-Caveat Lector-
From: chuck ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: radio imaging surveillance
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
View: Complete Thread (14 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-04-27 19:49:06 PST
Hi Infiltrate. Just by corresponding with me is bad for your health. I'm for
real and implants are used against millions of American's, Austrian's, German's,
Japanese and so on. The use of these devices is called the New World Order.
These devices are injected under the cover of law in investigations. Drug
Investigations are their favorite means of authorization, drugs are easy to
direct people to or plant as needed to target the person.
My implants were injected by the DEA who is a covert operation of the CIA. My
implants were injected in 1993 while I was working with the FBI against the DEA,
CIA and others. The use of these implants is one of the greatest secrets in the
world. (See Jose Delgado's research and book)
These devices are now used around the world and are the cause of Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome, Gulf War Illness, Fibromyalgia and many other illnesses and
conditions. These devices are used in horses to fix the horse races and are used
in dogs to fix the dog races, these devices are used in sports to fix the games
by injecting the players in drug investigations and are also used in the
Olympics to fix the events. These devices are responsible for many 1,000's of
deaths yearly and are responsible for the control of leaders that they do not
own. Heads of state are injected around the world with the devices and they are
widely used in your country by your government to cover up their control over
you as they tell you how free you are.
My lawsuit is now before the Supreme Court of the United States who is one of
the finest courts money can buy. My appeal before the Supreme Court is as
follows. I do not expect justice but I do expect to teach people who these
people really are and that you are really not free. Your freedom depends on who
you vote for and if you do what they have directed you to do. Chuck
In The Supreme Court of the United States
CHARLES AUGUST SCHLUND, III
and RANDY D. LANG,
Petitioners,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al,
Respondents.
On Petition For A Writ of Certiorari To The United States Supreme Court On
Appeal
from the Judgment on the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Charles August Schlund, III
Randy D. Lang, Attorney
Petitioners In Pro Per
8520 N. 54th Drive
Glendale, AZ 85302
(602) 670-2017 (M)
i
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
#1. Whether the joint failure and refusal of the Central District Court and 9th
Circuit Appellate Court to issue, per Petitioner's continuous written requests,
findings of fact and conclusions of law is a gross departure from the normal and
customary course of procedure and substantial violation of Petitioners' due
process rights, thwarting Supreme Court review and eliminating a record for
review by violating mandatory procedure, justifying the Supreme Court's
supervisory review. (See, Appendix 3).
#2. Whether the District Court and Appellate Court's continuous absolute
refusal to make findings and fact and conclusions of law, despite both
Petitioners continuous written requests, was improper and a gross judicial
retaliation after the court rejected Petitioner Schlund's verified and detailed
factual Motion to Recuse the same judge for bias and prejudice (and Appellate
Court's ratification) violated Petitioners' constitutional rights to a fair,
objective, and impartial tribunal and right to an adequate record for review to
the Supreme Court of the United States, requiring supervisory review by this
Court.
#3. Whether the District and 9th Circuit Appellate Court's continuous joint
failure and refusal to make any findings of fact and conclusions of law, in
direct disregard of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rules 43, 52(c), 56
and 65 and Petitioners' repeated written request and Petitioners' request per
Federal Rules of Evidence 201 (to take mandatory judicial notice of such
ii
requests and rules), caused prejudicial error by eliminating Petitioners'
factual and legal basis for review by the Supreme Court under Supreme Court Rule
14(i)(h)(i)(ii) and (vi), justifying its supervisory review. (See Appendix 3).
#4. Whether the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' refusal and failure to issue
findings of fact and conclusions of law on any of Petitioners' appellate motions
on appeal, per their continuous written requests, caused substantial prejudicial
error and violated their constitutional due process and equal protection rights,
leaving them without adequate record for review by the Supreme Court. (See,
U.S. Sup. Ct. Rule 14 (h)(i)(ii) and (vi) ["...findings of fact and conclusions
of law..."]).
#5. Whether the District Court's ratification over Petitioners' objection of
the Government's fabrication of unsupported facts, lacking in foundation and
with no affidavits or any other evidence and exclusively supported on irrelevant
attorney ipse dixit opinion, contrary to Petitioner's verified evidence, and
both District and Appellate Courts' continuous failure and refusal to comply
with both Petitioners' continuous written requests for findings of fact and
conclusions of law resulted in compounded prejudicial error, violating
Petitioners' constitutional rights (See Appendix 3).
