-Caveat Lector-

"Officials of several major firms said they were taking care to avoiding
playing any role in the debate in Washington over how to proceed on Iraq.
"There's no real upside for American oil companies to take a very aggressive
stance at this stage. There'll be plenty of time in the future," said James
Lucier, an oil analyst with Prudential Securities.  "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wpdyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A1884
1-2002Sep14&notFound=true

In Iraqi War Scenario, Oil Is Key Issue
U.S. Drillers Eye Huge Petroleum Pool

By Dan Morgan and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, September 15, 2002; Page A01

A U.S.-led ouster of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein could open a bonanza for
American oil companies long banished from Iraq, scuttling oil deals between
Baghdad and Russia, France and other countries, and reshuffling world
petroleum markets, according to industry officials and leaders of the Iraqi
opposition.

Although senior Bush administration officials say they have not begun to
focus on the issues involving oil and Iraq, American and foreign oil
companies have already begun maneuvering for a stake in the country's huge
proven reserves of 112 billion barrels of crude oil, the largest in the world
outside Saudi Arabia.

The importance of Iraq's oil has made it potentially one of the
administration's biggest bargaining chips in negotiations to win backing from
the U.N. Security Council and Western allies for President Bush's call for
tough international action against Hussein. All five permanent members of the
Security Council -- the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China --
have international oil companies with major stakes in a change of leadership
in Baghdad.

"It's pretty straightforward," said former CIA director R. James Woolsey, who
has been one of the leading advocates of forcing Hussein from power. "France
and Russia have oil companies and interests in Iraq. They should be told that
if they are of assistance in moving Iraq toward decent government, we'll do
the best we can to ensure that the new government and American companies work
closely with them."

But he added: "If they throw in their lot with Saddam, it will be difficult
to the point of impossible to persuade the new Iraqi government to work with
them."

Indeed, the mere prospect of a new Iraqi government has fanned concerns by
non-American oil companies that they will be excluded by the United States,
which almost certainly would be the dominant foreign power in Iraq in the
aftermath of Hussein's fall. Representatives of many foreign oil concerns
have been meeting with leaders of the Iraqi opposition to make their case for
a future stake and to sound them out about their intentions.

Since the Persian Gulf War in 1991, companies from more than a dozen nations,
including France, Russia, China, India, Italy, Vietnam and Algeria, have
either reached or sought to reach agreements in principle to develop Iraqi
oil fields, refurbish existing facilities or explore undeveloped tracts. Most
of the deals are on hold until the lifting of U.N. sanctions.

But Iraqi opposition officials made clear in interviews last week that they
will not be bound by any of the deals.

"We will review all these agreements, definitely," said Faisal Qaragholi, a
petroleum engineer who directs the London office of the Iraqi National
Congress (INC), an umbrella organization of opposition groups that is backed
by the United States. "Our oil policies should be decided by a government in
Iraq elected by the people."

Ahmed Chalabi, the INC leader, went even further, saying he favored the
creation of a U.S.-led consortium to develop Iraq's oil fields, which have
deteriorated under more than a decade of sanctions. "American companies will
have a big shot at Iraqi oil," Chalabi said.

The INC, however, said it has not taken a formal position on the structure of
Iraq's oil industry in event of a change of leadership.

While the Bush administration's campaign against Hussein is presenting vast
possibilities for multinational oil giants, it poses major risks and
uncertainties for the global oil market, according to industry analysts.

Access to Iraqi oil and profits will depend on the nature and intentions of a
new government. Whether Iraq remains a member of the Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries, for example, or seeks an independent role,
free of the OPEC cartel's quotas, will have an impact on oil prices and the
flow of investments to competitors such as Russia, Venezuela and Angola.

While Russian oil companies such as Lukoil have a major financial interest in
developing Iraqi fields, the low prices that could result from a flood of
Iraqi oil into world markets could set back Russian government efforts to
attract foreign investment in its untapped domestic fields. That is because
low world oil prices could make costly ventures to unlock Siberia's oil
treasures far less appealing.

