[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Va Court INTEL Operations Part 2 of 4

[RoadsEnd]

-Caveat Lector-



<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---

-Caveat Lector- Thank you for your prompt reply.  I haven't seen the Yahoo briefcase exhibits and if you would be kind enough to email copies of xboth the bank accounts and the Defendants Motion to Dismiss, I would be grateful.   Regards   David ----- Original Message ----- From: Ambassador Leo E Wanta To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:37 PM Subject: Re: [CIA-DRUGS] Va Court INTEL Operations Part 2 of 4 Good morning..... Responses >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Overall control per the original agreement is/was KOK Howe Kwong and this writer 2. Bank/banque statements are listed in the Yahoo Briefcase exhibits, if not found pls adv and we will e-mail -- based on previous tallie it is beyond USDollars "trillions" - and should be distributed to U. S. Treasury at 18 percent upon re-collection per the KOK/WANTA/USG agreement 3. Combination of foreign currencies, bullion certificates, prime bank guarantees, promissory bank notes, U. S. Treasury obligations, and the like 4. Already POSTED in Yahoo Briefcase, part 2 >>>  Va Spy Court <<<<< 5. We believe all is clearly available with the original court filings, as well as Full Disclosure of all USGovn documentation and exhibits, within United States Court of Appeals - or the Seventh Circuit, Chicago, Il, USA 60604: Case No. 02-1544, Ambassador Leo E Wanta and New Republic/USA Financial roup, LTD Ges.m.b.H. {Austria} v Secretary Richard Chandler, Wisconsin Department of Revenue; James E Doyle, Attorney General State of Wisonsin; Grant C Johnson, United States Attorney Western District of Wisconsin;  John Douglas Haag, Former Assistant Attorney General State of Wisconsin; Jack C Voight, Wisconsin State Treasurer: Judith Coleman, Clerk of Dane County, State of Wisconsin; Attorney General John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of America; and, Paul H O'Neill, Secretary of the Treasury, United States of America 6. Corporate Treasurer Hope this helps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Golgbug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thank you.  I now have a clearer understanding.   A number of additional questions spring to mind.   Firstly, under whose overall control is the sum of $864 billion you referenc in your Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss?   Secondly, would you consent to posting to this List one or more bank statements that show balances of some or all of the value ($864 billion) referenced in your motion?  Also by how much has this total amount grown and what is the current balance available?   Thirdly, is this value composed of cash, paper assets, metals or a combination of all?   Fourthly, will you consent to posting a copy of the Defendant Motion to Dismiss, so that this list can see both sides of the legal argument?   Fifthly, are the Court records for the US District Court for the Third District of Virginia, Docket number 02-1363-A freely available or are they also sealed?  Who is the presiding Judge in this case?     Lastly, who is Charles Croninshield Jr., and what is his function in your business activities?   David     ----- Original Message ----- From: Ambassador Leo E Wanta To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: Re: [CIA-DRUGS] Va Court INTEL Operations Part 2 of 4 second attempt to reply.... After all beneficiaries were compensated per the Agreement percentiles == KOK and I invested our percentage in variou financial transactions, as well as the original Agreement packages like Prime Bank Guarantees, Promissory Bank Notes, U. S. Treasury Obligations, and the like; thereby, becoming "Principals." Our Tax Treaty funds were our favorable variances after re-investment of our "set-aside allocations" from the original Agreement disbursals, thus the 18 percent repatriation tax payments in good, clean, clear, freely-transferable and non-criminal origin funding/reserves. Therefore, these funds were created outside of the mutual operating USGovn, et al,  Agreements. The Tax Treaty is sealed in a different court venue originally, and identified by the Court, as well as their Exhibit listing, and S      W      . The Special Court, certain Members of Congress, USGovn Officials, et al have received a copy and/or reviewed a copy for their valued consideration and corrective action.                            Best regards,  Golgbug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thank you for yours.  I admit to being confused and hope you will consent to elicudate sufficiently for me to to understand what appears to be a conflict in meaning.  Your para 2 as outlined below clearly says that the "banking and foreign treasury transactions were NOT operated/conducted as covert and/or secret intelligence operative activity of the USG."   