#6. Whether the District Court's deviation from stare decisis violates the
standards of fair procedure rendering the judgment inconsistent with
Petitioners' constitutional rights as a matter of law (See Appendix 3).
iii
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING
The parties to this proceeding are Petitioners Charles August Schlund, III and
Randy D. Lang, Attorney, and Respondent, the United States Government,
Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
QUESTIONS PRESENTED i
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING iii
OPINIONS BELOW 1
JURISDICTION 1
STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED 1
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 2
Factual Background 2
Proceedings in Previous Courts 7
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION 13
CONCLUSION 22
v
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page
Cases
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 19
477 U.S. 242 (1986)
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 2,12,14,16,17,18,19,20
477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548 (1986)
Central Intelligence Agency v. John Cary 9
Sims and Sidney M. Wolfe, 471 U.S. 159,
85 L.Ed.2d 185 S.Ct. 1881 (1965)
Doran v. McGinness, 2,17,18,20,21
158 F.R.D. 383 (1994) ["Mental telepathy
mind control"]
Matsushita Electric Industry Co. v. Zenith 16
Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)
Siderman De Blak v. Republic of 2,5,11,19
Argentina, 946 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir. 1991) [Government Agents re: Torture]
Thomas v. Wichita Coca Cola Bottling Co., 16
968 F.2d 1022 (10th Circ.) cert. denied,
506 U.S. 1013 (1992)
vi
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - Continued
Page
U.S. v. Koyomejian, 970 F.2d 536 2,5,11,18,19
(9th Cir. en banc), cert. denied.
946 F.2d 1450 (1991) [This case only inter-
preted facts pertaining to the criminal context.
Electronic-force excessively intrudes to
grossly violate rights to privacy, especially as
to other parties coming in contact with subject
target of surveillance activities]
White v. Bateman, 11
89 Ariz. 110, 358 .2d 712 (1989)
Statutes
18 U.S.C. § 1964 1
26 U.S.C. § 2671 through 2680 2
28 U.S.C. 1254(1) 1
28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) 1
28 U.S.C. § 1356(b) 2
28 U.S. C. §§ 2671 through 2680 1
42 U.S.C. § 1983 1,2
42 U.S.C. § 1988 1,2
vii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - Continued
Page
Crimes Against Humanity: Protection Against 1,2
Torture Act [Initial Report of the United States of
America to the UN Committee re: Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment]
Protection of Human Rights Acts 1,2
The Civil Rights Act, now known as 2
the Electronic Communications Act of 1986 (18 U.S.C.
§§ 2510-2520) (1988) [Title I]) and The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets
Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. §2510-2520) (1968) [Title III]) including, however not
limited
to the aforesaid].
U.S. Constitution
First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, 1,2
Fourteenth, and Seventeenth Amendments
to the United States Constitution
Supreme Court Rule
Supreme Court Rule 14(f) 1
Supreme Court Rule 14(h)(i)(ii) and (vi) 11,13,14,21
[Findings of fact and conclusions of law]
viii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - Continued
Page
Fed. Rules of Procedure
Fed. Rules of Civil Proced., Rule 43 2,13,21
Fed. Rules of Civil Proced., Rule 52 2,10,11,12,13,21
Fed. Rules of Civil Proced., 2,9,10,12,13,15,16,21
Rule 56
Fed. Rules of Civil Proced., Rule 65 2,10,11,12,13,21
Fed. Rules of Evidence
Rule 201(b) [Judicial notice of request 2,14,21
for findings of fact and conclusions of law]
Restatement 702 13
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Appellant Charles August Schlund, III and Randy D. Lang, Attorney
("Petitioners") in Pro Per, respectfully petitions for a Writ of Certiorari to
review the Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
in this case.
OPINIONS BELOW
The opinion of the Court of Appeals (Appendix No. 1) was ordered not for
publication. The opinions of the District Court (Appendix No. 2) are
unreported.
JURISDICTION
The Court of Appeals entered its decision on December 14, 2001 (Appendix No.
1). No Petition for Rehearing was filed. The jurisdiction of this court is
invoked under 28 U.S.C. 1254(1).
STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
Because the text of the citations are too voluminous, Petitioner hereby
complies with Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States ("Rule") Rule
14(f). References are to U.S. Constitutional Provisions, Federal Statutes,
Executive Issuances and include: the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh,
Ninth, Fourteenth and Seventeenth Amendments to the United States Constitution;
Federal Torts Claim Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 through 2680; 28 U.S.C. §1346(b); 18
U.S.C. §1964; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988; Protection of Human Rights Act; The
Convention Against Torture and Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment of June 26, 1987; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 43, 52, 56,
65 and Federal Rules of Evidence 201(b); and the conflicting decisions of (1)
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) [ Summary Judgment]; Doran v.
McGinness, 158 F.R.D. 383 (1994) ["mental telepathy mind control"]; and Siderman
De Blak v. Republic of Argentina, 946 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir. 1991) [Torture by
Government officials].
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Factual Background
Under the Federal Torts Claim Act, 26 U.S.C. §§2671- 2680; 28 U.S.C. §1356(b);
42 U.S.C. §§1983 and 1988; The Protection of Human Rights Act: The Convention
Against Torture and Cruel, Inhumane, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; and
the Civil Rights Act all serve the purpose of holding responsible under civil
and criminal law individuals who violate the individual rights guaranteed under
the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Fourteenth, and Seventeenth
Amendments of the Constitution of the United States which are intended to
protect individual inalienable rights. These Acts have been integrated and are
now known as the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986 (18 U.S.C.
§§2510-2520 (1988) [Title I]) and the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act
of 1968 (18 U.S.C. §§2510-2520 (1968) [Title III]) and applied to other domestic
statutes to the states as well, receiving federal funds which are omitted in the
interests of judicial economy but reserved hereat as a matter of right.
There have been a few cases, Koyomejian, Siderman De Blak, Doran, of most
importance, which have focused primarily on their application to the criminal
context involving the use of electronic force technology to grossly invade
protected zones of rights to privacy and illegal electronic force torture under
color of authority. And, illegal invasion of privacy as they apply to gross and
excessive electronic technology invasions on the issues of (1) the gross
intrusive degree of invasion of privacy through modern electronic force methods
and (2) the use of modern or state- of-the art electronic technologies which are
integrated for use of and to have the effect of physically and psychologically
torturing individuals selectively targeted, including the torture of political
witnesses against corrupt Government officials or those believing such illegal
conduit is appropriate due to being compelled to accomplish same by supervisory
order as lower echelon employees fearful of losing their status and jobs.
There are inconsistent Appellate decisions in the United States Appellate
Courts' sparse publication of such extremely narrow opinions, and there is a
gross lack of continuity in the application of law in these areas nationwide, as
applied to the civil arena involving Governmental acts and conduct of a nature
and degree classified under the category of "torture" and "gross invasion of
privacy" now requiring Supreme Court Review and clarification for continuity of
the application of law by attorneys in our nation and the government officials
using these electronic technologies (See Appendix 3).
Appellant Schlund, an ex-United States Marine, was solicited by the United
States Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA") to participate in various activities of
an illegal nature under color of authority. After receiving information about
the activities, he refused. He was then set up by the DEA with fabricated
evidence and arrested and charged as being an alleged drug manufacturer in Cave
Creek, Arizona. The conspiracy by the DEA to fabricate the evidence was a
planned scheme designed to enable them to create a"pretext" for reasonable
suspicion and probable cause for creating a joint investigation task force to
place Appellant Schlund under surveillance, to violate his privacy and due
process, remove Schlund as a witness to corruption in the DEA, and to violate
other constitutional protection and those of whom he comes in contact with.
Also, to discredit him as a political witness and utilize electronic
surveillance for information gathering concerning all those with whom he comes
in contact, violating other historical and constitutional rights of such
person(s) including, but not limited to, the attorney- client privilege,
physician-patient privilege, spousal privilege, clergyman-penitent privilege,
privacy of voting privilege, privacy of association, privacy of speech, etc.
The gross "electronic force" intrusions were also made of his body, personal
residence, papers, affects and things. He asserts in his verified Complaint
("Complaint") and in many affidavits and documents filed in the case that during
one or more of the episodes of electronic force torture, subcutaneous body
implants of a CIA design were used by the DEA ("Electronic Implants") and
separately various forms of electronic force vibration, sounds, magnetic fields,
radio waves, and other known forms of torture have been imposed upon him through
excessive "electronic force" commonly referred to as (excessive force) resulting
in psychological and physical torture of Schlund as a form of retaliation and
violation of his civil rights, causing him extensive losses and damages
personally and in his commercial activities as pled in detail in his verified
Complaint and corroborated in this case (See Appendix 3).
