-Caveat Lector-

From
World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org




WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : Britain

Lord Weinstock and the near terminal decline of British industry

By Jean Shaoul
27 July 2002

Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author

Lord Weinstock, the former managing director of GEC, Britain’s premier engineering 
corporation, died
Tuesday July 23 at the age of 77 years. Variously eulogised as “Britain’s best 
manager” in the Financial Times
and a “giant of industry” in the Guardian, it is instructive to review his career to 
understand what constituted
his much vaunted success.

For more than three decades until he retired in 1996, Weinstock presided over and 
profited from the demise
of Britain’s electrical engineering industry at the expense of hundreds of thousands 
of workers in Britain and
countless more in the former British Empire.

His career epitomises the economic decline of British capitalism, its corporatist 
approach, its dependence upon
the state owned industries and the Ministry of Defence in the post-war period, and 
latterly its bankruptcy in
the face of global capital. Weinstock pioneered the hostile takeover in the 1960s, 
which he used to create a
monopoly position in the electrical engineering and defence electronics industries. 
His obsessive concern with
ruthless cost cutting, rationalisation and sackings in search of profits made him a 
role model for other CEOs.
Never a self-publicist like other members of the nouveaux riches, he became the 
trusted advisor of four prime
ministers, from Labour’s Harold Wilson in the 1960s to the arch-Conservative Margaret 
Thatcher until 1984.

Born in Stoke Newington, London, Arnold Weinstock was the fifth and youngest son of 
middle- aged,
relatively prosperous working class Jews from Poland. Orphaned when he was 11 years 
old, he was later
evacuated during the war to Warwickshire. He did well in school, gaining a place at 
the London School of
Economics.

Graduating in 1944, he did his military service at the Admiralty, working on 
government procurement in the
Production and Priority Branch at Bath. In 1947, he returned to London. With the help 
of one of his brothers,
Weinstock soon found work with a property investor, Louis Scott, where his task was to 
sort out the planning
applications and finances. Scott was an early exponent of the sale and leaseback 
technique, now one of the
major money-spinners of the property world. This, plus the lifting of controls on the 
construction industry in
1954, led to a new breed of property multi-millionaires that included Weinstock’s boss.

During his stint in property development, he met and married the daughter of the 
wealthy founder director of
Radio and Allied Industries, a company that assembled radios, televisions and other 
electrical goods. In 1954,
the ambitious young man went to work for his father-in-law and put his financial 
skills to work in an
engineering context. There he learnt that the key to financial success in assembly 
line production was high
volumes and tight cost control, since assembly work, as opposed to component 
manufacturing, requires
relatively little labour and hence generates low profits. Weinstock turned the company 
into the premier
assembler of electrical goods for the now burgeoning consumer market.

By the early 1960s, Britain’s European competitors had rebuilt their factories with 
newer more advanced
technologies and once again traditional British industries faced competition, falling 
profits and excess
capacity. At the same time, Britain’s bosses faced a very militant working class 
determined to defend their
jobs, wages and conditions.

In 1961, Radio and Allied made a takeover bid for the giant but ailing GEC. With sales 
revenues 20 times
larger than Radio and Allied, GEC was the smallest of the big three electrical 
engineering companies supplying
equipment to the nationalised electricity and telecommunications industries. Weinstock 
introduced financial
information systems and tight budgets to control operations that were so successful in 
turning round his
division of GEC that he was offered the position of group managing director in 1963.

With no engineering training and less than nine years of industrial experience, 
Weinstock had risen to become
CEO of one of Britain’s largest heavy engineering companies. He set about reorganising 
the company.
Unprofitable divisions were closed. Workers and managers were laid off. Company 
headquarters were moved
to smaller, less luxurious premises. He started buying up companies.

GEC was fortunate in that the incoming Labour government under Wilson actively 
encouraged the merger
and consolidation of Britain’s fragmented and antiquated manufacturing industry. 
Wilson established the
Industrial Reorganisation Commission (IRC) under Tony Benn, to create “national 
champions” able to compete
on the world markets, and gave it an initial £150 million to fund ventures. The second 
half of the 1960s saw a
wave of mergers, often hostile, the like of which had never been seen before.

