunal
> seems like a bid to buy time. If cooperation doesn't
> begin within the foreseeable future, we will request
> the reinstatement of sanctions against Yugoslavia.
> Some of those sanctions were only temporarily
> suspended anyway until we see what the new government
> is going to do."
>
> Deafened by threats, frequently we don't put much
> effort into figuring out who is threatening us and
> why.
>
> Warning from Paris
>
> Dr. Marisa Marie Matei of the Paris "Teleobjektif"
> recently wrote an open letter of warning to the
> Serbian media:
>
> "How is it possible that no one has bothered to
> investigate Florence Hartmann-Domankusic's methods of
> work during the time that she was "Le Monde's"
> correspondent in Belgrade? To what extent she is
> objective and neutral, and consequently, the Hague
> tribunal as well, can best be seen by her articles on
> Gospic and Vukovar (a city whose residents were 67
> percent Serb before it was taken over by Croat
> Tomislav Mercep) before the bombing, as well as on
> Marin Selo and Pakracka Poljana, Paulin Dvor... while
> at the same time she searched Vojvodina with a
> magnifying glass looking to find a Croatian victim
> somewhere; and when she would find one, she would
> show all her foreign reporter colleagues whom she
> personally met and "joined" regularly at Belgrade
> Airport after learning of their arrival from her
> husband, one of the airport's directors. Isn't it
> strange that the file on the murder of Serbs in
> Gospic in 1991 disappeared from the tribunal archives
> at the same time that Mrs. Hartmann-Domankusic became
> Carla del Ponte's press assistant?"
>
> Mrs. Matei has a point; in the West, one's previous
> work is a very important determinant to one's further
> career. The fact that it is possible among the Serbs
> for someone to say and do one thing today and then to
> change it all tomorrow, the fact that our memories
> are short and we forget things quickly says more
> about us than about others.
>
> But let's take a look whether it is indeed Florence
> Hartmann-Domankusic who is threatening us with
> sanctions for lack of something better to do or
> whether there's more going on than meets the eye.
>
> This 37 year-old lady, who carries a French passport,
> received her first identity card for foreigners in
> Belgrade on June 2, 1989 as the wife of Engineer Emil
> Domankusic, employed at Belgrade Airport in Surcin.
> Emil is the son of General Stjepan Domankusic, a
> native of Slobodnica near Slavonski Brod /Croatia/,
> who served as deputy chief of the Security Department
> of the State Defense Council, who as a
> counter-intelligence officer was known in certain
> circles by the codename of Omega.
>
> Half a year later, on January 1, 1990, Florance
> Hartmann-Domankusic became employed by the Paris
> paper "Le Monde" and immediately became its
> correspondent in Belgrade. Then 26 years old, she was
> nevertheless a beginner in the difficult and
> responsible role of correspondent from a volatile
> region such as our own. She submitted a request for
> permanent accreditation to the Federal Ministry of
> Information and very quickly received a positive
> response thus becoming on April 20 of the same year
> an accredited correspondent of this influential
> French newspaper.
>
> On her application for accreditation she stated that
> she had been living in Belgrade since 1985 and that
> she spoke Serbian, Croatian, Italian, Spanish and
> English which in addition to her native French was a
> very decent number and a good recommendation for the
> whole world. At that time she stated that she was
> born in the small town of Neville on the Seine while
> later she would say she was born in Paris. Since
> accreditation must be renewed every two years, on the
> next application she filled out she stated that she
> had been living in Belgrade since 1987.
>
> Her "position"
>
> Her first articles in "Le Monde" hardly require
> reading between the lines and are clearly the work of
> an author with a predetermined "position".
>
> Thus, according to Florance Hartmann-Domankusic's
> writing, the Serbs occupied a third of Croatian
> territory, were illegally armed and (the still
> unrecognized republic of Croatia) needed to crush the
> ultranationalists relentlessly if it wanted to join
> Europe. Of course, readers of "Le Monde" could not
> learn from her articles that these Serbs were native
> to the region, that they had lived here for
> centuries, that they owned houses and property there,
> and that they did not come here from Serbia to occupy
> someone else's land.
>
> In her articles at that time, the Yugoslav People's
> Army, in which her father-in-law Stjepan held a truly
> enviable position, was written in quotation marks
> because it was not considered to be really Yugoslav.
