-Caveat Lector-

P. Mitchell Prothero
Administration won't release 9-11 data
Thu Sep 19 13:50:05 2002
208.152.73.203

Administration won't release 9-11 data

By P. Mitchell Prothero
>From the Washington Politics & Policy Desk
Published 9/18/2002 5:24 PM

WASHINGTON, Sept. 18 (UPI) -- The administration has denied lawmakers
investigating the Sept. 11 attacks permission to reveal whether the
president or other White House staff received warning of potential
terrorist attacks against the United States, including plans by
al Qaida linked terrorists to use hijacked planes as weapons.

The joint House-Senate Intelligence Committee -- which is charged with
determining why intelligence and law enforcement agencies missed
apparently numerous warnings prior to Sept. 11 -- Wednesday released
summaries of dozens of now-declassified intelligence briefings dating
back to the early 1990's, but was denied permission to release the names
of the recipients by CIA boss George Tenet.

"The Director of Central Intelligence has declined to declassify two
issues of particular importance to this inquiry," Eleanor Hill, staff
director for the committee told the panel, "any references to the
intelligence community providing information to the president or White
House and the identity of and information on a key al Qaida leader
involved in the September 11 attacks."

But the panel's co-chairman, Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., said that the
point of the panel's inquiry was to fulfill an oversight responsibility
and not to point blame at anyone in the government, White House or
intelligence services.

"These public hearings are part of our search for the truth -- not to
point fingers or pin blame, but with the goal of identifying and
correcting whatever systematic problems might have prevented our
government from detecting and disrupting al Qaida's plot," he said.

Co-chairman Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla. -- without directly addressing
the administration's gag order -- said that there were only three reasons
to keep information a secret: to protect sources or methods of collection,
to protect the plans and intentions of operations, and to avoid interfering
with ongoing investigations and prosecutions.

Hill detailed the reasons given for the decision to classify some
information about who knew what, in a probe designed to determine exactly
that.

"According to (Tenet), the president's knowledge of intelligence
information relevant to this inquiry remains classified even when the
substance of intelligence information has been declassified,"
Hill told lawmakers.

"With respect to the key al Qaida leader involved in the September 11
attacks, the DCI declined to declassify his identity despite an enormous
volume of media reporting on this individual."

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, a Kuwaiti national, has given an interview in
which he claims to have been the organizer and financier for the attacks.
In an interview with an Arab language news service, he admitted to being
a top al Qaida official and appears to be the person in question.
He remains at large and is thought to be in Pakistan.

Hill complained that the decision to bar the release of the two sets of
information has restricted the probe, but she noted that the committee
lacks authority to overrule Tenet, whose formal title is Director of
Central Intelliegence on such matters.

"The Joint Inquiry Staff disagrees with the DCI's position on both issues,"
she said. "We believe the American public has a compelling interest in this
information and that public disclosure would not harm national security.
However, we do not have an independent authority to declassify intelligence
information short of a lengthy procedure in the U.S. Congress."

The dispute over declassification could lead to a showdown between congress
and the White House. Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mi., threatened in a statement at
Wednesday's hearing to try to force the administration to declassify
disputed
material.

"I hope the leadership will let the Administration know our committee will
seek congressional authorization to declassify appropriate information if
the executive branch refuses," said Levin in his statement.

The ranking Senate Republican, Richard Shelby of Alabama, said that
Wednesday's decision -- and other regulations that have prevented members
of the committee from following the work of the joint staff -- threatens
the success of the entire committee.

"Many members have found it exceedingly difficult to get information about
the inquiry," he said.

"They are frustrated by what they perceive to be efforts to limit their
ability to participate fully."


Copyright © 2002 United Press International
k

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to