Unquestionably, the largest and most controversial was GEC’s takeover of Amalgamated 
Electrical Industries
(AEI), its larger and more conservative rival, mounted with the IRC’s backing and 
financial support in the
summer of 1967. AEI’s bitter opposition to GEC’s bid was in no small part a reflection 
of the shock and horror,
not to say anti-Semitism, at falling prey to this new breed of businessman. AEI was 
also bitterly opposed to
the Labour government’s meddling in industry.

Ironically, in the light of today’s accounting scandals, the GEC-AEI takeover was to 
lead to the most well
known accounting scandal in Britain up till then. While AEI had, half way through the 
financial year, forecast
profits of £10 million, GEC reported some ten months later that AEI had made losses of 
£4.5 million for the
financial year—a difference of some £14 million, a huge sum for those days. While some 
of the losses
reflected AEI’s changed circumstances, most were due to GEC’s judgement about the 
value of its inventories
and contracts.

The losses were part of GEC’s wider campaign firstly to discredit and get rid of the 
old management, and
secondly to close down many of AEI’s plants. In other words, the accounting chicanery 
was bound up with
bitter factional fights between fractions of capital—all in the cause of generating 
profits for the City. This was
the first time that the wider public became of aware of the malleability of profit 
figures.

It was this scandal, plus similar ones in relation to a number of takeovers by the 
criminal tycoon, Robert
Maxwell, that was to lead to the setting up of the Accounting Standards Committee and 
the London Stock
Exchange’s Takeover Panel. Their brief was to clean up Britain’s accounting regime and 
takeover rules at a
time when there were fears about the survival of capitalism, not just in Britain but 
all over the world.

Soon after swallowing up AEI, GEC took over English Electric, the last of the big 
three electrical engineering
companies. Weinstock now employed 228,000 workers in some of the most 
capital-intensive industries that
suffered from huge over capacity.

AEI job destruction

Within a few months of the AEI takeover, the axe fell. Only 29 of the 171 major plants 
were left unscathed.
The hardest hit was the Woolwich plant and a number of other London plants that were 
slated for closure.
Production was to be concentrated in Scotland and the north of England, where costs 
were lower. It set the
scene for huge industrial struggles. But despite the strikes and demonstrations, the 
trade union leaders made
no serious attempt to halt the closures. Their tactics were designed to diffuse the 
workers’ anger and get
some compensation. Woolwich became a byword for the brutality of big business in 
general and Weinstock in
particular. In 1970, he was knighted for his services to British capitalism and the 
Labour government and
given a peerage by Thatcher in 1980.

By 1974, he had cut the workforce to 170,000, a 25 percent reduction, and became known 
as Britain’s
largest “unemployer”, as he reorganised the British electrical engineering industry. 
This formed the backdrop
to the industrial struggles that intensified during the early 1970s under Edward 
Heath’s Conservative
government, culminating in the miners’ strike in 1973-4 that brought a minority Labour 
government to power
in February 1974.

When Wilson tried to win a working majority in a second election later that year—with 
a corporatist manifesto
for the rescue, nationalisation and rationalisation of some of Britain’s ailing 
industries and the formal
involvement of trade union representatives on company boards— Weinstock openly opposed 
him. He warned
that GEC would not comply with measures it considered illegitimate, called for a 
national coalition government,
and even hinted that he might go into politics himself.

GEC then made some of its rare political donations. It gave £25,000 to the Liberal 
Party, which had gained six
million votes in the February election and threatened to break the stranglehold of 
Britain’s two party system,
and, hedging its bets, £25,000 to the Tories.

Weinstock continued his policy of buying up companies, stripping out surplus capacity, 
cutting costs and
laying off workers throughout the 1970s and up until the mid-1980s, by which time GEC 
spanned the entire
engineering industry. Between 1970 and 1977, GEC’s profits grew fivefold. But his 
international ventures
were not a success, leaving GEC largely dependent upon the domestic market, government 
procurement,
and markets and governments in the former British Empire. At no point during the 1970s 
were sales to Europe
ever more than 15 percent of GEC’s total.

