--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
Please FORWARD.
PENTAGON VIDEO EVIDENCE SHOWS
FRAUD OF WAR ON TERROR
By David Bosankoe, B.Sc.
----------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION - By World-Action, UK.
THE PHONEY GLOBAL 'WAR ON TERROR':
<> IF there is to be a global effort against terrorism,
it must be based on clear and proven foundations,
and executed with the pure aim of making the world
a safer place for all to live. The present 'War On Terror',
recently begun by the Bush Administration of the USA,
is founded on the completely unproven assertion that
the outrageous attacks of Sept 11, 2001, were planned
by people foreign to the United States, and who lived
outside the USA. On the contrary, since Sept. 2001,
hundreds of substantial pieces of data have been
assembled by numerous investigators worldwide
which clearly indicate that the atrocities of September
2001, were completely organised and carried out by
people WITHIN the highest echelons of the Bush
Administration and by powerful associates of the
Bush Administration. If YOU are concerned for the
future of the world, please FORWARD to as many
people as possible. It is imperative that the true
facts of Sept 11th, 2001, are now brought to public
attention, for the safety of the whole world. <>
Please FORWARD to as many people as
possible - Information of World Importance.
-------------------------------
PENTAGON VIDEO EVIDENCE SHOWS
FRAUD OF WAR ON TERROR
By David Bosankoe
A few months ago the American Department of Defence
released to the World Media the five security-camera
(CCTV) frames that capture the attack on the Pentagon
in Arlington, Virginia that occurred on September 11, 2001.
These frames were broadcast across the Internet News
agencies where I was able to pick them up and enlarge
them, after which I joined them together in a single
animation file which can be found on my website at:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/pentagon.gif
- approx 160kb.
My attention was initially brought to these frames as
I was searching for evidence in support of my position
in an argument with Dick Eastman, an American who
regularly posts his analysis, forwardings and links to
uk.politics.crime and other newsgroups. We were
arguing over the French web page, "Spot the Boeing":
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
Eastman was expounding his theory of an internally
planted bomb and, to show him his error I went to the
BBC and did a search for 'Pentagon' and found the
CCTV images. That's when I made my first animation
from the frames. Shortly before, American investigator,
'Agent Fescado,' provided on the website,
http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/pent.html,
his own analysis of the CCTV stills based on evidence
that included his own enlargement of the first frame in
the sequence with added overlays of different aircraft,
using the position and size of the tail fin of the actual
attack craft shown in the first frame as the reference
for determining scale and position of the overlay.
What he found was that the profile of the plane
captured in the frame when compared to the fitted
overlay of a Boeing 757, where the tail fin of the overlay
is fitted to exactly cover the visible fin of the attack
aircraft in the video, was far shorter than a Boeing 757
(a rather obvious observation which nevertheless I later
proved with mathematical rigor on my web site).
What Fescado also found was a tail-fin fitted overlay
of an F-16 made for a very reasonable fit, as also do
other small military aircraft such as S-3B Viking (a craft
which has been suggested by one of Agent Fescado's
sources as the true Pentagon-attack culprit.).
Exactly which small military aircraft was responsible
for the attack, is a question that must not distract from
the now-established finding that the Boeing 757 of
Flight 77 was not the aircraft that the CCTV visually
captured, an aircraft which in my estimation is less
than half the length of the 757).
Afterward, I found the Internet source for the MSNBC
Flash animation of the CCTV images and extracted
the Flash file out of their page, allowing me to use the
inbuilt zoom function in Flash which includes a pixel
interpolation function so I could quickly extract
smoothed pictures. I've explained how to trace my
steps in all this for you who want to 'do it yourself' at:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/howto.htm
I then used a shareware version of Jasc Animation
Shop to string this together in an 'animated GIF' which
so many have now seen thanks to Dick Eastman.
When comparing proportions in the first frame, the
height of the Pentagon's wall, 70 feet, with the 155 feet
length of the Boeing 757, it becomes blatantly obvious
that actual attack plane is far too short. This finding
led me to look at the size of the hole that the plane made.
When the plane crashed into the Pentagon, it first of all
made merely a hole and, only later, after fire crews had
arrived on the scene, did the outer wall of Pentagon
above this hole collapse.
