-Caveat Lector- -----Original Message----- From: Murray Kahl [mailto:kahl1@;gate.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:15 PM To: Recipient list suppressed Subject: Israel Prepared for Pre-emption with Neutron Weapons
Israel Prepared for Pre-emption with Neutron Weapons Almost went to nuclear war in late February By Professor M. Kahl In his October 8, 2002, speech to the nation illuminating the urgent imperative for taking on Saddam Hussein, President Bush for the first time raised the possibility of a preemptive strike by Iraq while the U.S. was still gearing up for the forthcoming confrontation. "An Iraqi regime faced with its own demise may attempt cruel and desperate measures," the President stated. Indeed, Iraq is accelerating its war preparations in anticipation for what Baghdad is convinced to be an inevitable US onslaught. The possibility of an Iraqi preemptive strike against Israel in order to forestall a U.S. strike is not an abstract notion, because - as revealed in Yossef Bodansky's new and deeply insightful book The High Cost of Peace - Iraq has already demonstrated its penchant for such dangerous provocations. Indeed, from its very first days in office, the Bush Administration has been tested by Saddam Hussein with risky brinkmanship. Significantly, these Iraqi upsurges were not only in the context of the long standing Saddam-Arafat treaty according to which Iraq will launch a major war against Israel in order to save the Palestinians - with Saddam assuming in the process the long-coveted position of Leader of the Arab World - but as an Iraqi demonstration of defiance and hostility to the new Administration. In mid February 2001, Baghdad put the Bush Administration to its first major test - bringing the Middle East to the verge of a major and potentially nuclear war, while setting the stage for the still escalating U.S. crisis with Iraq. Bodansky explained: On February 16, in retaliation for Iraq's growing audacity and effectiveness in challenging the enforcement of the no-fly zone, U.S. and U.K. aircraft bombed six Iraqi radar posts, command posts, and fiber-optics communications sites relatively close to Baghdad. The next day, Saddam ordered his armed forces to assume wartime readiness. The first units to react were the six divisions in western Iraq, which now moved farther westward toward the Jordanian and Syrian borders. At the same time, intense activities that could be interpreted as preparations for launching ballistic missiles were detected in bases throughout western and southern Iraq. U.S. and Israeli intelligence agreed that the Iraqis were preparing for ballistic- missile strikes against Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait, with the inclination to use any retaliation as the excuse for launching an all-out war against Israel. With Riyadh reluctant to permit the American use of Saudi bases in connection with hostilities involving Israel, the IDF, with some help from U.S. forces in Turkey, would have to bear the brunt of the anticipated confrontation. Consequently, Israeli air-defense units, along with the U.S. Patriot units still in preparation, were deployed to emergency positions. The Aegis-class cruiser USS Porter sailed off the southern coast of Israel, covering the theater with its radar. By February 22, Iraqi SSM units were deployed and on the move throughout the western desert capable of launching their first missiles in less than twenty-four hours. Concurrently, HizbAllah forces in southern Lebanon went on alert following instructions from Damascus. The intense communications between Arafat, Saddam, and Bashar detected by Israeli and U.S. intelligence added to the growing apprehension. That evening, analysts in both Washington and Jerusalem concluded that all was ready for a regional war short of the final "Go" from Saddam Hussein. Intelligence services and governments in Western Europe must have shared this impression. Just as the high-level officials in Washington and Jerusalem were reaching agreement about the situation in Iraq and the appropriate response, the French government, and reportedly also the British, warned Saddam's inner circle through clandestine emergency channels of communication that they knew for a fact that Israel was about to use neutron weapons against the Iraqi expeditionary forces and the suspected missile sites if the movement toward war was not stopped. With Washington unaware of the European warnings, two U.S. strike formations took off one from the Incirlik base in Turkey, the other from a Sixth Fleet carrier and headed toward western Iraq. Large formations of the Israeli Air Force were also in the air off the Syrian coast ready to head toward Iraq should Iraqi missiles fall on Israel. The first American formations were engaged in the Mosul area by Iraqi air-defense units, which launched some thirty-five SAMs and heavy anti-aircraft barrages. The U.S. aircraft counterattacked with missiles and bombs causing negligible damage because of the quality of the Iraqi camouflage and concealment. By now, however, the Iraqi forces throughout the area were visibly standing down, in a way that was noticed by all possible intelligence collection systems. It seemed that Saddam had decided not to ignore the French warning and risk an Israeli nuclear strike. Subsequently, as described in The High Cost of Peace, Baghdad had not given up its commitment to war. On February 27, Saddam told a conference of Iraq's senior air-defense officers (now responsible for Iraq's ballistic missiles, in order to circumvent U.N. sanctions) and officials of the Atomic Energy Commission that Iraq was committed to escalating the confrontation throughout the Middle East. "We will deliver terrible strikes on the United States and cause the enemy to pay a heavy price, if it dares to continue attacking Iraq. Iraq will not permit the enemy to harm any other part of the Arab Nation," the Iraqi media quoted Saddam as saying. Concurrently, Iraq embarked on a still unfolding intense military build-up aimed to better prepare Iraq for the inevitable confrontation with the US and Israel. The forthcoming war with Iraq is therefore a timely culmination of a strategic dynamics virtually as old as the Bush Administration. <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om