-Caveat Lector-

>From http://asp.washtimes.com/printarticle.asp?action=print&ArticleID=20020603-
93683813

}}}>Begin
The Washington Times
www.washtimes.com



Judge deal irks GOP in California

Ralph Z. Hallow
THE WASHINGTON TIMES Published 6/3/2002



     Republicans are beginning to go public with complaints that President Bush
surrendered an important presidential prerogative when he gave Democratic Sens.
Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer unprecedented veto power over prospective
federal judicial candidates from California.
     "As state chairman, I can't sit still and see Boxer and Feinstein pre-selecting
federal judges when we have a Republican in the White House. That's not what I
came here to do," said Shawn Steel, the elected chairman of the California
Republican Party.
     A major complaint about the bipartisan judicial-selection deal worked out with the
two Democratic senators is that Mr. Bush's negotiator, California investor Gerald L.
Parsky, got nothing in return.
     "The deal already has crashed and burned," a prominent Republican House
member from California said privately. "It's discriminating against highly qualified
candidates because they supported Bush for president or contributed to the
campaign of a Republican for Congress."
     But Mr. Parsky, a defender of the bipartisan committee system, says he is doing
only what the president and White House Counsel Al Gonzales asked him to do.
"Some of the critics don't know the facts," Mr. Parsky said.
     White House defenders of the deal said its aim was to help smooth the judicial-
appointment process by having the Senate Judiciary Committee hold more hearings
and vote on more Bush nominees � and do so more quickly � than in previous
administrations.
     Senate tradition allows a senator to veto or "blue slip" any federal judicial 
nominee
for courts in his or her state. The Bush White House said its plan would give the two
California senators an incentive not to "blue slip," by giving them a voice in the
selection.
     Under the year-old agreement, dubbed "the Parsky Commission," the White
House gives the two Democratic senators power to block the White House from even
seeing the names of candidates for the eight federal district judgeships in California.
     Critics complain that Democrats chosen by the state's two senators to sit on the
unique selection commission decide what names among applicants for judgeships
will be forwarded to the White House. These critics claim that under the agreement,
the White House may make nominations for Senate approval only from that list of
names.
     Critics also claim that when the White House has attempted to suggest a
candidate of its own, the Democrats on the Parsky commission have gotten their
backs up.
     Mr. Parsky, a member of the state party board of directors which last year
stripped Mr. Steel of some powers that normally accrue to the party chairman, said
the bipartisan commission was not his proposal, but that of White House chief
strategist Karl Rove and Mr. Gonzales.
     "They researched precedent and found there was none for selecting federal
judgeships when a state has no U.S. senator or governor" of the president's party,
Mr. Parsky said.
     Mr. Gonzales talked with Mrs. Feinstein first and one suggestion that emerged
was that there be two Republican names forwarded to the White House for every
Democrat name, according to a Republican close to the process.
     Instead, Mr. Gonzales and Mrs. Feinstein came up with the idea of four
committees, each representing one of the four U.S. district courts in California. Mr.
Parsky and the White House would decide on the three Republicans to serve on
each committee and Mrs. Feinstein and Mrs. Boxer would appoint the three
Democratic members. Mr. Parsky further said he got the approval of the White
House at every step of the way.
     "I only pass on people who satisfy the president's judicial philosophy," Mr. 
Parsky
said.
     He said he and Sen. Feinstein instructed the committees not to ask "litmus test"
questions, but at least two persons who appeared before the committees told The
Washington Times they had been asked by the Democratic members for views on
issues, including whether they would support Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court
decision that legalized abortion. Both of these candidates say they were nixed by the
Democrats on the committee and so their names never went to the White House for
consideration.
     But Mr. Parsky said he knew of only one such incident and that he immediately
informed Mrs. Feinstein and told the committee involved that such conduct was not
permissible.

Copyright � 2002 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.



Return to the article
End<{{{

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to