Fortunately, someone who was on the nearby freeway
and passing the Pentagon during the first moments of
the attack had his camera with him and managed to get
some really good shots of this hole (see my homepage:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk ).
Its size is surprising. I approximate it to be between two
and three meters across. Not only was the hole too small
for a Boeing 757 to have made, there was also an obvious
lack of plane wreckage. The wings were nowhere to be
seen. There was no luggage, seats, or other debris that
one expects from this type of crash.
Later, I saw the damage report on the extent of the
internal damage. That too was inconsistent with a
mid-sized airliner crash.
But that is just the beginning. In the first CCTV image
a white smoke trail is visible to the right following the
plane. However, the problem with this is that jet contrails
only happen at high altitudes when the water vapor from
a jet's exhaust freezes into a trail of visible ice crystals.
So the only explanation of this white smoke is that it is
the rocket-engine emission from a small missile.
This conclusion is supported by evidence in the
second image, where the initial fireball appears vividly
as the flash explosion consistent with a small missile
warhead. On two counts of visual evidence, therefore,
we see that a missile was launched at the Pentagon
by the attacking plane.
So in conclusion, instead of knife-armed terrorists with
limited flight experience hijacking a modern passenger
plane and flying it into the Pentagon at ground level, we
are forced to conclude that a military jet with auto pilot
capabilities flew into to Pentagon, firing a missile just
ahead of impact.
Also remarkable is the choice of the point impact, a
point only metres away from the only fire hydrant on
that side of the building. This was the hydrant for the
heliport, with underground tanks, in case of helicopter
crashes. (Again see my homepage). Whoever planned
the attack likely was thinking of damage limitation.
So, now knowing that the attack craft was not a Boeing,
it is abundantly clear to me that the US Government has
lied to us about Sept 11th. I can only conclude that they
did the deed themselves as a propaganda operation to
'justify' to the American people (and their allies) their
sought-for war against the Taliban and their 'War on
Terrorism.'
Also, from other people's investigations it has
become clear that this was all done for oil and opium
and geopolitical gain, and NOT to liberate the women
of that country from restricted Islamic lifestyles
(a worthy enough cause, but certainly not a decisive
motive for this particular war.)
My own line of 911 research has been has been restricted
to the Pentagon attack. However, I have added many links
and articles to my web site referencing investigations
parallel to my own, including, especially, questions raised
by the World Trade Center attack. There are many questions
that the US Government should be answering about that.
Among the most notable I can recall are these:
"Why was there a big increase in insider trading
just before the attack?",
"Why were CEO's from the WTC invited to a charity
dinner at around 8am on the morning of Sept 11
at an air base?" and
"Why did the twin tower collapse the way they did
(like a controlled demolition, falling straight
down and not toppling over)"?
Dick Eastman, at my request, has provided
me with his own summary points:
===============
SUMMARY POINTS - By Dick Eastman
I. MOTIVES:
1] Getting the pipeline the Taliban had rejected;
2] Control of the mineral wealth of Afghanistan;
3] Generating a popular and sufficient reason to attack
Saddam Hussein (whom both father and son Bush
have long wanted to see dead);
4] Continued sustainability of the infamous "ring" of
Afghan opium becoming Chinese heroin becoming
laundered revenue proceeds becoming investment
capital building new Chinese industry forcing the
relocation of industry away from U.S. territory;
5] Big money for the FBI, CIA, military industrial complex;
6] Destruction of WTC-housed evidence in the biggest-ever
illegal oil swap case;
7] Destruction of WTC-housed evidence in the biggest-ever
gold price fixing case (illegal selling of Federal Reserve
gold to elites at way below obtainable market prices);
8] Getting the FBI off white collar and bank crime
(i.e. introducing total anarchy to the sphere in which
the U.S. investment bankers, currency traders,
derivatives makers etc. operate);
9] Having the CIA ("Capitalism's Invisible Army" as
R. Buckminster Fuller called it) take over the FBI (the
more legitimate and traditionally constitutional of Federal
investigation and intelligence agencies) and in so doing
purging the FBI of leadership sympathetic with anti-
globalist, populist, nationalist, constitutionalist, or
pro-sovereignty thinking -- in fact it is the druglords
taking over the constabulary; and last,
10] Accomplishing pre-emptive war set-up to look like
retaliatory self-defence, i.e., picking fights, against all
"potential" terrorists by setting-up the those suspected
of being capable of resorting to terror, actually conducting
terror themselves so they can pin the blame on those they
want to decimate, those who stand in the way of their
economic and geopolitical dominance.
