-Caveat Lector-
>From http://washingtontimes.com/national/20020622-42082444.htm
}}}>Begin
The Washington Times
www.washtimes.com
Security bill bars blowing whistle
Audrey Hudson
THE WASHINGTON TIMES Published 6/22/2002
A provision in the bill seeking to create a Homeland Security Department will
exempt its employees from whistleblower protection, the very law that helped
expose intelligence- gathering missteps before September 11.
The legislation now before Congress contains a provision allowing the director of
the proposed agency to waive all employee protections in Title V, including the
Whistleblower Protection Act. The act protects government employees from
retaliation or losing employment for speaking out on waste, fraud and abuse.
FBI Agent Coleen Rowley blew the whistle on her agency for mishandling a
probe of terrorist suspect Zacarias Moussaoui, who has been indicted by a federal
grand jury on six counts of conspiracy in the September 11 attacks. Mrs. Rowley
testified before a Senate panel earlier this month that a "climate of fear" prevented
an aggressive investigation of the man whom authorities believe was to be the 20th
hijacker.
As the 21-year veteran testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee,
President Bush proposed the new Cabinet position in a prime-time televised
address.
The protection exclusion has concerned members of Congress and civil-liberties
activists. "I don't think we want to just let a provision like that sail through
without
taking a close look at it," says Rep. Bob Barr, Georgia Republican.
"If you look back at recent history, it has been a very, very important aspect of
ferreting out the truth regarding government actions. Much of what we know that
went wrong in the White House in the '90s was initially highlighted by special agent
Aldrich." The reference is to Gary Aldrich, who wrote "Unlimited Access: An FBI
Agent Inside the Clinton White House."
Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Iowa Republican, sent a letter Wednesday to Tom
Ridge, White House homeland security adviser, asking that the administration
guarantee full application of the act to employees of the proposed department.
"Whistleblowers are key to exposing a dysfunctional bureaucracy," Mr. Grassley
says.
Since the September 11 terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade
Center, government agencies have placed a greater emphasis on secrecy and
restricted information for security reasons, he says. "With these restrictions come a
greater danger of stopping the legitimate disclosure of wrongdoing and
mismanagement, especially about public safety and security. Bureaucracies have
an instinct to cover up their misdeeds and mistakes, and that temptation is even
greater when they can use a potential security issue as an excuse."
The U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service last month was required to pay
back wages and cancel suspension and demotion orders for two Border Patrol
agents who told a newspaper about security problems along the U.S.-Canadian
border.
The agents, assigned to the INS field office in Detroit, were recommended for
discipline after they told the Detroit Free Press that Michigan's border lacked the
resources to adequately protect the country from terrorists. Agents Mark Hall and
Robert Lindemann said the 804 miles of shoreline border were guarded by 28 field
agents, one working boat, several damaged electronic sensors and one broken
remote camera. They were cited for not following instructions not to talk to reporters
and recommended for 90-day suspensions and one-year demotions.
The exclusion of the whistleblower law is also opposed by the American Civil
Liberties Union, which says protections against retribution for those such as Mrs.
Rowley would not exist in the new agency.
"It's very scary. The public needs to know what the government is doing," says
Tim Edgar, legislative counsel for the ACLU. "Sometimes, it hurts Democrats;
sometimes, it hurts Republicans, but it's always informative and even more
necessary to protect whistleblowers in homeland security than any other
government agency. It's not just tax dollars spent wisely, but doing what we need to
do to keep people safe."
Other elements of the plan are long on secrecy and short on accountability, Mr.
Edgar says.
The department would not be required to release information under the Freedom
of Information Act. This would eliminate the agency's responsibility to answer
questions from the public. Advisory committees that normally include public input
would be immune, and the Cabinet secretary would have veto power over inspector
general audits and investigations.
"We need to know real facts, and not just spin from the agency," he says.
• Jerry Seper contributed to this report.
Copyright © 2002 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
Return to the article
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
