--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
June 4, 2002
"They all knew"
I don't know if the following appeared in its
print edition, but it is on the web site of
the San Francisco Chronicle, the largest
newspaper in Norther California and normally
among the world's most obtuse media outlets.
"Don't let them fool you, folks: They knew.
They might have been surprised by the ferocity of the
attacks,
but the highest-ranking members of the George W. Bush
administration knew before Sept. 11 that something terrible
was going to happen soon.
Bush knew something was going to happen involving
airplanes.
He just didn't know what or exactly when. His attorney
general,
John Ashcroft, knew. His national security advisor,
Condoleezza Rice, knew. They all knew.
And, in spite of its apparent ineptness, the FBI knew,
too."
Source:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?
file=/gate/archive/2002/06/0
3/hsorensen.DTL
Imagine that. In a mass circulation, establishment
newspaper.
Sounds like the ravings of a 'conspiracy nut' doesn't it?
Could it be that San Francisco's city fathers, who happily
turn a blind eye on election fraud and its own police
murdering innocent people in cold blood, don't want to be
part of a system that includes the destruction of downtown
real estate in major US cities as part of its domestic
policy?
The question for me now is will this currently freewheeling
mass media discussion be shut down? There used to be
similarly
lively discussions of the preposterousness of the Kennedy
assassination cover story in the mass media. Then those
discussions disappeared, altogether and at once.
"A categorical statement can be made that management and
editorial policy, measured by what is printed and broadcast
in all major American news media organizations, supports
the findings of the Warren Commission. This has been true
since 1969, but it was not true between 1964 and 1969."
Source:
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ToA/ToAchp9.html
Now here's some simple million dollar questions about
the current situation:
1. If they knew - and it seems obvious to even the most
dense that they did - why did they sit on their hands
when four - count them FOUR - commercial airliners
went dramatically off course? Assuming the details
were a surprise, the basic story line certainly was
not. This was NOT a shot out of the blue.
2. Why, nearly a full hour after the first tower was hit
(8:45am EST) and over 40 minutes after the second was hit
(9:03am EST), were the 'ready to go' 24/7 fighter planes
on Andrews Air Force base just outside of Washington DC
still sitting on the ground leaving a city that is a well
known terrorist target wide open (9:43am EST)
3. Why does the news media continue to feed us
footage of small piles of ammunition being 'discovered'
in caves in Afghanistan, but never shows us pictures of
the multi-billion dollar CIA-funded, bin Laden constructed,
George Bush Sr. directed 'Pentagon' we built for Islamic
fundamentalist terrorists deep in the Afghan mountains
during
our 1980s proxy war against the Soviets.
4. Why is it that lately whenever there are major flare
ups that 'provoke' the US into doing something
extraordinary
and extra-legal militarily in other part of the world,
Al Qaeda is the group that coincidentally provides the
people
to pull the trigger to get things going.
I'm talking about 1) Yugoslavia,
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm
2) the World Trade Center, and now, 3) the Indian-Pakistani
region,
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,4436862%
255E401,00.html
5. If Pakistani intelligence created Al Qaeda on
behalf of the CIA to fight the Russians in Afghanistan
in the 1980s - a fact which no informed person disputes -
(source: http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm)
and the US still has its largest overseas installation
in Pakistan and the US military collaborated with
Al Qaeda in the Balkans as recently as 2001,
when exactly did the US military-intelligence
complex 'lose track' of what Al Qaeda was up to?
Infiltrate Al Qaeda? Eavesdrop on Al Qaeda? Who needs
to do that when you're writing them checks?
Further isn't it odd that the 'head' of Al Qaeda is:
1) a former Saudi playboy who visited the US and
worked with the CIA, 2) part of a family that
is deeply involved with the finances of the
Bush family, and 3) is perennially un-findable
Here's a Sudanese perspective on Osama bin Laden
that appeared after the embassy bombings in
Africa:
http://www.aboutsudan.com/issues/terrorism/osamabin.htm
Another Bush-bin Laden collaboration: Bank of Credit and
Commerce
International.
"Osama first became involved in the terrorist business
through
his cousin and patron, the late Sheikh Salim M. Bin Laden,
the billionaire owner of the family's Bin Laden Brothers
Construction,
and one of the four Saudis whom Prince Philip invited to
join
his 1001 Club. As a result of this patronage, Sheikh Salim,
became a major stockholder in the Bank of Credit and
Commerce
International, the cash-cow that British intelligence and
the
Bush crowd used to finance the 1980s Afghanistan War.
Sheikh
Salim was close to Bush since at least 1979, when he became
a
business partner with Bush's son, George W. Bush, the
current
Governor of Texas, and would-be President of the U.S., in
the
Bush family's Arbusto Ltd."
You don't hear much about that, do you? Maybe because so
many
of the people who've written well about Bush family
criminality
end up committing suicide in motel rooms like
Danny Casolaro: http://www.cjr.org/year/91/6/octopus.asp
and
J.H. Hatfield:
http://www.salon.com/politics/red/2001/07/20/blue/
and one, few people have heard about, an *artist* who
became fascinated with creating a graphical representation
of links between the Bush Family, BCCI, and other
Saudi-Pakistani
crime operations. His work BCCI-ICIC-FAB actually hung in
the
Whitney at part of its "Pollock to Today" show in 2000.
Later that
year, Lombardi reportedly hung himself on his 50th
birthday.
Mark Lombardi: http://www.wburg.com/0202/arts/lombardi.html
Note too that George Bush feels the need to go into
60 countries to root out terrorism. If that's so, why
doesn't he drop his calling card on the Al Qaeda members
we KNOW are active in the Balkans, continuing to
destabilize
that region?
Here's a humorous bit of double talk published by the
Council on Foreign Relations telling us not to worry
about Al Qaeda in the Balkans:
http://www.cfr.org/public/resource.cgi?pub!4344
The above is a way of suggesting that the 'shocking'
revelations you're reading about in the newspapers
this week are a lot less than the full story.
It all boils down to this:
By spectacular coincidence, a group we created, funded,
trained and armed - which through the family affiliations
of
its leader has direct financial ties to the powerful and
legendarily corrupt political family currently in the White
House - regularly engages in acts of photogenic mayhem,
thereby
demanding our military presence in the very parts of the
world we happen to most want to permanently base our
troops.
Now how's that for a coincidence?
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Kwick Pick opens locked car doors,
front doors, drawers, briefcases,
padlocks, and more. On sale now!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/ehaLqB/Fg5DAA/Ey.GAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