Petitioner Lang, an attorney, asserted a single declaratory relief cause of
action, asserting the Government does not have the right to use sophisticated
surveillance telecommunications activities and other integrated devices and
methodologies to violate his rights to privacy due to his association with
Schlund or other members of the public or to harass, torture, or otherwise
violate his or other third parties' rights of privacy with whom he associates,
or violate protective privileges also set forth above based on Schlund's
personal knowledge. Lang asserted the course of intervention for a declaratory
judgment is necessary to prevent such violations under color of authority or
retaliate against him for his association with Petitioner Schlund (See, Appendix
3), as well as the judicial necessity to clarify or modify existing law on this
unique "electronic force" privacy intrusion issue of first impression due to it
being recently exposed and rapidly burgeoning in exposure as to the government's
use of such integrated computer etc. electronic technologies whose existence and
use have been intentionally covered up and repeatedly denied by the Government
but was, as always, later exposed then admitted to by it.
Although tedious and continuous efforts over a rather lengthy period of time,
heavily cloaked in a convoluted myriad of distorted secrecy and public lies, the
Government's illegal continuous violations of human rights and rights to privacy
are being forced to the surface of truth by the courts (i.e., Koyomejian,
Siderman De Blak, etc.). This includes its "scorched earth" policy of
committing perjury, witness tampering, judicial coercion, and fabrication of
evidence all classified as contemptible "outrageous Government conduct" by the
Hon. Judge Lacey (Id., infra).
Petitioner Schlund's Criminal Acquittal. Despite the fact the DEA violated
their oath of office and federal and U.S. Constitutional laws while acting under
the pretext of color of law for the purpose of fabricating evidence, perjured
testimony, and other illegal acts outside the course and scope of their
authority, and in violation of Petitioner Schlund's constitutional rights (See
Appendix 3), Petitioner set the matter for a jury trial. It was established at
the trial that the Government used an alleged "informant" who lied to induce
Schlund by means of illegal entrapment to come to the location of a laboratory
under false pretenses. The laboratory was set up by the Government to suck
Schlund into the entrapment posture to remove Schlund as a political witness
against the DEA to conceal massive corruption in the DEA. Petitioner Schlund
did go to the location, where he was recorded by electronic surveillance cameras
and other integrated telecommunications related devices and methodology, showing
Schlund performing various legal activities at the Government's (DEA) directions
at the property located in Arizona (See Appendix 3). Petitioner Schlund then
left the residence where the so-called laboratory was located and was followed
by the joint task force of Government surveillance agents who then arrested him
without a warrant and alleged on probable cause they believed he was operating
an illicit methamphetamine laboratory (See Appendix 3).
Later, on January 3, 1979, Petitioner Schlund, after a jury trial, was
"acquitted" in the United States Central District Court, Phoenix, Arizona of all
charges of conspiracy, etc. related to the trumped up drug charges that were
created to remove Petitioner Schlund as a political witness against the DEA.
The Dept. of Justice ("DOJ") appealed that decision, and the decision was
sustained in favor of Schlund by the 9thCircuit Court of Appeals (See Appendix
3).
<SNIP>
====
From: chuck ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: JFK Movie
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
View: Complete Thread (23 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-06 09:43:20 PST
Yes I read the CIA, FBI, NSA and other files on the assassination of JFK in 1977 and I
later worked
with the FBI and others against those responsible. In 1993 the DEA who is a covert
operation of the
CIA framed me as being a drug dealer and injected implants in my ears and neck and has
tortured me
since then. In 1997 I filed a lawsuit against them for the use of torture and took it
through the
finest Federal courts money can buy including the United States Supreme Court. The
courts never denied
anything and even admitted much of it but refused to allow me a trial as they do all
real witnesses.
Chuck
Dr_Lorenzo_il_Magnifico wrote:
> chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > The film was very accurate but it did not go far enough. The assassination
> > of JFK was part of the Systematic Overthrow of America by the CIA. Chuck
>
> And you say this with a straight face????
====
Subject: Electronic Control and Torture
From: chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 July 1999 11:06 PM EDT
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The following information may be of some help to those that are victims
of mind control.
The following is a posting from me to everyone. It will be hard for you
to except but is the best and most truthful information you can get.
