-Caveat Lector-

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/76988_helen3.shtml

Bush acting as imperial president

Wednesday, July 3, 2002

By HELEN THOMAS
HEARST NEWSPAPERS

WASHINGTON -- The imperial presidency has arrived. On the domestic front
President Bush has found that in many ways he can govern by executive order.
In foreign affairs he has the nerve to tell other people that they should
get rid of their current leaders.

Amazingly, with Americans turning into a new silent majority and Congress
into a bunch of obeisant lawmakers, he is getting away with such acts.

The lawmakers are worried that Bush will play the "patriot card" in the
November elections to attack dissenters and opponents. The Democratic
leaders have already rolled over. They have given him a blank check by
passing the USA Patriot Act, which permits outrageous invasions of privacy,
and by seconding Bush's foreign policy with a weak "me too."

Whatever happened to congressional oversight? I remember all too well the
senators who gave President Lyndon B. Johnson a free hand to do whatever he
believed was necessary in Southeast Asia. They lived to regret it. The
result was the Vietnam War that ripped our country apart.

The list of the president's self-empowerment moves grows almost daily and
will continue unless the Supreme Court calls his hand.

Did I say Supreme Court? Forget it. Not with this court. It handed him the
2000 election, and it would probably cite some World War II decisions that
allowed the government to violate citizens' civil rights, especially those
of Japanese Americans, in the name of national security.

Civil rights are now clearly being ignored by government agents in the war
on terrorism who want to make the vulnerable detainees talk. The agents'
methods of extracting information are not disclosed. And the imprisoned
suspects and material witnesses cannot get in touch with lawyers or their
families.

I'm not talking about Russia's infamous gulags. I am talking about us. The
president made the arbitrary decision to designate as a foreign "enemy
combatant" the Brooklyn-born Jose Padilla, who is suspected of being an
al-Qaida scout seeking to locate targets for a "dirty bomb" attack. He is
being held incommunicado in a military brig without due process of law and
without being charged.

Where are the great constitutional law experts who might protest such
treatment? It appears they have bowed to the exigencies of our time and are
accepting Bush's end-runs around the law involving some 2,400 detainees, who
are reportedly being held indefinitely by U.S. authorities. Can Americans
really tolerate the denial of rights to these people?

Overseeing much of the chipping away at our privacy and other civil
liberties is Attorney General John Ashcroft.

He is enthusiastically using the patriot law to let federal agents wiretap
and access the e-mail of untold numbers of citizens and to listen in on
conversations between lawyers and clients. Now FBI agents are checking lists
of readers at libraries and book stores. Is book burning in our future?

Ashcroft also sent a memo to federal agencies promising that the Justice
Department will back them up anytime they want to deny freedom of
information requests from scholars and journalists.

Here, he is protecting Bush from criticism over the administration's
clamp-down on government information. Rest assured he could not do this
without the imprimatur of the White House.

We should not forget that Bush, early in his tenure, blocked the
implementation of the release of President Reagan's White House papers.
Under the Presidential Records Act of 1978, his official documents were to
be available to the public 12 years after he left office. So they were due
for release last year, but Bush simply overrode that law.

Was he trying to protect Reagan from the probing of historians and the
media? Or was he really trying to protect his father, George H. W. Bush, who
was Reagan's vice president and who succeeded him as president? White House
aides issued a flimsy excuse-- that the order was designed to institute an
orderly release of the papers. But my guess is that No. 43, as W calls
himself, was trying to protect No. 41.

Equally blatant examples of Bush's arrogance of power are in his foreign
policy. What right does he have to tell Yasser Arafat that he has to go or
to tell the Palestinians they cannot vote for Arafat in coming elections?
Bush's speech could have been written by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon. Although he speaks of his compassion for the suffering Palestinians
under Israel's military occupation, Bush is tightening the screws by making
it clear he will deny them any aid unless Arafat is deposed.

Plans to topple Iraq's Saddam Hussein have also been on the president's
radar screen since he took office.

When did the United States get the right to tell other countries and people
who should lead them?

The president has been flexing America's military muscles and threatening
pre-emptive first strikes against nations suspected -- suspected! -- of
wanting to harm the United States. That also is a break with our past
traditions.

Bush is due for a reality check. We need allies whenever we contemplate such
drastic actions, and our allies are worried about his constant saber
rattling. Some day he is going to try to give a war and nobody is going to
come.

---------------

Helen Thomas is a columnist for Hearst Newspapers.
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copyright 2002 Hearst Newspapers.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to