-Caveat Lector-


<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-



-------- Original Message --------
From: "flackotar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [tar] Bush's Secret 7 nation Nuclear Hit List draws world outrage..
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.rense.com/general29/hit.htm

Bush's Secret 7 Nation Nuclear
Hit List Draws World Outrage
By Alexandra Williams and Bob Roberts 
The Daily Mirror - UK 
9-16-2

President Bush faced world anger last night over America's seven-
nation nuclear hit list. 
  
British MPs joined the outcry after a leaked Pentagon report revealed 
contingency plans to use nuclear weapons against China, Russia, Iran, 
Iraq, North Korea, Syria and Libya. The secret policy was denounced 
as warmongering "lunacy". 
  
Alarmed officials from Moscow to Tehran warned that the "power crazy" 
President, buoyed up by the successful campaign in Afghanistan, could 
plunge the world into chaos. British politicians said the strategy 
threatened the stability of the NATO alliance. 
  
International tension mounted as Washington pressed Britain to back 
an attack on Iraq - including the possible commitment of 25,000 
British troops to topple Saddam Hussein. 
  
Cabinet Minister Clare Short hinted that she might resign if Tony 
Blair supported a mass strike against Baghdad. She said: "We need to 
deal with the problem of Saddam Hussein - we don't need to inflict 
further suffering on the people of Iraq." 
  
Labour MPs Alice Mahon and Tam Dalyell will today deliver a letter to 
10 Downing Street warning the Prime Minister against joining any 
military action. 
  
US Vice President Dick Cheney arrived in London last night for talks 
with Mr Blair which will cover the threat posed by Iraq. 
  
No 10 insisted last night: "No decisions have been taken." 
  
Amid mounting anger, the target nations accused America of 
intimidation and "wreaking havoc on the whole world" and branded the 
plans a "lunatic" threat to world peace. 
  
In Britain, MPs said the sensational disclosures threatened the 
stability of the Western alliance. 
  
Labour MP Alice Mahon said: "The lunatics have taken over the White 
House. This report must be ringing alarms throughout NATO". The 
Pentagon document, known as the Nuclear Posture Review, was leaked as 
the US lobbied Britain to join an invasion of Iraq. 
  
International Development Secretary and Cabinet Minister Clare Short 
hinted she might resign if a strike went ahead. 
  
The review says the US must be ready to use nuclear weapons against 
China, Russia, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Syria and Libya. It then 
identified four areas where the US should be prepared to press the 
button: 
  
In an Arab-Israeli conflict, in a war between China and Taiwan, in an 
attack by North Korea on South Korea and in an attack by Iraq on 
Israel or another neighbor. Additionally, the weapons could be used 
against targets able to withstand conventional attack and in 
retaliation for the use of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. 
  
They could also be used in the event of "surprising military 
developments", reflecting fears that rogue states or terrorists could 
deploy weapons against the US. 
  
The review, leaked to the Los Angeles Times, orders the military to 
plan for the use of "smaller nuclear weapons" as a more effective 
deterrent against terrorist attacks. It also calls for cruise 
missiles to carry nuclear weapons. It is the first time the US has 
reviewed its nuclear strategy since 1994 and the first list of target 
nations to be made public. 
  
Last night it was seen as a warning to those states who might be 
harboring terrorists. In Russia, defense hawk General Leonid Ivashov 
said: "The heart of US political doctrine is to push powerful Russia 
off the political scene." 
  
Russian politician Dmitry Rogozin added: "This is a nuclear stick 
intended to intimidate us." Vyacheslav Nikonov, of the Politika think 
tank, branded the plans a "very negative signal" which would 
be "received in an appropriate fashion by Russia's leadership". 
  
Iran's former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, an aide to Supreme 
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said: "The US believes that by 
threatening countries they'll withdraw their demands. Their policy is 
one of intimidation." 
  
The Tehran Times newspaper said: "This indicates the US is going to 
wreak havoc on the world to establish its domination." Professor 
Michael Yahuda, professor of international relations at the London 
School of Economics, warned: "China won't be happy to be classified 
among rogue nations." 
  
Liberal Democrat spokesman Menzies Campbell said: "America seems to 
be moving from nuclear deterrence to nuclear war fighting. 
  
"It would drive a coach and horses through NATO's doctrine of nuclear 
strikes as a last resort." 
  
US Secretary of State Colin Powell insisted the report did not signal 
imminent action. 
  
He said: "We should not get carried away with some sense the US plans 
to use nuclear weapons in some contingency in the near future. 
  
"It's not the case. What the Pentagon has done with this is sound 
military, conceptual planning. 
  
"Not a single nation is being targeted by an American nuclear weapon 
on a day-to-day basis." 
  
National security adviser Condoleezza Rice added: "We all want to 
make the use of weapons of mass destruction less likely. 
  
"The way that you do that is to send a very strong signal to anyone 
who might use them against the United States that they'd be met with 
a devastating response." 
  
Vice-President Dick Cheney arrived in London last night to meet Tony 
Blair. He is expected to appeal for military support against Iraq. It 
is reported the US will ask for up to 25,000 British troops to form 
part of an invasion force. 
  
In the first sign of a Cabinet split, Ms Short denounced any invasion 
plans yesterday. She said: "An all-out military attack is, of course, 
not at all sensible. 
  
"We need to deal with the problem of Saddam Hussein. We don't need to 
inflict further suffering on the people of Iraq." 
  
Ms Short said the best answer was to allow UN inspectors back into 
Iraq, a move firmly ruled out by Iraq's Vice-President Taha Yassin 
Ramadan yesterday. Her warning amounted to a threat to resign if 
there is a strike against Iraq. Donald Anderson, Labour chairman of 
the Commons foreign affairs select committee, said military action on 
Iraq must only be a last resort. 
  
He said: "I think there are reckless elements in the Pentagon who are 
on a roll because of Afghanistan. 
  
"I would hope part of the task of our Government is to influence 
those who take a contrary view." 
  
Downing Street played down the reports of an American request for 
British troops. A spokesman said: "No decisions have been taken, let 
alone any requests made." 
  
  
Published in the Daily Mirror © 2002 mirror.co.uk 
  
http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/cra0225.htm
 





To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org 
OM 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- End Message ---

Reply via email to