-Caveat Lector-

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Rival Reformers Head Into Runoff for Serbian Presidency

September 30, 2002
By DANIEL SIMPSON






BELGRADE, Serbia, Sept. 29 - President Vojislav Kostunica
of Yugoslavia, a moderate nationalist, came out ahead today
in the first round of the election for the Serbian
presidency, preliminary results indicated.

Mr. Kostunica won 31.3 percent of the vote, with Miroljub
Labus, a pro-Western economist, coming in second, with 27.8
percent, according to projections from the Center for Free
Elections and Democracy, in Belgrade, which monitored the
balloting.

The two rival reformers from the coalition that ousted
Slobodan Milosevic two years ago will face each other in a
runoff, with Mr. Kostunica the clear favorite to win.

But Vojislav Seselj, a nationalist firebrand, made a
surprisingly strong showing, after an endorsement by Mr.
Milosevic from his jail cell in The Hague, where he is
facing genocide charges before a United Nations war crimes
tribunal.

Mr. Seselj won 22.5 percent, according to the preliminary
results, apparently picking up support from the people most
disillusioned with the government's free market reforms,
which have yet to make them better off. Mr. Labus, the
architect of Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic's economic
reform program, will be hard pressed to win them over to
his side before the Oct. 13 runoff.

"Kostunica succeeded in turning this election into a
referendum about Djindjic," said Ognjen Pribicevic, a
political analyst in Belgrade. "People expected change
overnight, but today many are worse off than they were
under Milosevic and they are unhappy about corruption and
organized crime."

Mr. Kostunica, who has been president of Yugoslavia since
Mr. Milosevic's ouster, is seeking a new job because the
federation comprising Serbia and Montenegro will be
dissolved later this year.

If he wins the runoff, a certainty according to most polls,
the conflict between him and Mr. Djindjic, his chief rival,
is expected to intensify.

The departing Serbian president, Milan Milutinovic, has
been almost invisible for the past two years because he is
to face a war crimes trial alongside Mr. Milosevic when he
leaves office. But Mr. Kostunica is expected to use the
position to force a general election by persuading some of
the 17 parties in the governing coalition to desert Mr.
Djindjic.

The bitter power struggle between the two camps dominates
political life to such an extent that voters could be
forgiven for thinking that was the only issue. But it
conceals a basic dispute about the pace and nature of
reforms needed to make Serbia fit for eventual membership
of the European Union.

Mr. Labus and Mr. Djindjic want to push ahead with economic
reforms to win Western friends and attract foreign
investment. Mr. Kostunica puts greater emphasis on the need
for constitutional reforms to establish the rule of law and
says the poor should be shielded from radical economic
changes for now.

But many people in Serbia, where monthly salaries average
just $150, have little faith in either side's promises, and
a low turnout could thwart Mr. Kostunica's anticipated
second-round victory.

Just 55 percent of the electorate voted today. If this
figure dips below 50 percent for the runoff, the election
will be annulled, and a new one could be put off for
months.

That would help Mr. Djindjic, who is personally unpopular
with voters and eager to postpone a general election for as
long as possible.

But his battle with Mr. Kostunica has already brought
normal government business to a virtual standstill, and
continued political uncertainty is only likely to increase
voter apathy and delay economic recovery.

"Political stability is the sine qua non for economic
reform and investment from abroad," said Srbobran
Brankovic, director of the Medium Index Gallup
International polling institute. "A failed election would
plunge Serbia into deep political crisis."

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/30/international/europe/30SERB.html?ex=1034385216&ei=1&en=f24ece399b4eff85



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to