-Caveat Lector-

THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING



Baghdad trade deals seen hindrance to US



By Anthony Shadid, Globe Staff, 9/19/2002

WASHINGTON - Iraq has dramatically broadened its business ties with Russia and Arab
countries over the past year, generating economic interests that could discourage
Baghdad's new trade partners from supporting a US attack, officials and analysts say.

Iraq has signed free-trade agreements with 10 Arab states, including key Persian Gulf
countries such as Qatar. It has deepened its ties with Syria and channeled substantial
business to US allies such as Egypt and Jordan. With Russia, its biggest trading 
partner, it is
negotiating a sweeping agreement that envisions cooperation in oil, agriculture, and
transportation that Iraqi officials say is worth $40 billion.

Moscow's interests there are so broad that a Russian diplomat met with Iraqi opposition
officials earlier this month in Washington to gauge whether it would respect 
commitments if
President Saddam Hussein were toppled, a US official said.

The Iraqis ''have used the economic lever quite skillfully to build a vested economic 
interest
in the continuation of the Iraqi regime,'' said James Placke, a former US diplomat and
director of Middle East research at Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

The potential economic repercussions of military action could complicate the
administration's efforts to get Iraq's new trading partners on board, and could 
influence this
week's discussions at the UN Security Council over a resolution against Iraq.

While many of the agreements mean little until after UN sanctions are lifted, they add 
to the
anxiety about a possible US invasion and its aftermath - concerns most deeply felt in 
Iraq's
own neighborhood. Opposition to US action in Iraq, ranging from hostility to pleas for 
a
diplomatic solution, stand in contrast to the support the United States received in 
the 1991
Gulf War, when Egypt, Syria, and other Arab states sent troops to join the fight.

Much of the opposition is motivated by politics - sympathy for the plight of Iraqis 
whose
livelihood has deteriorated since sanctions were imposed after Iraq's 1990 invasion of
Kuwait. But money matters, too. Since the Gulf War, many of Iraq's neighbors and former
allies say the conflict and sanctions have cost them dearly - Turkey has put its 
losses at $35
billion, Russia $30 billion.

Even though analysts say Iraq is an economic mess, with high unemployment and inflation
at 60 percent, it is still home to the world's second-largest oil reserves - 112 
billion barrels
of reserves and at least twice that many in potential fields. If chaos and instability 
ensued
after a US attack, those reserves would stay undeveloped, depriving countries like 
Russia of
a windfall from deals they have already signed, analysts say.

''The opposition comes from the fact that nobody understands what kind of Iraq will be 
left
behind and what kind of destabilizing impact it will have on the rest of the region,'' 
said
Vahan Zanoyan, president and chief executive of the Petroleum Finance Co., a consulting
firm in Washington. ''Are we going to leave something viable behind, or are we going to
leave a mess behind?''

The country with arguably the most to lose is Russia, a Security Council member that US
officials acknowledge will be a pivotal player in gaining UN support - or, at least
acquiescence - for an attack on Iraq. In addition to the $40 billion cooperation 
agreement,
Russian firms buy the lion's share of Iraq's oil exports and remain Baghdad's biggest 
trading
partner. Iraq still owes Russia at least $7 billion in Soviet-era debts, perhaps as 
much as
$11 billion.

Russian oil firms - along with companies from France and China, Security Council 
members
- have wrapped up multibillion dollar deals, though most of the work awaits the 
lifting of
sanctions.

Some administration officials expressed cynicism over the agreements, which position 
the
trade partners to hedge their bets on the outcome of the US-Iraq conflict. ''None of 
these
deals have any impact right now,'' one official said. ''It's all designed so they can 
throw
their hat in the ring in a post-Saddam environment.''

Other officials acknowledge that Russia's economic interests will have a bearing on the
course President Vladimir V. Putin takes. Some in Congress already have suggested that
the United States guarantee a portion of the deals and the repayment of Iraq's debts to
Russia to mollify its opposition to a US attack. A senior administration official said 
last week
it was still ''premature to talk about that kind of thing.''

Iraq has been relentless in making overtures to the Arab world. Foreign Minister Naji 
Sabri
has taken the lead.

In the past two years, it has wrapped up free-trade deals and other agreements with
countries from Algeria to the United Arab Emirates. It has toned down the anti-Arab
rhetoric that was a fixture after the Gulf War, and even relations with Kuwait and 
Saudi
Arabia have thawed. The moves helped produce a rapprochement that culminated in the
Arab summit in Beirut in March, when delegates urged an end to sanctions and rejected
any attack on Iraq.

''It has been the policy of the government to use whatever kind of economic leverage 
it has
to strengthen its position in the Arab world, and so far it has been successful,'' 
said Abbas
Alnasrawi, a specialist on Iraq at the University of Vermont.

Placke, the energy analyst, calls it an attempt ''to present itself as a normal state 
with
whom you can do normal business.''

That normal business has had its most profound impact on Syria and Jordan.

Jordan, the most vulnerable neighbor, is dependent on Iraqi oil that is delivered for 
free or
reduced rates. For years, it has protested to US officials about the impact of 
sanctions and,
more recently, the effects of a possible war on its precarious economy, US officials 
say.
The State Department, with mixed results, has sought alternatives to Iraqi oil for 
Jordan
and other markets for its agricultural products, particularly in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, 
and the
United Arab Emirates.

''There's been some progress. I'd be hard pressed to point to a firm agreement,'' a US
official said.

That lack of an agreement has produced anxiety among Jordan's businessmen, who have
strong ties with King Abdullah II.

Syria has a substantial stake, too, analysts say.

After siding with Iran during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war and the United States in the 
Gulf
War, it has largely reconciled with Iraq. Better ties have been helped by an estimated
150,000 barrels of oil a day that Iraq smuggles through Syria, mirroring networks Iraq 
has
fostered elsewhere through Turkey, Jordan, Iran, and Arab Gulf states.

The two also have wrapped up agreements on health, trade, the environment, and
education, and Syria has become a new entrepot for goods into Iraq. There has been talk
lately of reviving plans to build a railroad from Baghdad to Aleppo, in northwestern 
Syria.

How much economics will deter US military action remains a point of debate. But 
analysts
say the trade contributes to the substantial opposition to a US attack.

Paul Sullivan, a Middle East specialist at the National Defense University in 
Washington, said
that beyond the popular opposition to a US invasion, the web of economic ties that 
Iraq has
built in the region ''is bringing many of these countries closer to Iraq.''

Anthony Shadid can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This story ran on page A1 of the Boston Globe on 9/19/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to