Le mardi, 10 mars 2015 à 13:10, Thomas Braibant a écrit : > Thanks. This is what I had in mind with void pointers. I will go > forward with that solution. (And refrain myself from trying to be > pedantic inside these particular bindings.)
I don't remember exactly but maybe you can be pedantic with views. Best, Daniel _______________________________________________ Ctypes mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/ctypes