II. REMOTE-CONTROL CRASHES:
EgyptAir flight 10.31.99 -- clear case of remote-control
take-over; data captured on blackbox voice recorder and
on instrument recorder make it unmistakable that the
plane was taken over against the will of pilot and co-pilot
(a voice -- English, not Arabic, actually is heard in the
voice recorder saying "control it" at the moment the
controls begin to misbehave -- the efforts to refute this
have only landed the government in deeper in a coverup
--EgyptAir and the Egyptian government accept this
view and not the obviously cooked findings of the U.S.
review board.)
New York flight in Queens -- breaks up in air -- after
rudder begins moving first right and left -- breaking off
the tail fin -- another whitewash by U.S. aviation officials
as well.
Miami Flight -- rudder goes wild on its own, then stops.
This was a "test" of the remote-control systems.
Ron Brown's crash in Croatia -- same deal, and then,
to make sure Ron Brown got a bullet in the head by the
first "rescuers on the scene.
The Plane that hit the South tower. Note the Japanese
video showing another aircraft streak by at the moment
of impact -- presumably a guidance aircraft or a missile
to do the job in case the plane missed its intended target.
(very little data on this besides the video itself, so we tend
to leave it alone, but it is definitely part of the big picture.
III. PENTAGON "SMALL JET":
This is the "smoking gun" that could finish the crime
syndicate responsible for 911 -- unfortunately the crime
syndicate knows this very well and the American people
have hardly begun to get the word.
1. DoD video -- the Bosankoe evidence.
2. Small hole -- the French evidence and the photo
from the freeway.
3. Witness accounts -- those who saw a horizontal
approach claim the plane was too small to be a
Boeing 757 -- many military men who did not see
said they heard a jet fighter, some heard a missile.
4. Air traffic controllers claim plane behaved like
a military jet.
IV. STANDDOWNS:
1. Intelligence -- FBI prevented from investigating
(after merger with the CIA they won't even try, btw)
2. Air interceptions -- could have, but didn't -- ordered
not to -- many, many sources on this; many officials
(Cheney, Rumsfeld) caught in falsehoods
V. PHONEY BIN LADEN VIDEO (Dick says: I have
lots of analysis of this that are on no site that I know
of -- I had forgotten this until now)
VI. EVIDENCE OF PRIOR PLANNING and attempts to
enlist other nations in war against Afghanistan pre-911
(Powell in India, most especially; but many others)
And the lesser stuff:
<> Bush's behavior on the day and subsequently.
Rice's statements before 911. <> Wolfowitz's lightening
appraisal and conclusion that war on Afghanistan is
necessary. <> Economic links of Bush, Cheney etc.
to profiteering from exactly this war. <> The short-sells
and where they lead.
===============
DAVE BOSANKOE, B.Sc., U.K.
My home, including enlargements of
the CCTV frames and other analysis:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk
My archive of articles and related news article links:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/keynews.htm
Links to other investigations into the US
Governments complicity on September
11th and various other related links:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/links.htm
----------------------------------------
THE PHONEY WAR ON TERROR:
<> IF there is to be a global effort against terrorism,
it must be based on clear and proven foundations,
and executed with the pure aim of making the world
a safer place for all to live. The present 'War On Terror',
recently begun by the Bush Administration of the USA,
is founded on the completely unproven assertion that
the outrageous attacks of Sept 11, 2001, were planned
by people foreign to the United States, and who lived
outside the USA. On the contrary, since Sept. 2001,
hundreds of substantial pieces of data have been
assembled by numerous investigators worldwide
which clearly indicate that the atrocities of September
2001, were completely organised and carried out by
people WITHIN the highest echelons of the Bush
Administration and by powerful associates of the
Bush Administration. If YOU are concerned for the
future of the world, please FORWARD to as many
people as possible. It is imperative that the true
facts of Sept 11th, 2001, are now brought to public
attention, for the safety of the whole world. <>
--------------------------------------
Please FORWARD to as many people as
possible - Information of World Importance.
PLEASE FORWARD - NOW.
- Thank You.
----------------------
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
