-Caveat Lector-


<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-






>From: Joseph Wanzala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Corn on NPR
>Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 22:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>Below this rather telling article from
>http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=184912
>is this comment about Corn that is interesting.
>
>
>David Corn on NPR (english)
>former Nation admirer 8:13pm Fri Jun 7 '02
>  comment#184918
>
>I heard David Corn, who writes about Capital Hill for the Nation, on NPR
>today discussing the new plan for a Department of Homeland Security. He was
>with David Brooks of the Weekly Standard, a neoconservative (warmonger)
>magazine published and edited by William Kristol.
>
>I was shocked by the similarity of their analyses. Corn said nothing, not
>even lip service, about the civil liberties implications of this new
>agency. I can't remember exactly what he said, but he basically viewed it
>in terms of partisan politics, saying something to the effect that Bush's
>proposal would take the wind out of the sails of Democratic critics of
>Bush's actions before 9/11. Again, I can't remember what David Brooks said,
>but it was basically this same Washington insider type of analysis.
>
>David Corn seemed not at all concerned that this Ministry of Homeland
>Security is obviously timed to divert attention away from the congressional
>investigation. Perhaps this isn't surprising given that Corn has already
>prejudged the results of that investigation.
>
>David Corn and the Nation have lost any credibility they had with me.
>
>
>--------------------------------------
>
>Plan Was Formed in Utmost Secrecy
>re-post 7:26pm Fri Jun 7 '02
>  article#184912
>
>Final Proposal Came From 4 Top Bush Aides; Most Others Out of Loop
>
>By Dana Milbank
>Washington Post Staff Writer
>Friday, June 7, 2002; Page A01
>
>The proposal was designed largely by just four of President Bush's most
>trusted senior aides, meeting for 10 days in a bunker-style, secure
>conference room beneath the White House.
>
>Those sessions, in late April and early May, were the beginning of a
>seven-week deliberative process secret even by the standards of a Bush
>administration known for its discipline and control. By the time of
>yesterday morning's meeting of Bush's 20 most senior aides, the majority
>did not know the details of the plan to create a new cabinet-level
>Department of Homeland Security.
>
>Even Cabinet secretaries were kept in the dark about the plan until
>informed Wednesday -- and senior officials in the departments affected by
>the realignment learned about it from news reports yesterday morning.
>
>Congressional leaders, too, were unaware. Hundreds of lawmakers attending
>the White House barbecue Wednesday night had no idea what was unfolding.
>The only two believed to have been briefed, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert
>(R-Ill.) and Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), were told during
>the picnic. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.), author of legislation much
>like the White House's proposal, got a call from Homeland Security Director
>Tom Ridge Wednesday night asking about details of his bill -- but Ridge
>didn't give a hint of what was coming in the morning.
>
>White House officials say it was a coincidence that Bush's announcement of
>a new cabinet-level Homeland Security Department came on the anniversary of
>D-Day. But it's no accident that the decision and announcement resembled a
>military operation in its precision and stealth as they assembled a
>proposal for what Bush called the most significant reordering of the
>federal government since 1947.
>
>White House officials figured that the element of surprise would give their
>proposal a better chance of success. Early leaks, they said, would have
>allowed opponents, particularly committee chairmen who stand to lose
>authority under the proposal, to gain the initiative. "This will not be
>easy for Congress, but it will be easier with a big head of steam,"White
>House press secretary Ari Fleischer said.
>
>Veterans of the Clinton administration expressed grudging admiration. Could
>this have been kept secret in the Clinton White House? "Quite honestly?
>Unlikely," said David Leavy, spokesman for the National Security Council
>under Clinton. "They have a very small loop in terms of top-line
>information, and that allows them to control news flow in a way you have to
>admire."
>
>The potential danger with the Bush administration's approach is that by
>restricting the number of people involved, it may not obtain the necessary
>input. Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee issued a statement
>saying this resulted in "a haphazard plan." Bush aides say they got plenty
>of input, from Congress and Cabinet agencies -- before officials sat down
>April 23 to draft a plan.
>
>On that day, White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr., Ridge, White
>House counsel Alberto R. Gonzales and Office of Management and Budget
>Director Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. convened their working group to create the
>cabinet-level entity. They relied on a few other top aides, including Card
>deputies Joseph Hagin and Joshua Bolten.
>
>The meetings continued daily for about 10 days as they refined the
>proposal's specifics. Card or Ridge kept Bush informed of progress. On May
>3, Card described the tentative plan to Bush. To flesh out the details, the
>group then expanded slightly to include a few officials from Ridge's office
>and lawyers from Gonzales's office -- though most of those officials knew
>of only their pieces of the proposal. Hagin served as "the enforcer" during
>this time. He kept the proceedings limited to "those who truly needed to be
>involved," as an aide put it, and reminded them, repeatedly, "This is the
>president's news to make."
>
>Even some of the most senior Bush aides, including counselor Karen P.
>Hughes, political strategist Karl Rove, Fleischer and speechwriter Michael
>Gerson, didn't join the process until last week, officials said. As of
>Wednesday, officials said, fewer than 20 aides had knowledge of the plan.
>
>Bush, briefed on it on his way to Europe aboard Air Force One on May 23,
>gave his final sign-off last Friday, May 31. At that point, a "roll-out"
>team -- communications director Dan Bartlett, his deputy, Jim Wilkinson,
>Fleischer, Cheney aide Mary Matalin; and Ridge spokesmen Susan Neely and
>Gordon Johndroe -- drafted a minute-by-minute communications plan for their
>D-Day release, and they assembled a 24-page booklet detailing the plan.
>
>The rollout began Wednesday, with one-on-one meetings with most of the
>Cabinet members who would lose jurisdiction to the new agency; they had
>input before April 23 but not during the plan's formulation. Even Joe M.
>Allbaugh, whose Federal Emergency Management Agency would be entirely taken
>over by the new office, was not briefed until Wednesday, officials said.
>Allbaugh is a longtime Bush aide and was manager of his presidential
>campaign.
>
>Wilkinson said it was a triumph of the White House's no-leak strategy. "The
>president makes the news and calls the plays -- we just run the plays he
>calls," he said.
>
>Wednesday night, the proposal booklet was sent to the printers in the
>basement of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building to be printed
>overnight, guaranteeing that the word would stay in the White House. To
>keep reporters off the trail, the White House issued a press release
>yesterday announcing "NO PUBLIC EVENTS" on Bush's schedule for today and
>scheduled a 12:15 p.m. briefing by the press secretary that would not, in
>fact, be held.
>
>The operation began in earnest Thursday morning at the 7:30 senior staff
>meeting. The vice president and other senior officials began to brief key
>lawmakers, and at 10 a.m., he walked into the briefing room to give the
>announcement. After the briefing, the White House sent out a page of
>talking points, first to allies on Capitol Hill and then to governors and
>supporters around the country, thousands in all. Bush aides scheduled
>briefings throughout the day and fanned out to speak on talk radio and
>cable news shows and online chats, and to regional editorial boards.
>
>Yet, even after the announcement, administration officials were reluctant
>to say what they knew about the proposal and when. FBI Director Robert S.
>Mueller III, asked at a hearing if he was consulted, replied: "I believe
>that I should not be forthcoming."
>
>
>© 2002 The Washington Post Company
>
>www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A... add your own comments
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I'm calling my senator tomorrow (english)
>m. 7:56pm Fri Jun 7 '02
>  comment#184915
>
>And let him know that the whole system is in jeopardy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup




_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- End Message ---

Reply via email to