> And when generals were replaced, Serbs and non-Serbs
> alike, she immediately interpreted this as a form of
> ethnic cleansing without bothering to mention who had
> worked for whom, who had spied, revealed state
> secrets or simply failed to follow orders.
>
> She was among the first to rush to Hrtkovce, a
> village in Srem, and to call what occurred there (a
> clash between Serb refugees from Croatia and Hrtkovce
> Croats) "the shame of Serbia".
>
> "The Croats of Hrtkovac fear for their lives. They
> are being threatened. Especially at night. Franjo
> Bericevic and his family are preparing to leave and
> go anywhere while the Maglic sisters have already
> left the house they have taken years to build...
> Mobilization is purposely being conducted here. They
> want to force the Croats into the Serbian Army and
> send them to the Croatian front line," wrote Florance
> Hartmann-Domankusic at the time, calling the Hrtkovce
> case "an attempt to frighten and expel all Croats
> from Serbia".
>
> She did not mention the fact, discovered at just
> about the same time, that prior to this, 32 young
> Croatian men from this village had gone and signed up
> for the Croatian National Guard.
>
> When clashes began in Bosnia, Zvornik was "liberated"
> from the Serbian paramilitaries, according to
> Hartmann. The cry to the world that Serbia must end
> its aggression against "Bosnia" had the same effect
> as the previous "occupation" by local Serbs of their
> own villages in Croatia.
>
> "The Muslims want a multiethnic, democratic Bosnia;
> the Serbs want to make it a part of a Greater
> Serbia"; this sentence in the influential "Le Monde"
> was a special message for the world.
>
> "Civilization of lies"
>
> Florence Hartmann-Domankusic then quoted a survey
> which she conducted herself and proved that "if the
> Serbs in Bosnia continue in the same fashion, they
> won't last for more than a few months. Their
> imaginary fairy tale will collapse like a house of
> cards".
>
> She predicted the same thing for the Serbs in Serbia.
> The name of Slobodan Milosevic was always linked with
> the attributes of strongman and butcher... She wrote
> that the opposition was weak and powerless and upheld
> the Greater Serbian aspirations of the strongman. She
> wrote in her newspaper about the young people and
> students who rebelled on March 9, 1991 that "even
> though they rebelled, the majority of them represent
> captives of a civilization of lies".
>
> And here is how she proved it:
>
> "Surveys show," she wrote, "that 40 percent of those
> surveyed blindly believe everything they see on state
> television news broadcasts. And a far greater number
> believe that the isolation of Serbia is the result of
> a world conspiracy against this nation, not the
> result of Serbian nationalist policies which resulted
> in bloody clashes in the region of the former
> Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia."
>
> She said the following about the "other side":
>
> "The Bosnian Territorial Defense only ordered a
> blockade of JNA barracks and their disarmament...And
> then the Yugoslav media jumped to the following
> conclusion: Bosnia and Herzegovina has declared war
> on the JNA."
>
> When the United Nations debated whether to allow
> imports into Serbia for humanitarian reasons, she
> opposed it with her commentary: "By doing so the UN
> would agree to feed the propaganda apparatus of
> Slobodan Milosevic which, according to the commission
> of the world organization for human rights, played a
> primary role in spreading nationalist hate."
>
> In her 1993 interview with the commander of the
> Yugoslav Air Force at the time, General Bozidar
> Stevanovic, Florence Hartmann-Domankusic said that
> "the bombing of Serbia" was not excluded and asked
> whether his air force were ready to defend the
> country. Caught off guard, the general thought a bit
> and replied: "We are ready to defend ourselves but I
> don't believe that this could ever happen. Should it
> happen, there would be heavy casualties on both
> sides."
>
> Among the first world reporters to start calling
> Croatia a country before its recognition, she also
> rushed to be the first to call Bosnia a country
> before its formal recognition in the United Nations.
>
> In an interview with Ibrahim Rugova she was full of
> praise for him and called him a cosmopolitan,
> tolerant and a democrat at heart.
>
> Our protest
>
> "Le Monde" is read by few people in Serbia and
> consequently her articles drew more attention in
> France and the rest of the world than at home. Thus
> among the first to react was Nedeljka Gluscevic of
> the Yugoslav Cultural Center in Paris, who had the
> opportunity to see and to read every issue of "Le
> Monde", and who addressed our officials and
> influential institutions both officially and
> unofficially, pointing out the malice in the writing
> of the correspondent from Belgrade.