In 1976, the Labour government’s nationalisation with compensation of GEC’s aerospace 
interests and their
merger with other smaller companies in an effort to form a coherent and viable 
aircraft industry, brought it
into conflict with Weinstock who complained bitterly at what he called its 
“expropriation”. The ensuing row
rumbled on for years, but Labour’s generous terms may be gauged by the fact that 
Weinstock got short
shrift from the Thatcher government and later the European Court of Human Rights. The 
compensation
served to swell GEC’s growing cash mountain and led commentators to claim that GEC was 
more of a bank
than a manufacturing company.

Far from being an innovatory manager who expanded the productive forces, Weinstock cut 
all research and
development that was not underpinned by government subsidies, and developed a 
reputation for failures in
early warning systems, and torpedoes, to name but a few.

He exemplified the parasitic breed of British capitalists who rested upon two pillars: 
Firstly the cosy regime of
the government’s cost-plus pricing contracts for the armed forces, electricity 
generating industry,
telecommunications and related areas, and secondly a trade union leadership that could 
be relied upon to
keep their members under control while he cut labour costs. Cushioned in this way, GEC 
shunned or missed
numerous opportunities to move into newer expanding products and markets.

But by the 1980s, the very expansion of the productive forces in the post war boom 
that had led to the re-
emergence of falling profit rates generated a policy shift.

Weinstock was initially a keen supporter of the 1979 Conservative government under 
Thatcher, particularly
her anti-union agenda and hands-off approach to industry. She in turn helped him win 
key contracts
overseas, particularly in the Middle East. But Thatcher’s economic policies soon 
brought her into conflict with
Weinstock, particularly over the high interest rates and the value of the pound that 
closed markets to British
manufacturing goods and led to the closure of more than one third of British 
manufacturing in the early
1980s.

Furthermore, her espousal of neo-liberal economic policies, including privatisation 
and liberalisation that were
aimed at providing new sources of capital accumulation to combat the falling rate of 
profit, put an end to
GEC’s status as preferred, albeit not explicit, contractor to government departments 
and state owned
enterprises. She brought private sector personnel into key positions in the civil 
service to put an end to cost
plus pricing in defence procurement.

In the face of these developments, despite repeated rounds of cost cuttings and 
closures, GEC’s rate of
return stagnated and it became increasingly unpopular in the City, which was by the 
mid-1980s gripped by a
new takeover frenzy. Since its cash mountain made GEC an attractive target for a 
takeover bid by an
international corporation, Weinstock formed a series of defensive joint ventures with 
Alsthom in France,
Siemens in Germany and General Electric in the US to make a takeover all but 
impossible. This did little to
arrest GEC’s decline. The end of the Cold War following the collapse of the Soviet 
Union in 1990 and the
economic recession in the early 1990s further eroded GEC’s defence interests.

Weinstock clung onto power until 1996 when his successor, George Simpson, decided to 
sell off GEC’s
defence electronics and power generation divisions, its core businesses, and focus on 
telecoms, which were
at that time the stock market’s darling. Renaming the company Marconi, he went on a 
shopping spree, buying
up expensive telecoms companies in the US and plunging the company into debt. Despite 
his disastrous
record, Simpson walked away with a £1 million golden handshake.

On the day that Weinstock died, the rump of his company, once worth £35 billion, was 
burdened with £2.1
billion debts and, valued at a mere £100 million, and was staring corporate oblivion 
in the face.

Weinstock was successful in that more than many others, he recognised and grasped the 
lifeline provided by
the post-war arrangements: the Keynesian regulated economy, the welfare state and the 
state-owned
enterprises that operated behind protected national barriers. He used this framework 
to build a sheltered
domestic monopoly that ruthlessly shed surplus capital and labour. But as the demands 
of globalised capitalist
production swept away the nationally regulated economy, Weinstock’s strategy became 
untenable. It was his
good fortune to retire before that process had fully worked through and thus to 
retain, to some extent at
least, his aura of “success”.

Bibliography:
Alex Brummer and Roger Cowe, “Weinstock: The life and times of Britain’s Premier 
Industrialist”,
HarperCollinsBusiness, London, 1998.







Copyright 1998-2002
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without 
charge or profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for 
non-profit research and
educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth 
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to