I understand that my story is beyond what normal people can comprehend
but it is not the ravings of a mad man it is the truth. As I worked with
the FBI against the satanists I would only supply the FBI with
information in a controlled manner. I would first set up the bad guys and
then prove the information was correct. Then I would supply the
information to the FBI and others. The following information is correct
to the best of my memory which is some what distorted due to the
continual torture of me by those I was testifying against. I believe
that the following information is the closest to the truth of any
information on the inter net. If there is anything in this information
that is incorrect it will only be a very small mistake by me due to the
torture of me by my enemies.
The following is what you people call mind control as it is applied to
the general population to control people.
In the spring of 1977 a group of friends of mine that were investigating
the assassination of Don Bolles and corruption in Arizona received from
a burglary a pick-up truck full of CIA, DEA and many other kinds of
government documents. Don Bolles was a newspaper reporter in Phoenix
Arizona who was assassinated with a car bomb. In these files and papers
we had the designing, testing, manufacturing and use of a new kind of
bugging device. These devices were being produced into many different
models depending on their intended use.
In the 1960's and the 1970's the CIA through many 1,000's of experiments
had mapped out how to control the human mind and body using an
electronic device that was designed like no other device before it. The
human body and mind operates on electrical impulses on the nerves to and
from the brain. These electrical impulses are of a very low DC voltage
and operate on very low mil amperage. By designing a bugging device that
operates on a much larger voltage which was 5 VDC and on a much higher
amperage they found out they could over power the bodies electrical
system. The standard monitoring device was designed to be made or
installed into clothing, jewelry, or other things that were in contact
or in a close proximity with the human body. By installing these device
in a close proximity to the human body they discovered that by altering
the magnetic fields and frequency produced from these devices they could
control the health and mental abilities of the targeted individual.
These devices are and were used by the 10's of millions against the
American people. People that these devices are used against develop the
diseases known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Epstein Barr Virus, The
Yuppie Flu and diseases are also known by many other names. The
standard way they used these devices on me from 1980 until 1991 was to
replace my Levi Button on my pants. The new button was made with the
device made into the button. This device operated when I scanned them at
724.56 MHz. This device completely controlled me mentally and
physically. I suffered horribly from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Of the
known 17 million Americans suffering from depression I would guess that
about 12 million of these are from the effects of this device. There are
of course many millions more that suffer from the effects of these and
similar devices. The disease caused by these and other devices is an
auto immune response of our bodies. You may refer to this response as an
allergic reaction. To control this reaction you could use pretizone for
short periods of time with it offering some relief. Stimulants such as
speed or cocaine could also alter the reaction and also give some relief
but of course this is illegal and unhealthy. The only way of terminating
the control and torture is the removal of the devices. The longer the
exposure to the devices the greater the effects of the devices.
I found out that by buying new clothing and removing all jewelry and
every thing else that I carried in my pockets and by staying away from
home that day, that all the horrible things happening to me would stop
and I would return to normal. If I would buy new clothing and take them
home they would gas me that night and install the devices in the
clothing. If any of you wish to test this on yourself it may prove that
what I'm telling you is truthful. All depression would go away and I
would feel like I was a kid again. I would laugh and have a great time
that day until they would come in and reinstall the devices.
The following is another kind of device that was in these files and
papers. The CIA believed it was necessary to monitor the troops in
battle so they could control the battle from behind the battle field.
This device was a very small inject able micro chip. This device could
be injected into the troops before they entered the battle field in one
of their vaccination shots. This device could be injected into the arm
or butt or any where else in the body. This device would allow the CIA
to hear not only what the service men and women were saying but
everything else on the battle field. This device was designed so it
could not be turned off. This was done in case any enemy found out about
the device. These devices would last about 9 to 12 years and the service
men and women would suffer greatly from the effects of these devices.
You know the disease that these devices caused as The Persian Gulf
Illness and Agent Orange Sickness.