Bush and Vice President Cheney have worked in the oil business and have long-
standing ties to the industry. But despite the buzz about the future of Iraqi
oil among oil companies, the administration, preoccupied with military
planning and making the case about Hussein's potential threat, has yet to
take up the issue in a substantive way, according to U.S. officials.

The Future of Iraq Group, a task force set up at the State Department, does
not have oil on its list of issues, a department spokesman said last week. An
official with the National Security Council declined to say whether oil had
been discussed during consultations on Iraq that Bush has had over the past
several weeks with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Western leaders.

On Friday, a State Department delegation concluded a three-day visit to
Moscow in connection with Iraq. In early October, U.S. and Russian officials
are to hold an energy summit in Houston, at which more than 100 Russian and
American energy companies are expected.

Rep. Curt Weldon (R-Pa.) said Bush is keenly aware of Russia's economic
interests in Iraq, stemming from a $7 billion to $8 billion debt that Iraq
ran up with Moscow before the Gulf War. Weldon, who has cultivated close ties
to Putin and Russian parliamentarians, said he believed the Russian leader
will support U.S. action in Iraq if he can get private assurances from Bush
that Russia "will be made whole" financially.

Officials of the Iraqi National Congress said last week that the INC's
Washington director, Entifadh K. Qanbar, met with Russian Embassy officials
here last month and urged Moscow to begin a dialogue with opponents of
Hussein's government.

But even with such groundwork, the chances of a tidy transition in the oil
sector appear highly problematic. Rival ethnic groups in Iraq's north are
already squabbling over the the giant Kirkuk oil field, which Arabs, Kurds
and minority Turkmen tribesmen are eyeing in the event of Hussein's fall.

Although the volumes have dwindled in recent months, the United States was
importing nearly 1 million barrels of Iraqi oil a day at the start of the
year. Even so, American oil companies have been banished from direct
involvement in Iraq since the late 1980s, when relations soured between
Washington and Baghdad.

Hussein in the 1990s turned to non-American companies to repair fields
damaged in the Gulf War and Iraq's earlier war against Iran, and to tap
undeveloped reserves, but U.S. government studies say the results have been
disappointing.

While Russia's Lukoil negotiated a $4 billion deal in 1997 to develop the 15-
billion-barrel West Qurna field in southern Iraq, Lukoil had not commenced
work because of U.N. sanctions. Iraq has threatened to void the agreement
unless work began immediately.

Last October, the Russian oil services company Slavneft reportedly signed a
$52 million service contract to drill at the Tuba field, also in southern
Iraq. A proposed $40 billion Iraqi-Russian economic agreement also reportedly
includes opportunities for Russian companies to explore for oil in Iraq's
western desert.

The French company Total Fina Elf has negotiated for rights to develop the
huge Majnoon field, near the Iranian border, which may contain up to 30
billion barrels of oil. But in July 2001, Iraq announced it would no longer
give French firms priority in the award of such contracts because of its
decision to abide by the sanctions.

Officials of several major firms said they were taking care to avoiding
playing any role in the debate in Washington over how to proceed on Iraq.
"There's no real upside for American oil companies to take a very aggressive
stance at this stage. There'll be plenty of time in the future," said James
Lucier, an oil analyst with Prudential Securities.

But with the end of sanctions that likely would come with Hussein's ouster,
companies such as ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco would almost assuredly play a
role, industry officials said. "There's not an oil company out there that
wouldn't be interested in Iraq," one analyst said.

Staff writer Ken Bredemeier contributed to this report.

� 2002 The Washington Post Company

--------------------------------------
Steve Wingate, Webmaster
ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com
Latest Update: Cydonia in 3-D
http://www.anomalous-images.com/Odyssey/Cydonia_3-d.html

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to