>
> Mrs. Gluscevic's comments were also echoed by many
> Serbs living abroad, Serbian cultural clubs and
> various organizations. Many letters of protest were
> sent directly to "Le Monde" but very few of them
> passed, in shortened form, through the editorial
> sieve. In several direct responses to the writers of
> those letters, "Le Monde" defended itself citing
> freedom of the press, everyone's right to their own
> opinion and so on.
>
> It was as a result of these complaints by Serbs
> living abroad that the federal information minister
> at the time, Slobodan Ignjatovic, refused to renew
> Florence Hartmann's accreditation in April of 1994.
>
> According to one version, when she filed for another
> two-year renewal of her accreditation her application
> was simply rejected; this corresponds with the date
> her accreditation was originally issued - April 1990
> - and renewed for the first time - April 1992. Thus
> in April 1994, however it happened, Florence
> Hartmann-Domankusic was denied the right to continue
> reporting from Belgrade.
>
> Three years later, in May 1997, she told the Belgrade
> magazine "Intervju" that she had been denied the
> right to stay in the country which is not true.
>
> "The withdrawal of accreditation, in fact, meant
> automatic expulsion from the country because most
> foreign correspondents are non-citizens and their
> right to stay in the country depends on their
> reporter's accreditation. My life in Belgrade was not
> based only on journalism. I also had the legal right
> to stay in the country on the basis of marriage with
> a Yugoslav citizen. Nevertheless, the Belgrade
> authorities refused to allow me to return to the
> country where I had lived for eight years and where
> two of my children who also had Yugoslav citizenship
> were going to school. Four months after I was
> expelled I was allowed to return for 15 days under
> the condition that I report to the Federal Ministry
> of Information and sign a decision according to which
> I couldn't work according to Article 130-something of
> the Criminal Code which was generally used against
> Albanians and similar 'terrorists' because I
> allegedly conducted activities detrimental to
> Yugoslavia's imagine in the world. I didn't sign
> because I didn't feel it applied to me."
>
> We found no trace regarding her expulsion in the
> above-cited ministry but in the meanwhile, the
> "terrorists" have come to be called that by the
> entire world - with the exception of Florence
> Hartmann-Domankusic.
>
> A year after her "expulsion", that is, in 1995,
> Engineer Emil Domankusic resigned from his job at
> Belgrade Airport and moved out of the country. His
> apartment in Svetozara Corovica Street, which served
> as "Le Monde's" office, was sold, as was the other
> apartment he received a while ago in Karnegijeva
> Street.
>
> Through the Internet we discovered that he is now
> employed as one of directors of an airport in East
> Timor.
>
> Let's work together
>
> That Florence Hartmann-Domankusic liked to help her
> colleagues from abroad is proven by numerous
> collaborative reports from our region. Thus she
> visited Prevlaka with the female correspondent of
> "The Financial Times" and visited Vukovar and many
> other places with another female correspondent. In an
> interview with the magazine "Intervju" in May 1997,
> she said:
>
> "I never went after the scoop. I always shared
> information. If you work together, you collect more
> data. Besides, you cross-reference and compare
> information, you weigh different positions, you have
> access to more sources; all of this is necessary,
> especially in conditions under which it is difficult
> for reporters to work. I was frequently in dangerous
> situations and it is always better to be with someone
> then. For example, another female correspondent and I
> discovered Ovcara in November 1992. Before that the
> only information that was available was that there
> was a mass grave near Vukovar. And nothing more. No
> one wanted to say who the victims were."
>
> So it is thanks to Florence Hartmann-Domankusic that
> the story of Ovcara was heard around the world, that
> is, the Serbs were accused of conducting mass
> executions of Croats. Much later ,by the time the
> truth was finally revealed and it was discovered that
> the victims were, in fact, Serbs, Croats, Russians
> and Slovaks killed during the maelstrom of war, that
> they had been buried there due to fear of disease,
> and that their number was hundreds of times less than
> initially speculated, Florence Hartmann-Domankusic
> was no longer working for "Le Monde".
>
> Two years ago in Paris she published a book,
> "Milosevic: The Diagonal Moves of a Pawn", but did
> not get the publicity and earnings she expected. In
> the book her treatment of this politician is to
> accuse him of everything ugly that has happened in
> the Balkans in the last decade.