The following is the most sophisticated devices the CIA designed for the
torture of political prisoners in the United States and it is used
through out the western world. This form of inject able implant is the
type that the DEA injected into me to conduct the cover up of their
crimes against the American People and me. These devices were first
injected into me in 1977 after reading their files to monitor and
control me. This device works very similarly to the others in the
monitoring mode but is totally different in the torturous modes. This
devices is far more complicated than the others and is in its self a
miniature computer. To reduce the size of this device to the point where
it could be injected they needed to design a new system to replace the
micro chip. In these files Bell Laboratories had designed a new film
that was only I believe 3 microns thick. This new film was then etched
with the circuitry on both sides of the film. Then the film was
insulated with a spray that was only one micron thick. This film could
then be folded and then rolled to fit into the implant. Then a duel
factor capacitor was added. One factor for the bugging device and one
for the torture modes. Then the power supply was added which was a
bi-metal power supply. After everything was was fitted together the
implant was then injected with a fine glue to bond everything together
so it couldn't shake apart during the torture modes. Needless to say it
was blood cooled by the body it was injected into.
In 1993 while I was working with the FBI against these satanists they
conducted a covert operation against me, which resulted in a court order
to inject two more of these devices into my neck. These are an improved
version of the above model I read about in 1977. With these devices they
have satanically tortured me daily since 1993 to deprive and or limit my
freedom of speech. I have submitted motions to the Federal court twice
to terminate the torture and the court has to date refused me relief
from torture. This is a violation of American law and International law.
These people are above the law, they are the law and they have committed
these satanic acts against the American people all these years under the
cover of the law. Chuck
=============================================================================
Subject: Electronic Torture
From: chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 July 1999 03:38 AM EDT
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I would like to know if they torture others that I haven't wrote to in
the same way they are now torturing me. The following is a typical day
for me at present.
I wake up or they wake me up with a real hideous sound in my ears. It
starts pulsing at about two pules per second. Then they ever so slowly
increase pulses of these pulsed sonic weapons until it becomes
impossible to tolerate the pain. At this point they start tightening the
tendons in my left leg until the pain is to the point that I'm
screaming. Then they increase the pulses until they become much more
rapid to some where between 50 to 100 sonic shock waves a second. At
this time the pain in my leg begins to diminish. This takes about two
hours. Then they collapse all my vanes in my feet at first and then
latter my arms and hands which causes me to lose most if not all the
feeling in my feet and hands. Then I enter the shower and they change
the torture mode to a constant scream in my ears and tear at my throat.
Some times they very this mode until it feels like their tearing my
heart out. After the shower I have to lay back down and recover from the
torture session in the shower for about 30 minutes. During this period
of time they ever so slowly turn the power down until I'm again able to
stand up. I then get dressed. (They have increased the torture
dramatically now to threaten me for typing this letter. There crushing
my scull and I'm in extreme pain this is a common mode they use to
threaten me) Once they see that I'm dressed and going to make it to the
door and go to work they drop the mode they were using completely off. I
then leave for work. When I'm about one half mile from the house they
then bring up a mode they use to try to force me into accidents. This
mode feels like a magnetic mode they used to use but its not an extreme
magnetic field. This mode crushes my brain and puts me in agony. I
usually scream for periods and then they reduce the torture for periods
and then they bring the torture back up. This torture session lasts
until I stop at the store or until I'm where I'm going. At this point
they again reduce the torture for different periods of time depending on
what there trying to accomplish with the torture. Once they know I'm
working on a major project they dramatically increase the torture using
a very powerful and very raped pulsed torture mode to stop me from
working. If I get on my cell phone they stop the torture session so I'm
not screaming on the phone. If the job is something where there's not
1,000's of dollars involved they decrease the torture to a point where
I'm almost normal. After the work day is over they again torture me
satanically on the way home, differently from day to day. Once I'm back
at home they again use a different type of pulsed mode which they change
depending on what I'm doing. If I try to take a nap they increase power
to a hideous mode to stop me. If I try to watch TV they will allow it
and reduce the torture if I don't say anything political. If I say
anything political about what is on TV they dramatically increase the
torture to stop me from watching TV. If I go into the computer room and
work they again change modes which severely disables my ability to type
or reason to deprive me of my ability to function. They usually change
torture modes or reduce power at about 1:30 to 2:00 AM. I then then go
to bed and it take them between 30 minutes to 2 hours to then slowly
reduce the torture to the point where I can sleep.
This is the nicest they have been to me in many years. I think someone
is watching that there paranoid about. They use to rob me every week and
enter my home at night or while I was at work daily. They have now
stopped robing me and gassing me at night. The torture has been reduced
to these levels slowly over the past two and a half years. The Gassing
has stopped as far as I know for about 5 years. I'm interested in if
there are others that are tortured to the extent they torture me. Thanks
Chuck
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
