-Caveat Lector-
From
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=3936063&BRD=982&PAG=461&dept_i
d=467992&rfi=6
}}}>Begin
'Living in a police state'
By JOHN WISELY and STEPHEN W. HUBER, Of The Oakland Press
April 24, 2002
April 24, 2002
The state Legislature has given police power to search your home without telling you
why.
Two new laws, which took effect Monday as part of anti-terror efforts, also shield
from public scrutiny the reasons for police searches.
Defense lawyers and civil libertarians are outraged at the laws, which make search
warrants and supporting documents such as affidavits non-public records.
"If you think the police did secretive work before, just wait," defense attorney
William
Cataldo said. "It gives more power to the ignorant and more power to those who
would take your rights."
Defense lawyer Walter Piszczatowski said: "This is nuts, this is beyond nuts.
"What happened to the Fourth Amendment? We're living in a police state."
That means the public, the press, and in some cases even the person accused of
the crime, can't know why the police entered a home without permission.
Under previous laws, the records were public, unless a judge ordered them sealed
for a specific reason. In federal courts, that remains the case. But now, search
warrants in state courts are automatically closed to public view.
"I think this is absolutely unconstitutional," said Dawn Phillips, a First Amendment
lawyer with the Michigan Press Association. "We objected to it at the time. This thing
passed like greased lightning."
The House portion of the bill passed unanimously and the Senate version passed 27-
8. The chief sponsor of the bill in the state senate was Shirley Johnson (R-Royal
Oak) while Bill Bullard (R-Highland Township) was a cosponsor. In the state House,
Nancy Cassis (R-Novi) was among 20 sponsors.
The American Civil Liberties Union also objected to the law's change. ACLU
spokeswoman Wendy Wagenheim said the group is reviewing the law.
Law enforcement supported the changes. Oakland County Prosecutor David
Gorcyca said the laws protect victims, witnesses and confidential informants.
Gorcyca said the procedure for obtaining a search warrant didn't change, nor did the
rights of the defendant to challenge a bad warrant or the ill-gotten gains of an
illegal
search.
"When affidavits are filed, previously they divulged a large portion of the
investigation
and where it was heading and that could hamper the investigation and the direction
of the investigation," Gorcyca said.
"It doesn't mean you can circumvent the judicial process. All we're doing is
suppressing the contents of the affidavit. It does prevent the public and the media
from obtaining information during the investigation but it doesn't prevent the
defendant and the defense attorney from challenging the search warrant."
Gorcyca cited drug conspiracy cases as those where witnesses are frequently in
danger unless their identity is kept private during the investigation.
"In the drug world, witnesses are fearful all the time," he said. "Those are reluctant
witnesses who are afraid to come forward and testify. In those cases, fear and
intimidation is real. That's why grand juries are so vital. And this provides the same
secrecy as a grand jury and does not impugn anyone's rights."
Civil libertarians say those goals can be met with a much narrower approach, like the
one used in federal court.
"A judicial finding needs to be made on a case-by-case basis," said David Moran, a
constitutional law professor at Wayne State University in Detroit.
When police are investigating a crime and they believe evidence is stored in
someone's home, car or other private place, they must submit a sworn affidavit to the
court spelling out their case.
A judge reviews the document, then decides if there is enough evidence to search
without the owner's permission.
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires "probable cause" to issue a
warrant and notes they must be written "particularly describing the place to be
searched and the persons or things to be seized."
The changes are contained in two new laws - public acts 112 and 128.
State Court administrator John Ferry Jr. spelled out the changes to courts across the
state in a memo last Friday. Public act 112 makes "all search warrants, affidavits and
tabulations in any court file or record retention system nonpublic," according to
Ferry's memo.
The memo goes on to say that public act 128 "provides for suppression of a search
warrant affidavit upon a showing that it is necessary to protect an ongoing
investigation or the privacy or the safety of a victim or witness."
When contacted Tuesday for clarification on the memo, a spokeswoman for the state
court administrator's office declined comment. Marcia McBrien said the laws could
appear before the Supreme Court for interpretation and it would be improper for her
to offer one in advance.
The new laws could also create headaches for court recordkeepers. In many courts,
search warrants are filed along with the case file. It's unclear how clerks will keep
the
two separate.
The new law also affects the rights of people who are searched. According to a
analysis of the law done in the House of Representatives, the state Court of Appeals
ruled that affidavits be given along with a warrant at the time of a search.
The new law changes that.
"An officer executing a search is not required to give a copy of the affidavit to the
person or leave a copy at the place from which the property was taken," according to
Ferry's memo.
�The Oakland Press 2002
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
