-Caveat Lector-

http://www.insidedenver.com/drmn/columbine/article/0,1299,DRMN_106_1489184,00.html

Rocky Mountain News


To print this page, select File then Print from your browser

URL: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/columbine/article/0,1299,DRMN_106_
1489184,00.html

Columbine victim pursues lawsuit against drug firm

Mark Taylor claims drug Luvox partly at fault for rampage

By Jeff Kass, Rocky Mountain News
October 19, 2002

Mark Taylor is a 19-year-old Columbine High School shooting victim who travels the 
country
giving motivational speeches. Lisa Van Syckel, 41, calls herself a "proud, stay-at- 
home
mom" who lives in New Jersey.

Taylor has visited Van Syckel only once, yet the two are engaged in a common cause: to
unlock the remaining secrets of the nation's deadliest school shooting and take on a 
$12
billion segment of the prescription drug market.

Van Syckel is helping finance a civil lawsuit filed by Taylor against the manufacturer 
of the
drug Luvox, which is designed to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder. Put simply, 
Taylor
claims the drug contributed to Columbine shooter Eric Harris' deadly rampage April 20,
1999.

Van Syckel, who says her daughter, now 17, had a violent reaction to a drug similar to
Luvox, is part of a nationwide network that uses the Internet to share information and
campaign against drugs they consider dangerous. Van Syckel says she has contributed
$31,000 to help fund Taylor's lawsuit and pledges to do whatever it takes to get it to 
trial.

"I believe Mark Taylor is a victim. I believe Eric Harris is a victim, and the 
families have a
right to find out the truth at trial, and I believe this lawsuit will allow all of the 
secrets of
Columbine to come out," she said.

Taylor's lawsuit targets Georgia-based Solvay Pharmaceuticals, which manufactures 
Luvox.
Introduced in 1994, Luvox belongs to a class of drugs known as selective serotonin 
reuptake
inhibitors, or SSRIs. Such drugs increase serotonin, a naturally occurring brain 
chemical.
Low levels of serotonin are thought to contribute to various disorders. While Luvox is
indicated for obsessive-compulsive disorder,

SSRIs such as Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft target depression.

The vast majority of the medical establishment stands behind the drugs.

"The message I would want to give you is how extremely beneficial (the drugs) have
been," said Denver psychiatrist Tony Robucci, chairman of the public information and
education committee of the Colorado Psychiatric Society. "I have cards saying thank 
you for
giving me back my life."

But critics cite the drugs in connection with various, high-profile crimes: Oregon 
school
shooter Kip Kinkel was at one point on Prozac, Connecticut lottery shooter Matthew Beck
took Luvox and 60-year-old Donald Schell used Paxil. The Wyoming man killed his wife,
daughter, granddaughter and himself.

While critics blame the drug for such violence, others blame the underlying disorders 
they
are meant to address.

"It's neither. It's both," said Houston-based Andy Vickery, an attorney who has led 
the fight
against such psychiatric drugs.

Vickery said only 3 percent to 5 percent of those who take psychiatric drugs such as 
Luvox
have adverse side effects. In turn, an even smaller percentage turn violent.

But in his view, the drugs are "the trigger" for the outbursts.

Last month, the Food and Drug Administration entered the courtroom battle in a case
involving Zoloft. Flora Motus sued drug manufacturer Pfizer because her husband, who
suffered from depression, committed suicide after being on Zoloft for about a week.

But government attorneys filed a friend of the court brief saying it would violate 
federal law
for the Zoloft warning label to say the drug causes suicide. The attorneys argued that
research does not prove that claim and that false statements could deter people from 
using
a helpful drug.

Taylor's lawsuit continues the national debate.

Taylor, 16 on the day of the Columbine shooting, was near the school parking lot when 
he
was overrun by Harris and fellow gunman Dylan Klebold.

"Mark Allen Taylor was shot by Eric Harris first by shotgun and then by rifle in 
excess of
seven rounds in his leg, arm, chest and abdomen," according to the lawsuit.

Harris killed himself alongside Klebold after fatally shooting 13 and wounding more 
than 20.

In early 1998, according to filings in Taylor's suit, Harris was on the SSRI 
antidepressant
Zoloft for two months, but became "a bit obsessional." Harris was switched to Luvox. 
The
drug was in his system at the time of the shooting, according to his autopsy.

Taylor's October 2001 lawsuit says Luvox caused Harris to become manic, psychotic,
suicidal and brought about "emotional blunting," or a lack of inhibition. The lawsuit 
adds
that Solvay failed to warn of "risks and dangers" associated with the drug.

The Luvox warning label does note that studies involving primarily depressed patients 
show
mania occurred in about 1 percent of those on the drug. The label also notes that those
with depression are inherently at risk for suicide.

Solvay says in court filings it provided "reasonable warnings." The company adds that 
the
drug is safe, effective and approved by the FDA.

"Luvox was designed, manufactured and distributed in accordance with all applicable
standards, customs, and the state of the art prevailing at the time," the company said 
in
court papers.

Four other Columbine victims' families had joined Taylor in the lawsuit but have since
dropped out. Those contacted said it was for financial reasons. Taylor persisted.

Taylor has been crisscrossing the country lecturing to Christian-based groups and 
others on
self- improvement and his lawsuit. He said an appearance might bring him $500 or so in
donations and proceeds from tape sales of talks given by himself and Ann Tracy, a Salt
Lake City biopsychologist and critic of the type of psychiatric drug taken by Harris.

"I don't get paid much, but we touch a lot of people," he said.

Van Syckel and Taylor connected through Tracy. "This is the case I really wanted to 
see go
to court," she said. Her Web site, www.drugawareness.org, solicits donations for 
Taylor's
suit. It asks that money be sent to Taylor's Lincoln, Neb.-based attorney, John DeCamp.

Van Syckel's donations, $20,000 worth, are touted on the site. That includes $10,000 
for
Taylor's attorney and $10,000 for an expert opinion on SSRI drugs. Van Syckel said she
recently sent an additional $11,000 for another expert report.

Boulder product liability attorney Bob Schuetze said suits like Taylor's face serious
obstacles.

"Most people would recognize that they are very difficult cases because you have to 
prove,
No. 1, the product was defective, and the product was a cause of the injury," he said.

Copyright 2002, Rocky Mountain News. All Rights Reserved.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to