Moreover, you state in para 5 sub section C of your 27 Nov 02 Affidavit (Exhibit A) that:       The subject Agreement (the Tax Treaty) does not pertain to payment for services and/or assets             derived as a result of the conducting of either covert and/or secret operations performed on behalf of         the United States Government.  Plaintiff over the years may or may not have conducted such covert         and/or secret dealings on behalf of the United States Government but the financial references in the         subject Agreement were not generated from any such covert and/or secret operations (italics and         underlining are mine).   How do you reconcile these statements from the below one in which you say:       Yes - our USGovn was a first secured beneficiary and we performed for them certain     financial/transactional obligations for and on  behalf of the USGovn   Are you actually saying that the USG was "first secured beneficiary..." as a specific consequence of the 18% tax you agreed to pay under the negotiated and prevailing Tax Treaty?  In other words the involvement of the USG was only a result of the collection of tax but was not otherwise involved in any way?   Also, since the Tax Treaty is not governed by the National Security Act of 1947, or any other secrecy clauses (as stated by you in the same Affidavit) would you be agreeable to providing a copy of this document for perusal?   Regards   David   ----- Original Message ----- From: Ambassador Leo E Wanta To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:56 PM Subject: Re: [CIA-DRUGS] Va Court INTEL Operations Part 2 of 4 Good Morning After each and every financial transaction the facilitating banks/banques based on irrevocable, bank-endorsed payorders were distributed to ALL principal parties and/or "set-aside" by the bankers per the beneficiary instructions. Mr KOK and I combined our contracted financial funds and traded Prime Bank Guarantees, Promissory Bank Notes, FOREX opportunities, precious metals, and the like thru credit-worthy banks/banques  - as well as other opportunities - as a Principal Party. Yes - our USGovn was a first secured beneficiary and we performed for them certain financial/transactional obligations for and on  behalf of the USGovn - our financial accruals are above and beyond their clearly endorsed USGovn activities; and my partner's funds and mine [ we were equal beneficiaries] and  subject to these mutual transactional contracts, among oher things. Hope this helps..  A original source of favourable monetary resources is clearly identified in "Thieves World" by Claire Sterling, Simon & Schuster, NY, 1994 publication - in public libraries; whereas our USGovn Agreement included/allowed KOK Howe Kwong and I,  to collectively  receive good, clear, clean, freely-transferable and non-criminal origin International funds- as noted  in the agreed-upon percentiles - by our USGovn mutual principals/handlers yet, per our original USGovn operating offshore contracts.  Best regards,  Golgbug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lee:   In reference to your "Summary of Action" document, and If I understand correctly what you are saying, ALL of your banking and financial activity was for personal benefit and was not conducted on behalf of the United States Government.  This arises from your statement in para 2 (page 2) of this document when you state:       The banking and foreign treasury transactions were not operated/conducted as covert and/or secret     intelligence/operative activity of the United States Government.   In para 3 of the same document you add:       Plaintiff [i.e., you] relied on the financial success of the banking and other financial transactions     conducted in part through the mentioned corporations to receive personal economic rewards.   If this understanding is, indeed, correct then I believe this to be a very different picture from that which you have previously presented.  Indeed, it is now difficult not to conclude that you wished to create the impression (or illusion) that your banking and financial activities were de facto US Government operations, when you knew they were not.   Would you care to comment on this?   David Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. L'ambassadeur de Somalia `a Berne / Ottawa His Excellency, Leo Emil Wanta Diplomatic Passports No. 04362 and 12535 Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Mogadishu Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. L'ambassadeur de Somalia `a Berne / Ottawa His Excellency, Leo Emil Wanta Diplomatic Passports No. 04362 and 12535 Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Mogadishu Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. L'ambassadeur de Somalia `a Berne / Ottawa His Excellency, Leo Emil Wanta Diplomatic Passports No. 04362 and 12535 Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Mogadishu Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. <A HREF="">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om

--- End Message ---