>
> However, this turned out to be just the ticket to get
> into the Hague tribunal. As an expert of Milosevic,
> she became the spokeswoman of Carla del Ponte last
> autumn - suddenly and to the surprise of many because
> the position did not previously exist. Louise Arbour,
> Carla del Ponte's predecessor, did not have a
> spokesperson.
>
> Many liked the charming and pleasant way in which the
> new official, Florence Hartmann, who quietly ignored
> the second surname of Domankusic still in her
> passport, rolled her "r's" when speaking either
> Serbian and Croatian, according to need. When she
> began to lecture President Kostunica and to threaten
> the entire nation with sanctions, Dr. Marisa Marie
> Matei of "Teleobjektif" spoke up to reveal who she
> was and to express doubts concerning the expedient
> disappearance of the Hague file on the Serbs
> massacred in Gospic ten years ago.
>
> At the same time in Croatia, 33 year-old retired
> general Mirko Norac, a former waiter from Sinj, is
> facing The Hague for crimes committed in Gospic ten
> years ago when he swore he was only accountable to
> Maks Luburic and no one else. Norac is now in hiding
> somewhere in Herzegovina, demonstrators in Croatia
> are preventing his departure to The Hague, declaring
> him to be a national hero, and the Croatian press is
> speculating that the secret file against him was
> "discovered" in time and that he was advised to
> "disappear".
>
> It would be interesting to hear Florence
> Hartmann-Domankusic comment on "the Norac case". She
> might start by explaining why she is not demanding
> that Croatia extradite him and why she is not
> threatening the country with sanctions if it fails to
> do so.
>
> This would be an objective and unbiased gesture on
> the part of the spokesman of an unbiased court.
> Anything else might be differently interpreted.
>
> Translated by S. Lazovic (May 31, 2001)
>
> /NOTE: After disappearing for two weeks, Mirko Norac
> turned himself in to Croatian authorities on Feb. 21,
> 2001 "after the International War Crimes Tribunal in
> The Hague said it would not attempt to try him" (BBC,
> Feb. 22). He and four Croats have been indicted for
> war crimes against Serb civilians by a Croatian
> court./
>
> ******
>
> HARTMANN: BELGRADE SHOULD FULFILL ITS OBLIGATIONS
>
> HAGUE, April 10 (Beta) - The Hague-based International Criminal Tribunal
>
> for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) spokesperson Florence Hartmann told
> BETA on April 9, that the Belgrade authorities should recognize and
> fulfill their obligations in respect to full and permanent cooperation
> with the ICTY.
> "Things are very simple. Obligations, which Yugoslavia must respect as a
>
> member of the UN, derive from the statute of the ICTY," Hartmann said
> regarding announcements from Belgrade that a law on cooperation with the
>
> ICTY could be adopted soon.
> "The cooperation should be full and constant. We expect that Belgrade
> will recognize and fulfill its obligations and that it will not create
> new obstacles to full cooperation and fulfilling all ICTY's orders,
> either now or in the future," said Hartmann.
>
> DRAFT YUGOSLAV LAW ON COOPERATION WITH THE HAGUE UNACCEPTABLE, HARTMANN
>
> WASHINGTON, April 9 (Tanjug) - Spokesperson for the chief  prosecutor of
>
> The Hague tribunal Florence Hartmann said that the  draft Yugoslav law
> on cooperation with that tribunal was  unacceptable. Hartmann told the
> Voice of America that for now as it has been  represented, with the
> details that are know, the law is unacceptable.
> Pointing out that Yugoslavia has its obligations and must comply  with
> them, Hartmann said that there can be no conditioning with the  law,
> there cannot be a difference in treatment under such a law,  because
> then some would be extradited to The Hague, and some others  would not
> be out of arbitrary and unknown reasons, so that  conditioning is
> absolutely unacceptable and as whole does not observe  obligations, or
> the primacy of obligations that exist in the Statute  of The Hague
> tribunal.
> Hartmann recalled that the tribunal prosecution has on a number  of
> occasions established that such a law is not necessary and that  they
> work under the Statute of the tribunal and will continue to  demand from
>
> Yugoslavia to fulfill its obligations under the Statute  of the
> tribunal.
>

Reply via email to