Matthew D. Fuller wrote > > > > I have created a .ctwm-sounds file [...] > > Peripherally, I have to wonder if there's a good reason this is a > separate file in the first place, instead of just being in the > twmrc...
I had the same thought: why not define one or more new functions in .ctwmrc using the 'f.exec string' mechanism (the string is passed to /bin/sh for execution). I tried a menu option invoking 'aplay' with a .wav file using this mechanism and it worked fine. But I have no idea what rplay does, so this comparison may be irrelevant. Perhaps .ctwmrc doesn't provide syntax for the events required to produce sounds? Apologies if my ignorance makes this comment totally irrelevant. Aaron
